Selective and indicated UK school-based mental health interventions: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Mental Health Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1080/09638237.2025.2460118
Liam Spencer, Scarlett Carling, Tomos Robinson, Katie Thomson, Eileen Kaner
{"title":"Selective and indicated UK school-based mental health interventions: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.","authors":"Liam Spencer, Scarlett Carling, Tomos Robinson, Katie Thomson, Eileen Kaner","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2025.2460118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mental health disorders amongst children and young people pose a significant burden, with a growing emphasis on early intervention. A notable gap exists between the prevalence of these disorders and sufficiently early treatment, emphasising the need for effective preventive measures.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This review aims to comprehensively assess and narratively synthesise both quantitative and qualitative literature on secondary preventative (indicated and selective) school-based mental health interventions in the UK.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>All empirical studies published since 2010, which reported on UK secondary preventative school-based interventions were eligible. Eligible studies were identified by searching the following electronic databases: PsycINFO (Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus (Elsevier), EMBASE (Elsevier), ERIC (EBSCO), and Web of Science (Clarivate). Database searches yielded 3269 results, with 26 articles meeting inclusion criteria. These articles covered 22 unique studies encompassing various study designs. The Mixed Method Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to assess study quality, and study findings were synthesised using a single narrative synthesis ('storytelling') approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three central themes emerged: (1) Outcomes for children and young people; (2) acceptability and preferences; and (3) practical considerations. The majority of included studies demonstrated high quality. Studies revealed diverse perspectives on the strengths, limitations, barriers, and facilitators of school-based interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>School-based interventions hold promise in promoting positive mental health amongst young people, emphasising the pivotal role of educational settings in addressing these challenges. Despite encouraging outcomes, this review highlights the need for further research to better understand intervention effectiveness, implementation barriers, and cost-effectiveness; to facilitate the development of tailored and impactful strategies for supporting young people's mental health.</p><p><strong>Prisma/prospero statement: </strong>This systematic review was conducted following Cochrane methodology PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered with PROSPERO in June 2023 (CRD42023431966).</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2025.2460118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mental health disorders amongst children and young people pose a significant burden, with a growing emphasis on early intervention. A notable gap exists between the prevalence of these disorders and sufficiently early treatment, emphasising the need for effective preventive measures.

Aims: This review aims to comprehensively assess and narratively synthesise both quantitative and qualitative literature on secondary preventative (indicated and selective) school-based mental health interventions in the UK.

Method: All empirical studies published since 2010, which reported on UK secondary preventative school-based interventions were eligible. Eligible studies were identified by searching the following electronic databases: PsycINFO (Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus (Elsevier), EMBASE (Elsevier), ERIC (EBSCO), and Web of Science (Clarivate). Database searches yielded 3269 results, with 26 articles meeting inclusion criteria. These articles covered 22 unique studies encompassing various study designs. The Mixed Method Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to assess study quality, and study findings were synthesised using a single narrative synthesis ('storytelling') approach.

Results: Three central themes emerged: (1) Outcomes for children and young people; (2) acceptability and preferences; and (3) practical considerations. The majority of included studies demonstrated high quality. Studies revealed diverse perspectives on the strengths, limitations, barriers, and facilitators of school-based interventions.

Conclusions: School-based interventions hold promise in promoting positive mental health amongst young people, emphasising the pivotal role of educational settings in addressing these challenges. Despite encouraging outcomes, this review highlights the need for further research to better understand intervention effectiveness, implementation barriers, and cost-effectiveness; to facilitate the development of tailored and impactful strategies for supporting young people's mental health.

Prisma/prospero statement: This systematic review was conducted following Cochrane methodology PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered with PROSPERO in June 2023 (CRD42023431966).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国校本心理健康干预措施的选择性和适用性:系统回顾和叙述性综合。
背景:儿童和青少年的心理健康失调是一个沉重的负担,人们越来越重视早期干预。目的:本综述旨在全面评估和叙述性综合有关英国二级预防性(指示性和选择性)校本心理健康干预措施的定量和定性文献:自 2010 年以来发表的所有实证研究均符合条件,这些研究报告涉及英国中学预防性校本干预措施。通过搜索以下电子数据库确定了符合条件的研究:PsycINFO(Ovid)、MEDLINE(Ovid)、Scopus(Elsevier)、EMBASE(Elsevier)、ERIC(EBSCO)和 Web of Science(Clarivate)。数据库搜索结果共 3269 条,26 篇文章符合纳入标准。这些文章涉及 22 项独特的研究,包括各种研究设计。采用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)评估研究质量,并采用单一叙事综合法("讲故事")对研究结果进行综合:出现了三个中心主题:(1) 儿童和青少年的结果;(2) 可接受性和偏好;(3) 实际考虑因素。所纳入的大多数研究都具有较高的质量。研究揭示了校本干预的优势、局限性、障碍和促进因素的不同观点:校本干预在促进青少年积极心理健康方面大有可为,强调了教育环境在应对这些挑战中的关键作用。尽管取得了令人鼓舞的成果,但本综述强调了进一步研究的必要性,以更好地了解干预措施的有效性、实施障碍和成本效益;从而促进制定量身定制的、有影响力的策略,为青少年的心理健康提供支持:本系统综述遵循 Cochrane 方法 PRISMA 指南进行。该综述于 2023 年 6 月在 PROSPERO 注册(CRD42023431966)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
期刊最新文献
Does perceived social cohesion moderate the effect of parental stressors on depressive symptoms? A longitudinal, multi-level analysis before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Selective and indicated UK school-based mental health interventions: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Stigma perpetuation at the interface of mental health care: a review to compare patient and clinician perspectives of stigma and borderline personality disorder. Healthcare professional disclosure of mental illness in the workplace: a rapid scoping review. Interventions that support unpaid carers of adult mental health inpatients: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1