{"title":"ALEKSANDER GIEYSZTOR, THE FIRST DIRECTOR\nOF THE ROYAL CASTLE IN WARSAW","authors":"Przemysław Mrozowski","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0014.3515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aleksander Gieysztor (1916–1999) was\nunquestionably one of the most outstanding representatives\nof the Polish humanities in the 20th century. He considered\nhimself a historian, and his basic workplace was the\nHistorical Institute of the University of Warsaw, while his\nresearch focused around mediaeval culture. He became\na museum professional slightly against his own will, in the\nlast decades of his career, when taking on the position of\nthe Director of the rebuilt Royal Castle in Warsaw. Despite\nthinking of himself as a historian, Gieysztor was well\nprepared to exert the function, since he had always been\nextremely interested in artistic sources, as important and\nclear as a historiographer’s narrative or a chronicler’s note.\nNot only did numerous publications testify to his interest,\nbut he also formulated the programme of the Team for the\nResearch into the Beginnings of the Polish State, which he\nheaded in 1948–1955. Owing to its historical and symbolical\nsignificance, the Warsaw Castle took an important position\nin Gieysztor’s career. He was by Stanisław Lorentz’s side\nfrom the very beginning, supporting him in his efforts to\nhave the Castle rebuilt, the project neglected by Poland’s\nCommunist authorities. Having become member of the\nCivil Committee for Rebuilding the Royal Castle, Gieysztor\nheaded its Archaeological-Historical section. From 1973\nhe became member of the so-called Castle Curator Board:\na team which collegially managed the Castle. Esthetical\nsensitivity and artistic erudition, as well as a thorough\nknowledge of old-Polish culture provided Gieysztor with\nan excellent background to fit with the group of scholars\ndecisive for the shape and educational programme of the\nreconstructed Castle; later, individually, they allowed him\nto find satisfaction in the role of the Director heading its\nfurbishing. Gieysztor acknowledged this project to have\nbeen his greatest intellectual challenge in the last decades\nof his academic career. However, he regarded it as his duty:\nservice to society longing for symbols to shape its historical\nidentity.\n\n","PeriodicalId":36577,"journal":{"name":"Muzealnictwo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muzealnictwo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.3515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aleksander Gieysztor (1916–1999) was
unquestionably one of the most outstanding representatives
of the Polish humanities in the 20th century. He considered
himself a historian, and his basic workplace was the
Historical Institute of the University of Warsaw, while his
research focused around mediaeval culture. He became
a museum professional slightly against his own will, in the
last decades of his career, when taking on the position of
the Director of the rebuilt Royal Castle in Warsaw. Despite
thinking of himself as a historian, Gieysztor was well
prepared to exert the function, since he had always been
extremely interested in artistic sources, as important and
clear as a historiographer’s narrative or a chronicler’s note.
Not only did numerous publications testify to his interest,
but he also formulated the programme of the Team for the
Research into the Beginnings of the Polish State, which he
headed in 1948–1955. Owing to its historical and symbolical
significance, the Warsaw Castle took an important position
in Gieysztor’s career. He was by Stanisław Lorentz’s side
from the very beginning, supporting him in his efforts to
have the Castle rebuilt, the project neglected by Poland’s
Communist authorities. Having become member of the
Civil Committee for Rebuilding the Royal Castle, Gieysztor
headed its Archaeological-Historical section. From 1973
he became member of the so-called Castle Curator Board:
a team which collegially managed the Castle. Esthetical
sensitivity and artistic erudition, as well as a thorough
knowledge of old-Polish culture provided Gieysztor with
an excellent background to fit with the group of scholars
decisive for the shape and educational programme of the
reconstructed Castle; later, individually, they allowed him
to find satisfaction in the role of the Director heading its
furbishing. Gieysztor acknowledged this project to have
been his greatest intellectual challenge in the last decades
of his academic career. However, he regarded it as his duty:
service to society longing for symbols to shape its historical
identity.