Achieving Mutual Understanding Without Saying a Word: The Conceptualization of Moqi and a Nomological Network

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Management and Organization Review Pub Date : 2022-05-16 DOI:10.1017/mor.2022.9
Xiao-Ping Chen, Benjamin M. Cole
{"title":"Achieving Mutual Understanding Without Saying a Word: The Conceptualization of Moqi and a Nomological Network","authors":"Xiao-Ping Chen, Benjamin M. Cole","doi":"10.1017/mor.2022.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT While the construct of moqi (默契, pronounced ‘mò-chee’) is ubiquitously understood and finds itself in everyday conversations around the home and workplace in China, the theoretical development of moqi has been scarce. In this article, we expand on prior work on moqi and conceptualize moqi as a dyadic level construct that describes a situated state of shared contextualized understanding without saying a word between two counterparties. We further articulate a broader view of moqi as a dyadic communication construct that is both target-specific and situation-specific. We propose a nomological network of moqi that shows how shared contextualized understandings between counterparties are informed by several different layers, including ‘capability’ (a) a generalized proclivity to be able to form such understandings with others, and ‘contributing factors’, (b) how those understandings are formed either (i) through interactions or (ii) without them through overlaps in background characteristics or experiences, and (c) how other factors accentuate the capability and inclination to ultimately achieve moqi. We then discuss several potential consequences of moqi in organizational settings. Finally, we discuss why moqi is a powerful form of effective communication that is meaningful beyond the Chinese cultural context. 摘要 虽然默契这个词在中国广为人知,但是对于默契的理论构建却极为罕见。本文将默契定义为在特定情景中两个人无需语言就彼此理解的状态。默契是一个二人层面、而不是个体层面的概念,它具有情景特定性和目标特定性。本文认为,有几个个体因素能够帮助两个人达成默契:(1)个体具有与他人形成共享理解的倾向和能力,(2)二人之间交往的深度,(3)二人在各种背景特征和人生经历上的重合程度。与此同时,也有其他的环境因素会通过影响上述个体因素而最终对默契的达成造成影响。本文接着讨论了默契在组织情境中可能产生的几个后果,并强调默契是一种非常有效的沟通方式,应该在中国文化之外也有重要意义。","PeriodicalId":47798,"journal":{"name":"Management and Organization Review","volume":"19 1","pages":"3 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management and Organization Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2022.9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT While the construct of moqi (默契, pronounced ‘mò-chee’) is ubiquitously understood and finds itself in everyday conversations around the home and workplace in China, the theoretical development of moqi has been scarce. In this article, we expand on prior work on moqi and conceptualize moqi as a dyadic level construct that describes a situated state of shared contextualized understanding without saying a word between two counterparties. We further articulate a broader view of moqi as a dyadic communication construct that is both target-specific and situation-specific. We propose a nomological network of moqi that shows how shared contextualized understandings between counterparties are informed by several different layers, including ‘capability’ (a) a generalized proclivity to be able to form such understandings with others, and ‘contributing factors’, (b) how those understandings are formed either (i) through interactions or (ii) without them through overlaps in background characteristics or experiences, and (c) how other factors accentuate the capability and inclination to ultimately achieve moqi. We then discuss several potential consequences of moqi in organizational settings. Finally, we discuss why moqi is a powerful form of effective communication that is meaningful beyond the Chinese cultural context. 摘要 虽然默契这个词在中国广为人知,但是对于默契的理论构建却极为罕见。本文将默契定义为在特定情景中两个人无需语言就彼此理解的状态。默契是一个二人层面、而不是个体层面的概念,它具有情景特定性和目标特定性。本文认为,有几个个体因素能够帮助两个人达成默契:(1)个体具有与他人形成共享理解的倾向和能力,(2)二人之间交往的深度,(3)二人在各种背景特征和人生经历上的重合程度。与此同时,也有其他的环境因素会通过影响上述个体因素而最终对默契的达成造成影响。本文接着讨论了默契在组织情境中可能产生的几个后果,并强调默契是一种非常有效的沟通方式,应该在中国文化之外也有重要意义。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一言难尽:墨气的概念化与法理学网络
ABSTRACT While the construction of moqi (tacit understanding'm ò - che ') is ubiquitously understood and finds itself in every conversation around the home and workplace in China, the theoretical development of moqi has been scaled In this article, we expand on prior work on moqi and conceptualize moqi as a dynamic level construct that describes a sited state of shared contextualized understanding without saying a word between two counterparties We further articulate a browser view of moqi as a dynamic communication construct that is both target specific and situation specific We propose a nomological network of moqi that shows how shared contextualized understandings between counterparts are informed by several different layers, including 'capability' (a) a generalized proclivity to be able to form such understandings with others, and 'contributing factors', (b) How these understandings are formed either (i) through interactions or (ii) without them covering in background characteristics or experiences, and (c) how other factors account for the capability and inclusion to ultimate achievement moqi We then discuss several potential sequences of moqi in organizational settings Finally, we discuss why moqi is a powerful form of effective communication that is meaningful beyond the Chinese cultural context Although the term 'tacit agreement' is widely known in China, the theoretical construction of tacit agreement is extremely rare. This article defines tacit understanding as the state in which two people understand each other without the need for language in a specific situation. Tacit understanding is a concept at the level of two individuals, rather than an individual level, which has situational and goal specificity. This article believes that there are several individual factors that can help two individuals reach a tacit understanding: (1) individuals have a tendency and ability to form shared understanding with others, (2) the depth of interaction between the two, and (3) the degree of overlap between the two in various background characteristics and life experiences. At the same time, there are also other environmental factors that can ultimately affect the achievement of tacit agreement by influencing the individual factors mentioned above. This article then discusses several possible consequences of tacit understanding in organizational contexts, and emphasizes that tacit understanding is a very effective communication method that should also have important significance beyond Chinese culture.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Responsible Research: Reflections of Two Business Scholars Doing Mental Health Research During COVID-19 Stretch Goals and Radical Creativity: Cognitive Flexibility as a Key Contingency Corporate Social Irresponsibility in Business: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Agenda Working with a Mask: How and When Workplace Mask Wearing Decreases Employee Emotional Exhaustion Commentary on Perspective Article: ‘Institutional Logics: Motivating Action and Overcoming Resistance to Change’ – Heather A. Haveman, David Joseph-Goteiner, and Danyang Li
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1