Unplanned index hospital admissions among new older high-cost health care users in Ontario: a population-based matched cohort study.

CMAJ open Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20180185
S. Muratov, Justin Lee, A. Holbrook, J. Michael Paterson, J. R. Guertin, L. Mbuagbaw, T. Gomes, W. Khuu, P. Pequeno, J. Tarride
{"title":"Unplanned index hospital admissions among new older high-cost health care users in Ontario: a population-based matched cohort study.","authors":"S. Muratov, Justin Lee, A. Holbrook, J. Michael Paterson, J. R. Guertin, L. Mbuagbaw, T. Gomes, W. Khuu, P. Pequeno, J. Tarride","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20180185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nMost health care spending is concentrated within a small group of high-cost health care users. To inform health policies, we examined the characteristics of index hospital admissions and their predictors among incident older high-cost users compared to older non-high-cost users in Ontario.\n\n\nMETHODS\nUsing Ontario administrative data, we identified incident high-cost users aged 66 years or more and matched them 1:3 on age, gender and Local Health Integration Network with non-high-cost users aged 66 years or more. We defined high-cost users as patients within the top 5% most costly high-cost users during fiscal year 2013/14 but not during 2012/13. An index hospital admission, the main outcome, was defined as the first unplanned hospital admission during 2013/14, with no hospital admissions in the preceding 12 months. Descriptively, we analyzed the attributes of index hospital admissions, including costs. We identified predictors of index hospital admissions using stratified logistic regression.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOver half (95 375/175 847 [54.2%]) of all high-cost users had an unplanned index hospital admission, compared to 8838/527 541 (1.7%) of non-high-cost users. High-cost users had a poorer health status, longer acute length of stay (mean 7.5 d v. 2.9 d) and more frequent designation as alternate level of care before discharge (20.8% v. 1.7%) than did non-high-cost users. Ten diagnosis codes accounted for roughly one-third of the index hospital admission costs in both cohorts. Although many predictors were similar between the cohorts, a lower risk of an index hospital admission was associated with residence in long-term care, attachment to a primary care provider and recent consultation by a geriatrician among high-cost users.\n\n\nINTERPRETATION\nThe high prevalence of index hospital admissions and the corresponding costs are a distinctive feature of incident older high-cost users. Improved access to specialist outpatient care, home-based social care and long-term care when required are worth further investigation.","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.9778/cmajo.20180185","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20180185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

BACKGROUND Most health care spending is concentrated within a small group of high-cost health care users. To inform health policies, we examined the characteristics of index hospital admissions and their predictors among incident older high-cost users compared to older non-high-cost users in Ontario. METHODS Using Ontario administrative data, we identified incident high-cost users aged 66 years or more and matched them 1:3 on age, gender and Local Health Integration Network with non-high-cost users aged 66 years or more. We defined high-cost users as patients within the top 5% most costly high-cost users during fiscal year 2013/14 but not during 2012/13. An index hospital admission, the main outcome, was defined as the first unplanned hospital admission during 2013/14, with no hospital admissions in the preceding 12 months. Descriptively, we analyzed the attributes of index hospital admissions, including costs. We identified predictors of index hospital admissions using stratified logistic regression. RESULTS Over half (95 375/175 847 [54.2%]) of all high-cost users had an unplanned index hospital admission, compared to 8838/527 541 (1.7%) of non-high-cost users. High-cost users had a poorer health status, longer acute length of stay (mean 7.5 d v. 2.9 d) and more frequent designation as alternate level of care before discharge (20.8% v. 1.7%) than did non-high-cost users. Ten diagnosis codes accounted for roughly one-third of the index hospital admission costs in both cohorts. Although many predictors were similar between the cohorts, a lower risk of an index hospital admission was associated with residence in long-term care, attachment to a primary care provider and recent consultation by a geriatrician among high-cost users. INTERPRETATION The high prevalence of index hospital admissions and the corresponding costs are a distinctive feature of incident older high-cost users. Improved access to specialist outpatient care, home-based social care and long-term care when required are worth further investigation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安大略省新老年高成本医疗保健使用者的意外住院指数:一项基于人群的匹配队列研究
大多数医疗保健支出集中在一小部分高成本医疗保健使用者中。为了为卫生政策提供信息,我们研究了安大略省老年高费用使用者与老年非高费用使用者的住院指数特征及其预测因子。方法使用安大略省的管理数据,我们确定了66岁及以上的事件高成本用户,并将其与66岁及以上的非高成本用户在年龄、性别和当地健康整合网络上进行1:3匹配。我们将高成本用户定义为2013/14财年最高成本高成本用户前5%的患者,而不是2012/13财年。指数住院是主要结果,被定义为2013/14年度首次计划外住院,在过去12个月内没有住院。描述性地,我们分析了指数住院的属性,包括成本。我们使用分层逻辑回归确定指数住院的预测因子。结果超过一半(95 375/175 847[54.2%])的高费用用户有计划外指标住院,而非高费用用户的这一比例为8838/527 541(1.7%)。与非高费用用户相比,高费用用户的健康状况较差,急性住院时间较长(平均7.5 d对2.9 d),并且在出院前更频繁地指定为替代护理级别(20.8%对1.7%)。在两个队列中,十个诊断代码约占住院费用指数的三分之一。虽然许多预测因素在队列之间相似,但在高成本使用者中,住院指数风险较低与长期护理的居住、与初级保健提供者的联系以及最近与老年医学专家的咨询有关。结论:指数住院率和相应费用的高流行率是事件老年高费用使用者的显著特征。改善专科门诊护理、以家庭为基础的社会护理和必要时的长期护理的机会值得进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to "Validity of diagnoses of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Canadian administrative health data: a multiprovince, population-based cohort study". Neighbourhood deprivation, distance to nearest comprehensive stroke centre and access to endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke: a population-based study. Social determinants of access to timely elective surgery in Ontario, Canada: a cross-sectional population level study. The success of publicly funded rotavirus vaccine programs for preventing community- and hospital-acquired rotavirus infections in Canadian pediatric hospitals: an observational study. Trends in hospital coding for people experiencing homelessness in Canada, 2015-2020: a descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1