Comparison of plasma lipid profiles and atherogenic indices among hypertensives with or without type 2 diabetes

Q4 Medicine Sahel Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4103/smj.smj_37_19
M. Olamoyegun, O. Ala, S. Iwuala, B. Fawale
{"title":"Comparison of plasma lipid profiles and atherogenic indices among hypertensives with or without type 2 diabetes","authors":"M. Olamoyegun, O. Ala, S. Iwuala, B. Fawale","doi":"10.4103/smj.smj_37_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Several atherogenic indices derived from the lipid profiles are postulated to better detect dyslipidemias and predict the risk of having cardiovascular events even in the presence of insignificant changes in individual lipid parameters. Objective: To compare the lipid ratios and atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) to conventional atherogenic indices among hypertensive type 2 diabetics to hypertensive nondiabetes (HND) controls. Materials and Methods: A case–control study in which 210 participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus with hypertension (hypertensive-diabetic [HD]) compared with 150 (n = 155) hypertensive without diabetes (HND) with similar ages were enrolled. Blood samples for fasting lipid profile were collected and analyzed, and the following indices and ratios were calculated: (TC/high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol [HDL-C]), (low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol [LDL-C]/HDL-C), (HDL-C/LDL-C), and AIP. The indices were compared in both the participants and control group. Results: There was no significant difference in the clinical characteristics of HD compared to the HND except the systolic blood pressure, weight, and HDL-C which were lower in the HND group. The frequency of dyslipidemia was found to be significantly higher in the HD group except elevated LDL-C in males (25.8% vs. 17.4%, χ2 = 0.055, respectively). Furthermore, all the lipid ratios, except (Castelli risk index II [CRI– II] were found to be significantly different among HD as compared to HND group (P = 0.002, P = 0.045, respectively). Conclusions: This study concludes that Nigerians with both type 2 diabetes and hypertension have worse dyslipidemia and abnormal lipid ratios compared to those with only hypertension.","PeriodicalId":52324,"journal":{"name":"Sahel Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sahel Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/smj.smj_37_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several atherogenic indices derived from the lipid profiles are postulated to better detect dyslipidemias and predict the risk of having cardiovascular events even in the presence of insignificant changes in individual lipid parameters. Objective: To compare the lipid ratios and atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) to conventional atherogenic indices among hypertensive type 2 diabetics to hypertensive nondiabetes (HND) controls. Materials and Methods: A case–control study in which 210 participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus with hypertension (hypertensive-diabetic [HD]) compared with 150 (n = 155) hypertensive without diabetes (HND) with similar ages were enrolled. Blood samples for fasting lipid profile were collected and analyzed, and the following indices and ratios were calculated: (TC/high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol [HDL-C]), (low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol [LDL-C]/HDL-C), (HDL-C/LDL-C), and AIP. The indices were compared in both the participants and control group. Results: There was no significant difference in the clinical characteristics of HD compared to the HND except the systolic blood pressure, weight, and HDL-C which were lower in the HND group. The frequency of dyslipidemia was found to be significantly higher in the HD group except elevated LDL-C in males (25.8% vs. 17.4%, χ2 = 0.055, respectively). Furthermore, all the lipid ratios, except (Castelli risk index II [CRI– II] were found to be significantly different among HD as compared to HND group (P = 0.002, P = 0.045, respectively). Conclusions: This study concludes that Nigerians with both type 2 diabetes and hypertension have worse dyslipidemia and abnormal lipid ratios compared to those with only hypertension.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合并或不合并2型糖尿病的高血压患者血脂和动脉粥样硬化指数的比较
背景:即使在个体脂质参数发生微小变化的情况下,根据脂质谱得出的几种致动脉粥样硬化指数也可以更好地检测血脂异常并预测心血管事件的风险。目的:比较高血压2型糖尿病患者和高血压非糖尿病患者(HND)对照组的血脂比和血浆动脉粥样硬化指数(AIP)与传统动脉粥样硬化指数的关系。材料和方法:纳入一项病例对照研究,其中210名2型糖尿病伴高血压(高血压糖尿病[HD])参与者与150名年龄相似的无糖尿病高血压(HND)参与者进行了比较。采集并分析空腹血脂谱的血样,计算以下指标和比率:(TC/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇[HDL-C])、(低密度脂蛋白蛋白胆固醇[LDL-C]/HDL-C)、(HDL-C/LDL-C)和AIP。对参与者和对照组的指标进行了比较。结果:HD的临床特征与HND相比没有显著差异,除了HND组的收缩压、体重和HDL-C较低。除男性LDL-C升高外,HD组的血脂异常频率显著较高(分别为25.8%和17.4%,χ2=0.055)。此外,除(Castelli风险指数II[CRI–II]外,HD组与HND组的所有脂质比率均存在显著差异(分别为P=0.002和P=0.045)。结论:这项研究得出的结论是,与仅有高血压的尼日利亚人相比,同时患有2型糖尿病和高血压的尼日利亚人为更严重的血脂异常和脂质比率异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sahel Medical Journal
Sahel Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
47 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinico-Demographic characteristics, morbidity and mortality patterns of sickle cell disease in a tertiary institution Osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the obese patient: Do metabolic factors play a role? Effect of varying storage time and temperature on unspun blood samples for prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time in a tertiary hospital laboratory in the tropics Association between hormonal contraceptive use and derangement of lipid profile among women attending Muhoza Health Center, Rwanda Pattern of contraceptive choice among clients attending a tertiary health institution in Ogbomoso, Southwestern Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1