Reducing COVID-19 Racial Disparities: Why Some Counties Make Data-driven Decisions and Others Do Not?

IF 2.2 3区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Public Performance & Management Review Pub Date : 2022-07-22 DOI:10.1080/15309576.2022.2101131
Tamara Dimitrijevska-Markoski
{"title":"Reducing COVID-19 Racial Disparities: Why Some Counties Make Data-driven Decisions and Others Do Not?","authors":"Tamara Dimitrijevska-Markoski","doi":"10.1080/15309576.2022.2101131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Despite the progress in understanding the theoretical underpinnings behind governments’ use of performance information, there is limited understanding of whether governments use performance data to reduce racial and ethnic inequalities. This study uses the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study to examine what actions local governments have taken to remedy the disproportionally negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on racial and ethnic minorities. Specifically, the study examines the antecedents of the use of disaggregated performance data and studies the influence of the organizational culture and organizational learning on the use of disaggregated data in decision-making. An online survey was administered to 295 counties in the U.S., and the results indicate that attention dedicated to discussing and analyzing COVID-19 data and developmental organizational culture are positively associated with making data-driven decisions. Contrary to the widespread expectations, the percentage of minority population and prevalence of COVID-19 cases do not result in greater efforts to assist minorities in dealing with the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":47571,"journal":{"name":"Public Performance & Management Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Performance & Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2101131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Despite the progress in understanding the theoretical underpinnings behind governments’ use of performance information, there is limited understanding of whether governments use performance data to reduce racial and ethnic inequalities. This study uses the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study to examine what actions local governments have taken to remedy the disproportionally negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on racial and ethnic minorities. Specifically, the study examines the antecedents of the use of disaggregated performance data and studies the influence of the organizational culture and organizational learning on the use of disaggregated data in decision-making. An online survey was administered to 295 counties in the U.S., and the results indicate that attention dedicated to discussing and analyzing COVID-19 data and developmental organizational culture are positively associated with making data-driven decisions. Contrary to the widespread expectations, the percentage of minority population and prevalence of COVID-19 cases do not result in greater efforts to assist minorities in dealing with the pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少新冠肺炎种族差异:为什么一些县做出数据驱动的决定,而另一些县不这样做?
摘要尽管在理解政府使用绩效信息背后的理论基础方面取得了进展,但对政府是否使用绩效数据来减少种族和族裔不平等的理解有限。本研究以新冠肺炎疫情为案例研究,研究地方政府采取了哪些行动来弥补新冠肺炎疫情对少数种族和少数民族造成的不成比例的负面影响。具体而言,本研究考察了使用分类绩效数据的前因,并研究了组织文化和组织学习对决策中使用分类数据的影响。对美国295个县进行了一项在线调查,结果表明,专注于讨论和分析新冠肺炎数据和发展组织文化与做出数据驱动的决策正相关。与普遍预期相反,少数民族人口的百分比和新冠肺炎病例的流行率并没有导致为帮助少数民族应对疫情做出更大努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
16.10%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Public Performance & Management Review (PPMR) is a leading peer-reviewed academic journal that addresses a broad array of influential factors on the performance of public and nonprofit organizations. Its objectives are to: Advance theories on public governance, public management, and public performance; Facilitate the development of innovative techniques and to encourage a wider application of those already established; Stimulate research and critical thinking about the relationship between public and private management theories; Present integrated analyses of theories, concepts, strategies, and techniques dealing with performance, measurement, and related questions of organizational efficacy; and Provide a forum for practitioner-academic exchange. Continuing themes include, but are not limited to: managing for results, measuring and evaluating performance, designing accountability systems, improving budget strategies, managing human resources, building partnerships, facilitating citizen participation, applying new technologies, and improving public sector services and outcomes. Published since 1975, Public Performance & Management Review is a highly respected journal, receiving international ranking. Scholars and practitioners recognize it as a leading journal in the field of public administration.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Determinants of Adaptive Capacity: The Nonprofit Sector in the Turbulent COVID-19 Environment in Belarus and Ukraine Effect of Citizen Incivility on Self-Sacrifice of Public Service Motivation and Turnover Intention of Street-Level Bureaucrats: Mediating Effect of Emotional Exhaustion Where Do Citizens Place Blame for Service Delivery Failure? A Closer Look at Public-Private Partnerships Trust and Public Service Motivation The Influences of Ambidexterity, New Public Management and Innovation on the Public Service Quality of Government Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1