Pattern of contraceptive choice among clients attending a tertiary health institution in Ogbomoso, Southwestern Nigeria

Q4 Medicine Sahel Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.4103/smj.smj_5_20
O. Aworinde, D. Adekanle, O. Ilori, A. Adeyemi
{"title":"Pattern of contraceptive choice among clients attending a tertiary health institution in Ogbomoso, Southwestern Nigeria","authors":"O. Aworinde, D. Adekanle, O. Ilori, A. Adeyemi","doi":"10.4103/smj.smj_5_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is no ideal contraceptive method; therefore, likelihood of method choice shifts among clients from time to time. Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the most chosen modern contraceptive method, and the factors influencing that choice among clients attending a relatively new tertiary health institution in Southwestern Nigerian. Methods: A retrospective review of the case records of clients attending the family planning clinic of Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Teaching Hospital Ogbomoso, southwestern Nigeria, from January 2012 to December 2017. Results: Six hundred and twenty-nine clients accessed modern contraceptive methods during the study period. Their age ranged between 15 and 50 years with a mean of 33.0 ± 12.93. Most of the clients were married 616 (97.9%), had postsecondary education 405 (64.4%), and were of Christian faith 460 (73.1%). Progestogen-only injectable was the mostly chosen by the clients 228 (36.2%), and this is followed by intrauterine contraceptive device 186 (29.6%). Child spacing was the most common reason for contraception by the clients 357 (56.8%). Parity, postpartum contraception, previous contraceptive use, outcome of last delivery, mode of delivery of antecedent pregnancy, and educational status were all significantly associated with the mostly chosen method. Conclusion: Progestogen-only injectable contraceptive is the mostly chosen method among the clients, and this is a shift from what is obtained in southwestern Nigeria where intrauterine contraceptive device used to be the modern contraception method of choice.","PeriodicalId":52324,"journal":{"name":"Sahel Medical Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"37 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sahel Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/smj.smj_5_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is no ideal contraceptive method; therefore, likelihood of method choice shifts among clients from time to time. Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the most chosen modern contraceptive method, and the factors influencing that choice among clients attending a relatively new tertiary health institution in Southwestern Nigerian. Methods: A retrospective review of the case records of clients attending the family planning clinic of Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Teaching Hospital Ogbomoso, southwestern Nigeria, from January 2012 to December 2017. Results: Six hundred and twenty-nine clients accessed modern contraceptive methods during the study period. Their age ranged between 15 and 50 years with a mean of 33.0 ± 12.93. Most of the clients were married 616 (97.9%), had postsecondary education 405 (64.4%), and were of Christian faith 460 (73.1%). Progestogen-only injectable was the mostly chosen by the clients 228 (36.2%), and this is followed by intrauterine contraceptive device 186 (29.6%). Child spacing was the most common reason for contraception by the clients 357 (56.8%). Parity, postpartum contraception, previous contraceptive use, outcome of last delivery, mode of delivery of antecedent pregnancy, and educational status were all significantly associated with the mostly chosen method. Conclusion: Progestogen-only injectable contraceptive is the mostly chosen method among the clients, and this is a shift from what is obtained in southwestern Nigeria where intrauterine contraceptive device used to be the modern contraception method of choice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚西南部Ogbomoso一家三级卫生机构就诊者的避孕选择模式
背景:目前尚无理想的避孕方法;因此,方法选择的可能性在客户之间不时发生变化。目的:本研究的目的是在尼日利亚西南部一家相对较新的三级卫生机构的客户中确定最受欢迎的现代避孕方法,以及影响这种选择的因素。方法:回顾性分析2012年1月至2017年12月在尼日利亚西南部Ogbomoso Ladoke Akintola理工大学教学医院计划生育诊所就诊的患者的病例记录。结果:在研究期间,629名客户使用了现代避孕方法。年龄15~50岁,平均33.0±12.93岁。大多数客户已婚616人(97.9%),受过中学后教育405人(64.4%),信奉基督教460人(73.1%)。客户228人(36.2%)主要选择仅注射孕激素,其次是宫内节育器186人(29.6%)。生育间隔是客户357人(56.8%)避孕的最常见原因,既往避孕药的使用、最后一次分娩的结果、先前妊娠的分娩方式和教育状况都与主要选择的方法显著相关。结论:仅使用孕激素的注射避孕药是客户最常选择的方法,这与尼日利亚西南部的避孕方法有所不同,在那里,宫内节育器曾经是现代避孕方法的首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sahel Medical Journal
Sahel Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
47 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinico-Demographic characteristics, morbidity and mortality patterns of sickle cell disease in a tertiary institution Osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the obese patient: Do metabolic factors play a role? Effect of varying storage time and temperature on unspun blood samples for prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time in a tertiary hospital laboratory in the tropics Association between hormonal contraceptive use and derangement of lipid profile among women attending Muhoza Health Center, Rwanda Pattern of contraceptive choice among clients attending a tertiary health institution in Ogbomoso, Southwestern Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1