Abstract Life

IF 0.6 0 PHILOSOPHY Noema-Rivista Online di Filosofia Pub Date : 2022-11-20 DOI:10.54103/2239-5474/18846
K. Robinson
{"title":"Abstract Life","authors":"K. Robinson","doi":"10.54103/2239-5474/18846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I will argue that Deleuze, Whitehead and Bergson share a similar approach to abstraction, an approach that is fundamentally ‘pragmatist’ (broadly construed, close to James Williams’ ‘fantastic’ pragmatism). Leaning on William James one name for this shared approach methodologically is radical empiricism and is best understood in my view in the context of process philosophy. Although, they share a similar approach I will point out some differences between the radical empiricists in the way they think about some of their own key abstractions engaging the themes of relation, becoming and space-time. All three thinkers give us abstractions for thinking life as the creation of the new.","PeriodicalId":40388,"journal":{"name":"Noema-Rivista Online di Filosofia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noema-Rivista Online di Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54103/2239-5474/18846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper I will argue that Deleuze, Whitehead and Bergson share a similar approach to abstraction, an approach that is fundamentally ‘pragmatist’ (broadly construed, close to James Williams’ ‘fantastic’ pragmatism). Leaning on William James one name for this shared approach methodologically is radical empiricism and is best understood in my view in the context of process philosophy. Although, they share a similar approach I will point out some differences between the radical empiricists in the way they think about some of their own key abstractions engaging the themes of relation, becoming and space-time. All three thinkers give us abstractions for thinking life as the creation of the new.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抽象的生活
在这篇论文中,我认为德勒兹、怀特黑德和柏格森有着相似的抽象方法,这种方法从根本上来说是“实用主义者”(广义上讲,接近詹姆斯·威廉姆斯的“奇妙”实用主义)。在方法论上,这种共同方法的一个名字是激进经验主义,在我看来,这是在过程哲学的背景下最好理解的。尽管他们有着相似的方法,但我将指出激进经验主义者在思考自己的一些关键抽象概念时的一些差异,这些抽象涉及关系、成为和时空等主题。这三位思想家都为我们提供了将生活视为新事物创造的抽象概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Azione, prassi, storia Abstract Life Risonanze pragmaticistiche in T. Kuhn Practices and Practicing Toward a Pragmatist Account of Human Practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1