Context effects in the L2: Evidence for compensatory mechanisms

IF 1.3 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS International Journal of Bilingualism Pub Date : 2023-03-06 DOI:10.1177/13670069231153301
Tal Norman, T. Degani
{"title":"Context effects in the L2: Evidence for compensatory mechanisms","authors":"Tal Norman, T. Degani","doi":"10.1177/13670069231153301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examined how context is used to facilitate reading in the second language (L2) compared with the first language (L1), and how L2 availability and age modulate these context effects. Using self-paced reading, participants read high- and low-constraint Hebrew sentences. In Experiment 1, L1 ( n = 45) and L2 ( n = 48) Hebrew readers were compared, whereas in Experiment 2, only L2 readers ( n = 131) were examined, testing modulations by L2 availability and age. Reading times of target, post target, and sentence final words were analyzed using linear-mixed-effects models. In Experiment 1, L2 readers differed from L1 readers in contextual processing, as evident in the significant interaction between context type and language background on the final word measure. In Experiment 2, L2 readers with lower L2 availability scores differed from those with higher scores, and younger readers differed from older ones, in the way high- and low-constraining context affected their reading behavior in the target word and in the final word of the sentence. These differences were indicated by significant interactions between context type and L2 availability as well as between context type and age group. These findings are best understood under a compensatory processing account. By complementing L1–L2 group comparisons with in-depth examination of the L2 profile, the current study reveals a continuous effect of L2 availability, such that a lower L2 availability is associated with a greater reliance on context. Furthermore, the inclusion of older and younger adults provides converging evidence to the use of contextual support as a compensatory mechanism when lexical processing is more effortful.","PeriodicalId":47574,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bilingualism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bilingualism","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069231153301","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examined how context is used to facilitate reading in the second language (L2) compared with the first language (L1), and how L2 availability and age modulate these context effects. Using self-paced reading, participants read high- and low-constraint Hebrew sentences. In Experiment 1, L1 ( n = 45) and L2 ( n = 48) Hebrew readers were compared, whereas in Experiment 2, only L2 readers ( n = 131) were examined, testing modulations by L2 availability and age. Reading times of target, post target, and sentence final words were analyzed using linear-mixed-effects models. In Experiment 1, L2 readers differed from L1 readers in contextual processing, as evident in the significant interaction between context type and language background on the final word measure. In Experiment 2, L2 readers with lower L2 availability scores differed from those with higher scores, and younger readers differed from older ones, in the way high- and low-constraining context affected their reading behavior in the target word and in the final word of the sentence. These differences were indicated by significant interactions between context type and L2 availability as well as between context type and age group. These findings are best understood under a compensatory processing account. By complementing L1–L2 group comparisons with in-depth examination of the L2 profile, the current study reveals a continuous effect of L2 availability, such that a lower L2 availability is associated with a greater reliance on context. Furthermore, the inclusion of older and younger adults provides converging evidence to the use of contextual support as a compensatory mechanism when lexical processing is more effortful.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第二语言中的语境效应:补偿机制的证据
我们研究了与第一语言(L1)相比,语境如何被用来促进第二语言(L2)的阅读,以及L2的可用性和年龄如何调节这些语境效应。使用自定节奏阅读,参与者阅读高约束和低约束的希伯来语句子。在实验1中,比较了L1 (n = 45)和L2 (n = 48)希伯来语读者,而在实验2中,只检查了L2读者(n = 131),测试了L2可用性和年龄的调节。采用线性-混合效应模型分析目标词、后目标词和句子末词的阅读次数。在实验1中,二语读者与母语读者在语境加工上存在差异,在最后一个词的测量中,语境类型和语言背景之间存在显著的交互作用。实验2中,高约束情境和低约束情境对目标词和句子最后一个词的阅读行为的影响不同于高约束情境和低约束情境对目标词和句子最后一个词的阅读行为的影响不同于高约束情境和低约束情境。这些差异表现在语境类型与第二语言可用性之间以及语境类型与年龄组之间的显著相互作用。这些发现在代偿加工解释下得到了最好的理解。通过对L2概况的深入研究来补充L1-L2组的比较,当前的研究揭示了L2可用性的持续影响,例如,较低的L2可用性与对上下文的更大依赖相关。此外,对老年人和年轻人的研究提供了越来越多的证据,表明当词汇加工更费力时,语境支持作为一种补偿机制的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Bilingualism is an international forum for the dissemination of original research on the linguistic, psychological, neurological, and social issues which emerge from language contact. While stressing interdisciplinary links, the focus of the Journal is on the language behavior of the bi- and multilingual individual.
期刊最新文献
Predicting language dominance in Spanish/English bilingual adults based on relative speech-in-speech recognition scores. Limited input and the acquisition of Finnish: The evolution of a child speaker in a multilingual environment Relative clause attachment preferences of late bilinguals Relations among degree of bilingualism and bilateral information processing in children and adults Dual drivers of bilingual semantic accent: Semantic relations and input limitations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1