Knowledge Hiding and Hider's Innovative Behavior in Chinese Organizations: The Mediating Role of Silence Behavior and the Moderating Role of Zhongyong Thinking

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Management and Organization Review Pub Date : 2022-03-25 DOI:10.1017/mor.2021.76
Liangyong Chen, Xiaozhen Luo, Fei Zhou, Tianqi Zhang
{"title":"Knowledge Hiding and Hider's Innovative Behavior in Chinese Organizations: The Mediating Role of Silence Behavior and the Moderating Role of Zhongyong Thinking","authors":"Liangyong Chen, Xiaozhen Luo, Fei Zhou, Tianqi Zhang","doi":"10.1017/mor.2021.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Drawing from the theory of territorial behavior, this article predicts the explanatory role of silence behavior in the relationship between knowledge hiding and hider's innovative behavior in Chinese organizations, and the potential of Zhongyong thinking in mitigating the detrimental effect of knowledge hiding. Results derived from a time-lagged and multi-source survey support our hypotheses. Specifically, knowledge hiding is negatively associated with the innovative behavior of the hider. Silence behavior mediates the relationship between knowledge hiding and innovative behavior. Meanwhile, Zhongyong thinking moderates the positive relationship between knowledge hiding and silence behavior, as well as the indirect relationship between knowledge hiding and innovative behavior through silence behavior. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed based on these findings. 摘要 基于领地行为理论,本文提出沉默是中国人用于保护知识领地免受侵犯的预期性防御手段,但会抑制知识隐藏者的创新行为。本文同时考察了中庸思维在缓解知识隐藏对创新行为不利影响的可能作用。作者通过自评-他评结合的方式对239对员工-领导进行了三个阶段的问卷调查,结果表明,知识隐藏行为与隐藏者的创新行为有负面作用,而沉默在其中起到了部分中介作用。同时,中庸思维调节了知识隐藏与创新行为之间的直接负向关系以及知识隐藏通过沉默作用于创新行为的间接负向关系。最后,本文讨论了这些研究发现的理论和实践意义。","PeriodicalId":47798,"journal":{"name":"Management and Organization Review","volume":"18 1","pages":"491 - 518"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management and Organization Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2021.76","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Drawing from the theory of territorial behavior, this article predicts the explanatory role of silence behavior in the relationship between knowledge hiding and hider's innovative behavior in Chinese organizations, and the potential of Zhongyong thinking in mitigating the detrimental effect of knowledge hiding. Results derived from a time-lagged and multi-source survey support our hypotheses. Specifically, knowledge hiding is negatively associated with the innovative behavior of the hider. Silence behavior mediates the relationship between knowledge hiding and innovative behavior. Meanwhile, Zhongyong thinking moderates the positive relationship between knowledge hiding and silence behavior, as well as the indirect relationship between knowledge hiding and innovative behavior through silence behavior. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed based on these findings. 摘要 基于领地行为理论,本文提出沉默是中国人用于保护知识领地免受侵犯的预期性防御手段,但会抑制知识隐藏者的创新行为。本文同时考察了中庸思维在缓解知识隐藏对创新行为不利影响的可能作用。作者通过自评-他评结合的方式对239对员工-领导进行了三个阶段的问卷调查,结果表明,知识隐藏行为与隐藏者的创新行为有负面作用,而沉默在其中起到了部分中介作用。同时,中庸思维调节了知识隐藏与创新行为之间的直接负向关系以及知识隐藏通过沉默作用于创新行为的间接负向关系。最后,本文讨论了这些研究发现的理论和实践意义。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国组织中知识隐藏与隐藏者创新行为:沉默行为的中介作用和中庸思维的调节作用
本文从领域行为理论出发,预测了沉默行为在中国组织中知识隐藏与隐藏者创新行为关系中的解释作用,以及中庸思维在缓解知识隐藏不利影响方面的潜力。时间滞后和多来源调查的结果支持我们的假设。具体而言,知识隐藏与隐藏者的创新行为呈负相关。沉默行为在知识隐藏与创新行为之间起中介作用。同时,中庸思维调节了知识隐藏与沉默行为的正向关系,并通过沉默行为调节了知识隐藏与创新行为的间接关系。在此基础上讨论了理论和实践意义。摘要 基于领地行为理论,本文提出沉默是中国人用于保护知识领地免受侵犯的预期性防御手段,但会抑制知识隐藏者的创新行为。本文同时考察了中庸思维在缓解知识隐藏对创新行为不利影响的可能作用。作者通过自评-他评结合的方式对239对员工-领导进行了三个阶段的问卷调查,结果表明,知识隐藏行为与隐藏者的创新行为有负面作用,而沉默在其中起到了部分中介作用。同时,中庸思维调节了知识隐藏与创新行为之间的直接负向关系以及知识隐藏通过沉默作用于创新行为的间接负向关系。最后,本文讨论了这些研究发现的理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Responsible Research: Reflections of Two Business Scholars Doing Mental Health Research During COVID-19 Stretch Goals and Radical Creativity: Cognitive Flexibility as a Key Contingency Corporate Social Irresponsibility in Business: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Agenda Working with a Mask: How and When Workplace Mask Wearing Decreases Employee Emotional Exhaustion Commentary on Perspective Article: ‘Institutional Logics: Motivating Action and Overcoming Resistance to Change’ – Heather A. Haveman, David Joseph-Goteiner, and Danyang Li
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1