{"title":"Swinburne, Africa, and the Lash","authors":"Mark D. Scroggins","doi":"10.53397/hunnu.jflc.202002002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Algernon Charles Swinburne’s late poems encouraging Britain’s aggression against the Boer States are exercises in imperialist jingoism, and seem at odds with the poet’s longstanding Republicanism and advocacy of individual rights. A close examination of Swinburne’s notorious involvement in practices of sado-masochist flagellation, however, casts some light on how these poems can be read as congruent with his earlier ideological investments. The rhetoric of his Boer War poems is precisely aligned with his earlier responses to the Bulgarian Crisis of 1876 and the Eyre Affair of 1865; in both of these moments, Swinburne’s political reaction is keyed to his aversion to the use of the lash (by the Russians in the former, by the British colonial Jamaican regime in the latter). While Swinburne was something of a connoiseur of passive flagellation—to the extent that birching becomes sometimes a metaphor for poetry itself—the act of deploying the lash against an unwilling subject (as the Boers did to their African workers) is for him the epitome of tyranny and dehumanization.","PeriodicalId":65200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Languages and Cultures","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Languages and Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53397/hunnu.jflc.202002002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Algernon Charles Swinburne’s late poems encouraging Britain’s aggression against the Boer States are exercises in imperialist jingoism, and seem at odds with the poet’s longstanding Republicanism and advocacy of individual rights. A close examination of Swinburne’s notorious involvement in practices of sado-masochist flagellation, however, casts some light on how these poems can be read as congruent with his earlier ideological investments. The rhetoric of his Boer War poems is precisely aligned with his earlier responses to the Bulgarian Crisis of 1876 and the Eyre Affair of 1865; in both of these moments, Swinburne’s political reaction is keyed to his aversion to the use of the lash (by the Russians in the former, by the British colonial Jamaican regime in the latter). While Swinburne was something of a connoiseur of passive flagellation—to the extent that birching becomes sometimes a metaphor for poetry itself—the act of deploying the lash against an unwilling subject (as the Boers did to their African workers) is for him the epitome of tyranny and dehumanization.
阿尔杰农·查尔斯·斯温伯恩(Algernon Charles Swinburne)晚期鼓励英国侵略布尔邦的诗歌是帝国主义沙文主义的演习,似乎与这位诗人长期以来的共和主义和对个人权利的倡导不一致。然而,仔细研究斯温伯恩臭名昭著的施虐受虐狂鞭笞行为,可以发现这些诗歌如何被解读为与他早期的意识形态投资相一致。他的布尔战争诗歌的修辞手法与他早期对1876年保加利亚危机和1865年艾尔事件的回应完全一致;在这两个时刻,斯温伯恩的政治反应都与他对使用鞭笞的厌恶有关(前者是俄罗斯人,后者是英国殖民地牙买加政权)。虽然斯温伯恩是被动鞭笞的鉴赏家——在某种程度上,桦树有时会成为诗歌本身的隐喻——但对一个不情愿的主体进行鞭笞(就像布尔人对他们的非洲工人所做的那样)的行为对他来说是暴政和非人化的缩影。