Heuristic Potential of Methodological Approaches to the Study of “Nature – Society” System

Nadezhda D. Subbotina, E. Zakharova
{"title":"Heuristic Potential of Methodological Approaches to the Study of “Nature – Society” System","authors":"Nadezhda D. Subbotina, E. Zakharova","doi":"10.21209/1996-7853-2022-17-4-69-82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the study is due, on the one hand, to the growing infl uence of society on nature, often leading to environmental problems, and, on the other hand, to insuffi cient understanding of the role of the natural foundations of human social behavior. The purpose of the article is to analyze the main methodological approaches to the study of the “nature – society” system and their potential for obtaining new knowledge. The article uses a historical approach: the well-known methodologies for studying this system are analyzed as they are introduced into scientifi c circulation, as well as a comparative approach: similarities and differences between the analyzed methodologies and the degree of their heuristicity are revealed. The article analyzes the methodological schemes by E. V. Girusov, V. A. Kobylyansky, N. D. Subbotina, E. Yu. Zakharova and others. The foreign authors K. Fuchs, R. Rees and R. Hambleton were selected, as their views, on the one hand, are very close to the theories of domestic specialists on this issue, on the other hand, they complement them. The authors conclude that almost all of the above methodological approaches are heuristic, they can be used to obtain new knowledge in this area of research. We suggest that these methodologies can be used to study a new phenomenon ‒ a digital system. The study is also of practical importance, as it argues that it is necessary to use these methodologies in the appraisal of social and technical projects.","PeriodicalId":33580,"journal":{"name":"Gumanitarnyi vektor","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gumanitarnyi vektor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21209/1996-7853-2022-17-4-69-82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of the study is due, on the one hand, to the growing infl uence of society on nature, often leading to environmental problems, and, on the other hand, to insuffi cient understanding of the role of the natural foundations of human social behavior. The purpose of the article is to analyze the main methodological approaches to the study of the “nature – society” system and their potential for obtaining new knowledge. The article uses a historical approach: the well-known methodologies for studying this system are analyzed as they are introduced into scientifi c circulation, as well as a comparative approach: similarities and differences between the analyzed methodologies and the degree of their heuristicity are revealed. The article analyzes the methodological schemes by E. V. Girusov, V. A. Kobylyansky, N. D. Subbotina, E. Yu. Zakharova and others. The foreign authors K. Fuchs, R. Rees and R. Hambleton were selected, as their views, on the one hand, are very close to the theories of domestic specialists on this issue, on the other hand, they complement them. The authors conclude that almost all of the above methodological approaches are heuristic, they can be used to obtain new knowledge in this area of research. We suggest that these methodologies can be used to study a new phenomenon ‒ a digital system. The study is also of practical importance, as it argues that it is necessary to use these methodologies in the appraisal of social and technical projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“自然-社会”系统方法论研究的启发式潜力
这项研究的相关性一方面是由于社会对自然的影响越来越大,经常导致环境问题,另一方面是因为对人类社会行为的自然基础的作用理解不足。本文的目的是分析研究“自然-社会”系统的主要方法论方法及其获取新知识的潜力。这篇文章使用了一种历史方法:在将研究该系统的著名方法引入科学循环时,对其进行了分析,并采用了一种比较方法:揭示了所分析的方法之间的异同及其启发性程度。本文分析了E.V.Girusov、V.A.Kobylyansky、N.D.Subbotina、E.Yu的方法论方案。扎哈罗娃等人。之所以选择外国作家K.Fuchs、R.Rees和R.Hambleton,一方面是因为他们的观点与国内专家在这一问题上的理论非常接近,另一方面是对他们的补充。作者得出的结论是,几乎所有上述方法论方法都是启发式的,它们可以用来获得这一研究领域的新知识。我们建议,这些方法可以用于研究一种新现象——数字系统。这项研究也具有实际意义,因为它认为有必要在评估社会和技术项目时使用这些方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Heuristic Potential of Methodological Approaches to the Study of “Nature – Society” System Problem of Personal Data Security and the Phenomenon of Post-Privacy in the Digital Society Digital Culture and Value Clash on TikTok: ‘Dancing Girl’ vs. Radical Feminist Traditional Values of Russian Society in the Digital Age Subjects of the “Knowledge Model of the Quality of Life” in the Concepts of Post-Industrialism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1