The Role of Source Characteristics and Message Appeals in Public Service Advertising (PSA) Messages: An Application of Fishbein’s Expectancy-Value Model and the Match-Up Hypothesis for Anti-Binge-Drinking Campaigns Targeting College Students

Ho-Young (Anthony) Ahn, H. Paek, Spencer F. Tinkham
{"title":"The Role of Source Characteristics and Message Appeals in Public Service Advertising (PSA) Messages: An Application of Fishbein’s Expectancy-Value Model and the Match-Up Hypothesis for Anti-Binge-Drinking Campaigns Targeting College Students","authors":"Ho-Young (Anthony) Ahn, H. Paek, Spencer F. Tinkham","doi":"10.1080/10641734.2018.1503112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Guided by a match-up hypothesis and Fishbein’s expectancy-value theory, this research examines the effects of message sources and appeals in anti-binge-drinking public service ads (PSAs) on college students' binge-drinking attitudes and behavioral intention. College students (N = 251) participated in a 2 sources (expertise vs. similarity) × 2 appeals (expectancy vs. valuative) factorial experiment. Results show that there were conditional impacts of a similar source (peer) on favorable attitudes toward the PSAs. Messages were more effective when there was consistency between source characteristics and appeals (i.e., expert/expectancy and peer/valuative). The usefulness of Fishbein’s expectancy-value theory and the alternative framework for PSA developers are discussed.","PeriodicalId":43045,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Issues and Research In Advertising","volume":"40 1","pages":"147 - 170"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10641734.2018.1503112","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Issues and Research In Advertising","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2018.1503112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract Guided by a match-up hypothesis and Fishbein’s expectancy-value theory, this research examines the effects of message sources and appeals in anti-binge-drinking public service ads (PSAs) on college students' binge-drinking attitudes and behavioral intention. College students (N = 251) participated in a 2 sources (expertise vs. similarity) × 2 appeals (expectancy vs. valuative) factorial experiment. Results show that there were conditional impacts of a similar source (peer) on favorable attitudes toward the PSAs. Messages were more effective when there was consistency between source characteristics and appeals (i.e., expert/expectancy and peer/valuative). The usefulness of Fishbein’s expectancy-value theory and the alternative framework for PSA developers are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来源特征和信息诉求在公共服务广告信息中的作用——Fishbein期望值模型和匹配假说在大学生反暴饮运动中的应用
摘要本研究以匹配假说和Fishbein期望值理论为指导,考察了反酗酒公共服务广告中的信息来源和诉求对大学生酗酒态度和行为意向的影响。大学生(N = 251)参与了2个来源(专业知识与相似性) × 2个上诉(预期与评估)析因实验。结果表明,相似来源(同伴)对公益广告的有利态度存在条件影响。当来源特征和诉求(即专家/预期和同行/评估)一致时,信息更有效。讨论了Fishbein的期望值理论和PSA开发人员的替代框架的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
32.40%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
The Lost History of the American Academy of Advertising Exploring Persuasion Knowledge, Identity-Related Media Use, and Ad Skepticism of Black Immigrant and Refugee Adolescents Exploring Anti-Asian Racism Activism on Twitter during the Early Era of COVID-19 Hate Crimes: Implications for Marketers’ Social Purpose Communication Strategy Corporate Account As a New Endorser Developing Parasocial Relationships with Customers Modeling the Effects of Streamer Characteristics and Platform Affordances in Livestreaming E-Commerce: A Mixed-Methods Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1