Knowledge management effectiveness model in facilitating generation differences

IF 3.2 4区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Knowledge Management Research & Practice Pub Date : 2022-10-06 DOI:10.1080/14778238.2022.2129494
M. Andriani, Alvin Christiandy, I. Wiratmadja, I. Sunaryo
{"title":"Knowledge management effectiveness model in facilitating generation differences","authors":"M. Andriani, Alvin Christiandy, I. Wiratmadja, I. Sunaryo","doi":"10.1080/14778238.2022.2129494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study aims to develop an evaluation model of knowledge management effectiveness based on generational differences. Different generations have different learning styles and needs in accessing and disseminating knowledge. On the other hand, knowledge management’s role in companies in the digital era is critical. Therefore, the company needs to build an effective knowledge management system to maintain its life. This research was conducted through in-depth literature studies on the characteristics of generations X, Y, and Z, and the knowledge management effectiveness model, followed by the development of the knowledge management effectiveness model, and conducted empirical measurement using an explanatory sequential mixed-method in Indonesian automotive company. Three differences determine intergenerational knowledge management’s effectiveness: knowledge management’s support for productivity, training, and leadership. Companies need to pay attention to different employees’ needs to improve knowledge management effectiveness and prioritise features that can facilitate intergenerational differences.","PeriodicalId":51497,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Management Research & Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":"947 - 959"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Management Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2022.2129494","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aims to develop an evaluation model of knowledge management effectiveness based on generational differences. Different generations have different learning styles and needs in accessing and disseminating knowledge. On the other hand, knowledge management’s role in companies in the digital era is critical. Therefore, the company needs to build an effective knowledge management system to maintain its life. This research was conducted through in-depth literature studies on the characteristics of generations X, Y, and Z, and the knowledge management effectiveness model, followed by the development of the knowledge management effectiveness model, and conducted empirical measurement using an explanatory sequential mixed-method in Indonesian automotive company. Three differences determine intergenerational knowledge management’s effectiveness: knowledge management’s support for productivity, training, and leadership. Companies need to pay attention to different employees’ needs to improve knowledge management effectiveness and prioritise features that can facilitate intergenerational differences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进代际差异的知识管理有效性模型
摘要本研究旨在建立一个基于代际差异的知识管理有效性评估模型。不同世代在获取和传播知识方面有不同的学习方式和需求。另一方面,知识管理在数字化时代企业中的作用至关重要。因此,公司需要建立一个有效的知识管理体系来维持其生命。本研究通过对X、Y和Z世代的特征以及知识管理有效性模型进行深入的文献研究,然后开发知识管理有效率模型,并使用解释性序列混合方法在印尼汽车公司进行实证测量。三个差异决定了代际知识管理的有效性:知识管理对生产力、培训和领导力的支持。公司需要关注不同员工的需求,以提高知识管理的有效性,并优先考虑可能促进代际差异的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
15.60%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Knowledge management is a term that has worked its way into the mainstream of both academic and business arenas since it was first coined in the 1980s. Interest has increased rapidly during the last decade and shows no signs of abating. The current state of the knowledge management field is that it encompasses four overlapping areas: •Managing knowledge (creating/acquiring, sharing, retaining, storing, using, updating, retiring) •Organisational learning •Intellectual capital •Knowledge economics Within (and across) these, knowledge management has to address issues relating to technology, people, culture and systems.
期刊最新文献
From authentic leadership to knowledge sharing and knowledge worker retention: mediating role of psychological empowerment Every coin has two sides: The application of artificial intelligence on employees’ unethical behaviours Sustainable leadership and knowledge ingredients - the recipe for sustainable competitive advantage: a mixed-method approach Relational social capital and tacit knowledge sharing: the mediation of P-O fit and POS Digital transformation through organisational unlearning: insights from practitioners’ voice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1