New Perspectives on Political Consumerism and Consumption: An Editorial Essay

Jörg Lindenmeier, S. Rivaroli
{"title":"New Perspectives on Political Consumerism and Consumption: An Editorial Essay","authors":"Jörg Lindenmeier, S. Rivaroli","doi":"10.1080/10495142.2020.1865241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are honored to be acting as guest editors of this special issue of the Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, in which we introduce studies from authors who come from different countries to contribute to deepen and broaden the understanding of the subject of the political consumerism. Recently, many studies on political consumerism and consumption have been published (Copeland, 2014b; Copeland & Boulianne, 2020; Gotlieb & Cheema, 2017; Gundelach, 2020; Saraiva et al., 2020; Stolle et al., 2013). However, and up to now, the research in the field of business administration and marketing is not very consistent and does not show a coherent picture. Thus, this call for papers was inspired by the following questions: What is the role of both nonprofit and public organizations as well as for-profit companies to harness the individual motivation to become a “political consumer”? And what are the resulting implications? Modern societies are experiencing an increasing trend which sees consumers use the shopping bag to move from being “passive consumers to becoming active citizens [. . .] to becoming rebels with a cause” (Hastings, 2017, p. 231). According to Sassatelli (2009), consumers’ daily actions charged with political meaning and aiming at promoting economic, social and environmental changes are aptly defined by the term political consumerism. We assume that political consumerism refers to consumer behavior patterns that are characterized by stable and conscious ethical or moral motivations. Moreover, and contrary to the mainstream consumer behavior, which is often founded on self-centered egoistic interests, political consumerism is concurrently driven by private and collective motives (Micheletti, 2003; Micheletti & Stolle, 2012). If one takes a simple perspective, political consumerism includes two typical forms of consumer’s actions: Boycotting (i.e., refraining from buying unethical products and","PeriodicalId":46735,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing","volume":"33 1","pages":"109 - 113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10495142.2020.1865241","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2020.1865241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We are honored to be acting as guest editors of this special issue of the Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, in which we introduce studies from authors who come from different countries to contribute to deepen and broaden the understanding of the subject of the political consumerism. Recently, many studies on political consumerism and consumption have been published (Copeland, 2014b; Copeland & Boulianne, 2020; Gotlieb & Cheema, 2017; Gundelach, 2020; Saraiva et al., 2020; Stolle et al., 2013). However, and up to now, the research in the field of business administration and marketing is not very consistent and does not show a coherent picture. Thus, this call for papers was inspired by the following questions: What is the role of both nonprofit and public organizations as well as for-profit companies to harness the individual motivation to become a “political consumer”? And what are the resulting implications? Modern societies are experiencing an increasing trend which sees consumers use the shopping bag to move from being “passive consumers to becoming active citizens [. . .] to becoming rebels with a cause” (Hastings, 2017, p. 231). According to Sassatelli (2009), consumers’ daily actions charged with political meaning and aiming at promoting economic, social and environmental changes are aptly defined by the term political consumerism. We assume that political consumerism refers to consumer behavior patterns that are characterized by stable and conscious ethical or moral motivations. Moreover, and contrary to the mainstream consumer behavior, which is often founded on self-centered egoistic interests, political consumerism is concurrently driven by private and collective motives (Micheletti, 2003; Micheletti & Stolle, 2012). If one takes a simple perspective, political consumerism includes two typical forms of consumer’s actions: Boycotting (i.e., refraining from buying unethical products and
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治消费主义与消费的新视角:一篇评论文章
我们很荣幸能担任《非营利与公共部门营销杂志》特刊的客座编辑,在该特刊中,我们介绍了来自不同国家的作者的研究,以加深和拓宽对政治消费主义主题的理解。最近,许多关于政治消费主义和消费的研究已经发表(Copeland,2014b;Copeland&Boulianne,2020;Gotlieb&Cheema,2017;冈德拉赫,2020;Saraiva等人,2020;Stolle等人,2013)。然而,到目前为止,工商管理和市场营销领域的研究并不是很一致,也没有显示出连贯的画面。因此,这篇论文的呼吁受到了以下问题的启发:非营利组织和公共组织以及营利性公司在利用个人动机成为“政治消费者”方面的作用是什么?由此产生的影响是什么?现代社会正经历着一种日益增长的趋势,消费者使用购物袋从“被动的消费者转变为积极的公民[…],转变为有事业的反叛者”(Hastings,2017,第231页)。根据Sassateli(2009)的说法,消费者的日常行为具有政治意义,旨在促进经济、社会和环境变化,这一术语被恰当地定义为政治消费主义。我们假设政治消费主义是指以稳定和有意识的伦理或道德动机为特征的消费者行为模式。此外,与通常建立在以自我为中心的利己主义利益之上的主流消费者行为相反,政治消费主义同时受到私人和集体动机的驱动(Micheletti,2003;Micheletti和Stolle,2012年)。如果从一个简单的角度来看,政治消费主义包括两种典型的消费者行为形式:抵制(即避免购买不道德的产品和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Conceptualizing Barriers to Individual Recycling: A Qualitative Study with Multiple Stakeholders in Türkiye Nonprofits, Social Media, and Mission Sympathy and Guilt: Optimizing Advertising Appeals for Charitable Giving to Generation Z Do Top managers’ Psychological Attributes Influence Nonprofit Alliances for Resource Acquisition? An Application of Stimulus-Organization-Behavior-Consequence (S-O-B-C) Theory Using Social Media as a Marketing Communication Strategy: Perspectives from Health-Related Non-Profit Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1