Barriers and enablers to the moderation of self-harm content for a young person's online forum.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-16 DOI:10.1080/09638237.2022.2069721
Rachel Perowne, Leslie Morrison Gutman
{"title":"Barriers and enablers to the moderation of self-harm content for a young person's online forum.","authors":"Rachel Perowne, Leslie Morrison Gutman","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2022.2069721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-harm amongst young people in the United Kingdom is higher than in other European countries. Young people who self-harm are often reluctant to seek professional help, turning increasingly to the internet for support, including online forums. There are concerns about misinformation or harmful content being shared, potentially leading to self-harm contagion. Moderation of online forums can reduce risks, improving forum safety. Moderation of self-harm content, however, is an under-researched area.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Using the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW), this study examines the barriers and enablers to moderation of self-harm content and suggests behaviour change techniques (BCTs) to address barriers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative interviews with 8 moderators (of a total of 16) from the UK's leading young people's support service for under 25s, The Mix, were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thematic analysis identified eleven enablers, four barriers and one both an enabler and a barrier. Barriers included emotional exhaustion, working with partial information, access to timely support, vagueness within the guidelines and influence of community users. BCTs selected included increasing social support through a moderation buddy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Optimisation strategies focus on increasing the support and level of information available to moderators and could be considered by other organisations providing similar services.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":"1 1","pages":"357-365"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2022.2069721","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Self-harm amongst young people in the United Kingdom is higher than in other European countries. Young people who self-harm are often reluctant to seek professional help, turning increasingly to the internet for support, including online forums. There are concerns about misinformation or harmful content being shared, potentially leading to self-harm contagion. Moderation of online forums can reduce risks, improving forum safety. Moderation of self-harm content, however, is an under-researched area.

Aims: Using the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW), this study examines the barriers and enablers to moderation of self-harm content and suggests behaviour change techniques (BCTs) to address barriers.

Method: Qualitative interviews with 8 moderators (of a total of 16) from the UK's leading young people's support service for under 25s, The Mix, were conducted.

Results: Thematic analysis identified eleven enablers, four barriers and one both an enabler and a barrier. Barriers included emotional exhaustion, working with partial information, access to timely support, vagueness within the guidelines and influence of community users. BCTs selected included increasing social support through a moderation buddy.

Conclusions: Optimisation strategies focus on increasing the support and level of information available to moderators and could be considered by other organisations providing similar services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年在线论坛自我伤害内容节制的障碍和推动因素。
背景:英国年轻人的自残率高于其他欧洲国家。自残的年轻人往往不愿寻求专业帮助,他们越来越多地转向互联网寻求支持,包括在线论坛。人们担心错误信息或有害内容被分享,可能导致自残传染。网络论坛的适度管理可以降低风险,提高论坛的安全性。然而,自我伤害内容的节制是一个研究不足的领域。目的使用行为改变轮(BCW),本研究考察了自我伤害内容节制的障碍和促成因素,并提出了行为改变技术(bct)来解决障碍。方法对来自英国领先的25岁以下年轻人支持服务机构the Mix的8位主持人(共16位)进行了定性访谈。结果专题分析确定了11个促进因素、4个障碍因素和1个既促进又障碍因素。障碍包括情绪疲惫、工作时信息不完整、无法获得及时支持、准则不明确以及社区用户的影响。选择的bct包括通过适度伙伴增加社会支持。优化策略侧重于增加版主可获得的支持和信息水平,其他提供类似服务的组织可以考虑这一策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
期刊最新文献
Mental health literacy in secondary school teachers and interventions to improve it - a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Changes in sex differences in mental health over time: the moderating effects of educational status and loneliness. Statement of Retraction: Evaluation of the impact of a self-stigma reduction programme on psychosocial outcomes among people with schizophrenia spectrum disorder. The impact of social support on university students living with mental illness: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. The effectiveness of digital health technologies for reducing substance use among young people: a systematic review & meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1