Rippling effect of liquidity risk in the sovereign term structure

IF 5.7 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Risk Finance Pub Date : 2023-06-19 DOI:10.1108/jrf-05-2022-0119
Rintu Anthony, Krishna Prasanna
{"title":"Rippling effect of liquidity risk in the sovereign term structure","authors":"Rintu Anthony, Krishna Prasanna","doi":"10.1108/jrf-05-2022-0119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe study attempts to identify the linkages in the term structure of illiquidity and the impact of global and domestic factors on sovereign bonds in emerging Asia. The objective of the study ensues on defining the direction of illiquidity spillover across bonds of varying tenors.Design/methodology/approachThis study explores the joint dynamics of contemporary liquidity risk premia and its time-varying effect on the term structure spectrum using the Diebold and Yilmaz (2012) spillover framework.FindingsA substantial relationship was found to exist between the liquidity of bonds with closer terms to maturity. The macroeconomic environment primarily impacts the liquidity of 10-year bonds, and they spiral down to the subsequent bond liquidity, exhibiting a rippling effect. The authors further show that the direction of liquidity shock transmission is from long- to medium- and thence to short-term bonds. Among the global factors, foreign investments and S & P 500 VIX significantly affect the liquidity of 10-year bonds.Research limitations/implicationsThe study has several implications for academicians, policymakers and domestic and global investment professionals. The drivers of liquidity risk and the transmission across the term structure help investors in designing efficient portfolio diversification strategies. The results are relevant for cross-border investors in the valuation of emerging Asian sovereign bonds while deciding on asset allocations and hedging strategies. The monetary regulators strive on a continuous basis to improve the liquidity in sovereign bond markets in order to ensure efficient funding of development activities. This study finds that short-term bonds are more liquid than long-term bonds. Their auction framework with higher series of short-term bond issues helps to provide the required liquidity in the markets.Practical implicationsThe term structure of illiquidity is upward sloping, inferring a higher underlying liquidity risk of long-term bonds compared to short-term bonds. This finding suggests that a higher representation of short-term bonds in the auction framework helps to enhance the overall market liquidity.Originality/valueThis study offers insights into the debate on the shape of the term structure of illiquidity and the point of origination of liquidity shocks. Further, the direction of spillover across a wide spectrum of bonds is also demonstrated.","PeriodicalId":46579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Risk Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jrf-05-2022-0119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe study attempts to identify the linkages in the term structure of illiquidity and the impact of global and domestic factors on sovereign bonds in emerging Asia. The objective of the study ensues on defining the direction of illiquidity spillover across bonds of varying tenors.Design/methodology/approachThis study explores the joint dynamics of contemporary liquidity risk premia and its time-varying effect on the term structure spectrum using the Diebold and Yilmaz (2012) spillover framework.FindingsA substantial relationship was found to exist between the liquidity of bonds with closer terms to maturity. The macroeconomic environment primarily impacts the liquidity of 10-year bonds, and they spiral down to the subsequent bond liquidity, exhibiting a rippling effect. The authors further show that the direction of liquidity shock transmission is from long- to medium- and thence to short-term bonds. Among the global factors, foreign investments and S & P 500 VIX significantly affect the liquidity of 10-year bonds.Research limitations/implicationsThe study has several implications for academicians, policymakers and domestic and global investment professionals. The drivers of liquidity risk and the transmission across the term structure help investors in designing efficient portfolio diversification strategies. The results are relevant for cross-border investors in the valuation of emerging Asian sovereign bonds while deciding on asset allocations and hedging strategies. The monetary regulators strive on a continuous basis to improve the liquidity in sovereign bond markets in order to ensure efficient funding of development activities. This study finds that short-term bonds are more liquid than long-term bonds. Their auction framework with higher series of short-term bond issues helps to provide the required liquidity in the markets.Practical implicationsThe term structure of illiquidity is upward sloping, inferring a higher underlying liquidity risk of long-term bonds compared to short-term bonds. This finding suggests that a higher representation of short-term bonds in the auction framework helps to enhance the overall market liquidity.Originality/valueThis study offers insights into the debate on the shape of the term structure of illiquidity and the point of origination of liquidity shocks. Further, the direction of spillover across a wide spectrum of bonds is also demonstrated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主权期限结构中流动性风险的涟漪效应
目的本研究试图确定非流动性的期限结构与全球和国内因素对新兴亚洲主权债券的影响之间的联系。本研究的目的是确定不同期限债券的非流动性溢出方向。设计/方法论/方法本研究使用Diebold和Yilmaz(2012)溢出框架探讨了当代流动性风险溢价的联合动态及其对期限结构谱的时变影响。研究发现,期限较近的债券的流动性之间存在实质性关系。宏观经济环境主要影响10年期债券的流动性,并螺旋下降到随后的债券流动性,表现出连锁反应。作者进一步指出,流动性冲击的传导方向是从长期到中期,再到短期债券。在全球因素中,外国投资和标准普尔500指数波动率显著影响10年期债券的流动性。研究局限性/含义该研究对学者、政策制定者以及国内外投资专业人士有几点启示。流动性风险的驱动因素和跨期限结构的传导有助于投资者设计有效的投资组合多元化策略。这一结果与跨境投资者在决定资产配置和对冲策略时对新兴亚洲主权债券的估值有关。货币监管机构不断努力提高主权债券市场的流动性,以确保有效地为发展活动提供资金。这项研究发现,短期债券比长期债券更具流动性。他们的拍卖框架和更高系列的短期债券发行有助于在市场上提供所需的流动性。实际含义非流动性的期限结构是向上倾斜的,这表明与短期债券相比,长期债券的潜在流动性风险更高。这一发现表明,短期债券在拍卖框架中的代表性越高,有助于提高整体市场流动性。原创性/价值本研究深入探讨了关于非流动性期限结构的形式和流动性冲击的起源点的争论。此外,还证明了广泛债券的溢出方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Risk Finance
Journal of Risk Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Journal of Risk Finance provides a rigorous forum for the publication of high quality peer-reviewed theoretical and empirical research articles, by both academic and industry experts, related to financial risks and risk management. Articles, including review articles, empirical and conceptual, which display thoughtful, accurate research and be rigorous in all regards, are most welcome on the following topics: -Securitization; derivatives and structured financial products -Financial risk management -Regulation of risk management -Risk and corporate governance -Liability management -Systemic risk -Cryptocurrency and risk management -Credit arbitrage methods -Corporate social responsibility and risk management -Enterprise risk management -FinTech and risk -Insurtech -Regtech -Blockchain and risk -Climate change and risk
期刊最新文献
Contagion in the Euro area sovereign CDS market: a spatial approach Environment, social and governance (ESG) performance and CDS spreads: the role of country sustainability Spillover effects of CEO performance-induced removal on competitor CEOs' firms' financial policies Capital structure and default risk of small and medium enterprises: evidence from Algeria Rippling effect of liquidity risk in the sovereign term structure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1