Scenario-based measurement of interest rate risks

IF 5.7 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Risk Finance Pub Date : 2021-05-31 DOI:10.1108/JRF-11-2020-0228
Sebastian Schlütter
{"title":"Scenario-based measurement of interest rate risks","authors":"Sebastian Schlütter","doi":"10.1108/JRF-11-2020-0228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper aims to propose a scenario-based approach for measuring interest rate risks. Many regulatory capital standards in banking and insurance make use of similar approaches. The authors provide a theoretical justification and extensive backtesting of our approach.Design/methodology/approachThe authors theoretically derive a scenario-based value-at-risk for interest rate risks based on a principal component analysis. The authors calibrate their approach based on the Nelson–Siegel model, which is modified to account for lower bounds for interest rates. The authors backtest the model outcomes against historical yield curve changes for a large number of generated asset–liability portfolios. In addition, the authors backtest the scenario-based value-at-risk against the stochastic model.FindingsThe backtesting results of the adjusted Nelson–Siegel model (accounting for a lower bound) are similar to those of the traditional Nelson–Siegel model. The suitability of the scenario-based value-at-risk can be substantially improved by allowing for correlation parameters in the aggregation of the scenario outcomes. Implementing those parameters is straightforward with the replacement of Pearson correlations by value-at-risk-implied tail correlations in situations where risk factors are not elliptically distributed.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper assumes deterministic cash flow patterns. The authors discuss the applicability of their approach, e.g. for insurance companies.Practical implicationsThe authors’ approach can be used to better communicate interest rate risks using scenarios. Discussing risk measurement results with decision makers can help to backtest stochastic-term structure models.Originality/valueThe authors’ adjustment of the Nelson–Siegel model to account for lower bounds makes the model more useful in the current low-yield environment when unjustifiably high negative interest rates need to be avoided. The proposed scenario-based value-at-risk allows for a pragmatic measurement of interest rate risks, which nevertheless closely approximates the value-at-risk according to the stochastic model.","PeriodicalId":46579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk Finance","volume":"22 1","pages":"56-77"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Risk Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-11-2020-0228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to propose a scenario-based approach for measuring interest rate risks. Many regulatory capital standards in banking and insurance make use of similar approaches. The authors provide a theoretical justification and extensive backtesting of our approach.Design/methodology/approachThe authors theoretically derive a scenario-based value-at-risk for interest rate risks based on a principal component analysis. The authors calibrate their approach based on the Nelson–Siegel model, which is modified to account for lower bounds for interest rates. The authors backtest the model outcomes against historical yield curve changes for a large number of generated asset–liability portfolios. In addition, the authors backtest the scenario-based value-at-risk against the stochastic model.FindingsThe backtesting results of the adjusted Nelson–Siegel model (accounting for a lower bound) are similar to those of the traditional Nelson–Siegel model. The suitability of the scenario-based value-at-risk can be substantially improved by allowing for correlation parameters in the aggregation of the scenario outcomes. Implementing those parameters is straightforward with the replacement of Pearson correlations by value-at-risk-implied tail correlations in situations where risk factors are not elliptically distributed.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper assumes deterministic cash flow patterns. The authors discuss the applicability of their approach, e.g. for insurance companies.Practical implicationsThe authors’ approach can be used to better communicate interest rate risks using scenarios. Discussing risk measurement results with decision makers can help to backtest stochastic-term structure models.Originality/valueThe authors’ adjustment of the Nelson–Siegel model to account for lower bounds makes the model more useful in the current low-yield environment when unjustifiably high negative interest rates need to be avoided. The proposed scenario-based value-at-risk allows for a pragmatic measurement of interest rate risks, which nevertheless closely approximates the value-at-risk according to the stochastic model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于情景的利率风险衡量
目的本文旨在提出一种基于情景的利率风险度量方法。银行业和保险业的许多监管资本标准都采用了类似的方法。作者对我们的方法进行了理论论证和广泛的回溯测试。设计/方法论/方法作者基于主成分分析从理论上推导出利率风险的基于情景的风险值。作者根据Nelson–Siegel模型校准了他们的方法,该模型经过了修改,以考虑利率的下限。作者针对大量生成的资产负债组合的历史收益率曲线变化对模型结果进行了回溯测试。此外,作者将基于情景的风险值与随机模型进行了回溯测试。结果调整后的Nelson–Siegel模型(考虑下限)的回测结果与传统的Nelson-Siegel模式相似。通过在场景结果的聚合中考虑相关参数,可以显著提高基于场景的风险值的适用性。在风险因素不是椭圆分布的情况下,用风险值隐含的尾部相关性代替Pearson相关性,可以直接实现这些参数。研究局限性/含义本文假设了确定性现金流模式。作者讨论了他们的方法的适用性,例如对保险公司的适用性。实际含义作者的方法可以用于使用场景更好地传达利率风险。与决策者讨论风险度量结果有助于对随机期限结构模型进行回溯测试。独创性/价值作者对Nelson–Siegel模型进行了调整,以解释下限,这使得该模型在当前的低收益率环境中更有用,此时需要避免不合理的高负利率。所提出的基于情景的风险价值允许对利率风险进行务实的测量,尽管如此,根据随机模型,利率风险与风险价值非常接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Risk Finance
Journal of Risk Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Journal of Risk Finance provides a rigorous forum for the publication of high quality peer-reviewed theoretical and empirical research articles, by both academic and industry experts, related to financial risks and risk management. Articles, including review articles, empirical and conceptual, which display thoughtful, accurate research and be rigorous in all regards, are most welcome on the following topics: -Securitization; derivatives and structured financial products -Financial risk management -Regulation of risk management -Risk and corporate governance -Liability management -Systemic risk -Cryptocurrency and risk management -Credit arbitrage methods -Corporate social responsibility and risk management -Enterprise risk management -FinTech and risk -Insurtech -Regtech -Blockchain and risk -Climate change and risk
期刊最新文献
Contagion in the Euro area sovereign CDS market: a spatial approach Environment, social and governance (ESG) performance and CDS spreads: the role of country sustainability Spillover effects of CEO performance-induced removal on competitor CEOs' firms' financial policies Capital structure and default risk of small and medium enterprises: evidence from Algeria Rippling effect of liquidity risk in the sovereign term structure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1