Differences in breast cancer diagnosis by patient presentation in Ontario: a retrospective cohort study

CMAJ open Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20210254
S. Habbous, E. Homenauth, A. Barisic, Sharmilaa Kandasamy, V. Majpruz, K. Forster, M. Yurcan, A. Chiarelli, P. Groome, C. Holloway, A. Eisen
{"title":"Differences in breast cancer diagnosis by patient presentation in Ontario: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"S. Habbous, E. Homenauth, A. Barisic, Sharmilaa Kandasamy, V. Majpruz, K. Forster, M. Yurcan, A. Chiarelli, P. Groome, C. Holloway, A. Eisen","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In Ontario, patients with breast cancer typically receive their diagnoses through the Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP) after an abnormal screen, through screening initiated by a primary care provider or other referring physician, or through follow-up of symptoms by patients’ primary care providers. We sought to explore the association of the route to diagnosis (screening within or outside the OBSP or via symptomatic presentation) with use of OBSP-affiliated breast assessment sites (O-BAS), wait times until diagnosis or treatment, health care use and overall survival for patients with breast cancer. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we used the Ontario Cancer Registry to identify adults (aged 18–105 yr) who received a diagnosis of breast cancer from 2013 to 2017. We excluded patients if they were not Ontario residents or had missing age or sex, or who died before diagnosis. We used logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with categorical variables (whether patients were or were not referred to an OBAS, whether patients were screened or symptomatic) and Cox proportional hazards regression to identify factors associated with all-cause mortality. Results: Of 51 460 patients with breast cancer, 42 598 (83%) received their diagnoses at an O-BAS. Patients whose cancer was first detected through the OBSP were more likely than symptomatic patients to be given a diagnosis at an O-BAS (adjusted odds ratio 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.57 to 1.80). Patients screened by the OBSP were given their diagnoses 1 month earlier than symptomatic patients, but diagnosis at an O-BAS did not affect the time until either diagnosis or treatment. Patients referred to an O-BAS had significantly better overall survival than those who were not referred (adjusted hazard ratio 0.73, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.80). Interpretation: Patients screened through the OBSP were given their diagnoses earlier than symptomatic patients and were more likely to be referred to an O-BAS, which was associated with better survival. Our findings suggest that individuals with signs and symptoms of breast cancer would benefit from similar referral processes, oversight and standards to those used by the OBSP.","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: In Ontario, patients with breast cancer typically receive their diagnoses through the Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP) after an abnormal screen, through screening initiated by a primary care provider or other referring physician, or through follow-up of symptoms by patients’ primary care providers. We sought to explore the association of the route to diagnosis (screening within or outside the OBSP or via symptomatic presentation) with use of OBSP-affiliated breast assessment sites (O-BAS), wait times until diagnosis or treatment, health care use and overall survival for patients with breast cancer. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we used the Ontario Cancer Registry to identify adults (aged 18–105 yr) who received a diagnosis of breast cancer from 2013 to 2017. We excluded patients if they were not Ontario residents or had missing age or sex, or who died before diagnosis. We used logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with categorical variables (whether patients were or were not referred to an OBAS, whether patients were screened or symptomatic) and Cox proportional hazards regression to identify factors associated with all-cause mortality. Results: Of 51 460 patients with breast cancer, 42 598 (83%) received their diagnoses at an O-BAS. Patients whose cancer was first detected through the OBSP were more likely than symptomatic patients to be given a diagnosis at an O-BAS (adjusted odds ratio 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.57 to 1.80). Patients screened by the OBSP were given their diagnoses 1 month earlier than symptomatic patients, but diagnosis at an O-BAS did not affect the time until either diagnosis or treatment. Patients referred to an O-BAS had significantly better overall survival than those who were not referred (adjusted hazard ratio 0.73, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.80). Interpretation: Patients screened through the OBSP were given their diagnoses earlier than symptomatic patients and were more likely to be referred to an O-BAS, which was associated with better survival. Our findings suggest that individuals with signs and symptoms of breast cancer would benefit from similar referral processes, oversight and standards to those used by the OBSP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安大略省患者表现对乳腺癌诊断的差异:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:在安大略省,癌症乳腺癌患者通常在筛查异常后,通过安大略省乳腺筛查计划(OBSP),通过初级保健提供者或其他转诊医生启动的筛查,或通过患者初级保健提供者对症状的跟踪,获得诊断。我们试图探索诊断途径(在OBSP内或外进行筛查或通过症状表现进行筛查)与使用OBSP附属乳腺评估位点(O-BAS)、诊断或治疗前的等待时间、医疗保健使用和癌症患者的总体生存率之间的关联。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们使用安大略省癌症登记处来确定2013年至2017年被诊断为癌症的成年人(18-105岁)。我们排除了非安大略省居民、年龄或性别缺失或在诊断前死亡的患者。我们使用逻辑回归来评估与分类变量相关的因素(患者是否被转诊到OBAS,患者是否被筛查或有症状),并使用Cox比例风险回归来确定与全因死亡率相关的因素。结果:在51460名癌症患者中,42598人(83%)在O-BAS接受了诊断。首次通过OBSP检测到癌症的患者比有症状的患者更有可能在O-BAS中得到诊断(调整后的比值比1.68,95%置信区间[CI]1.57-1.80)。通过OBSP筛查的患者比症状患者提前1个月得到诊断,但在O-BAS诊断或治疗前的时间不受影响。转诊O-BAS的患者的总生存率明显高于未转诊的患者(调整后的危险比为0.73,95%CI为0.66至0.80)。解释:通过OBSP筛查的患者比有症状的患者更早得到诊断,更有可能转诊至O-BAS,这与更好的生存率有关。我们的研究结果表明,有癌症体征和症状的个体将受益于与OBSP使用的转诊流程、监督和标准相似的转诊过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to "Validity of diagnoses of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Canadian administrative health data: a multiprovince, population-based cohort study". Neighbourhood deprivation, distance to nearest comprehensive stroke centre and access to endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke: a population-based study. Social determinants of access to timely elective surgery in Ontario, Canada: a cross-sectional population level study. The success of publicly funded rotavirus vaccine programs for preventing community- and hospital-acquired rotavirus infections in Canadian pediatric hospitals: an observational study. Trends in hospital coding for people experiencing homelessness in Canada, 2015-2020: a descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1