Licentious Fictions: Ninjō and the Nineteenth-Century Japanese Novel by Daniel Poch (review)

IF 0.5 4区 历史学 0 ASIAN STUDIES HARVARD JOURNAL OF ASIATIC STUDIES Pub Date : 2022-11-09 DOI:10.1353/jas.2021.0001
Timothy J. Van Compernolle
{"title":"Licentious Fictions: Ninjō and the Nineteenth-Century Japanese Novel by Daniel Poch (review)","authors":"Timothy J. Van Compernolle","doi":"10.1353/jas.2021.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An essay I read in graduate school—Peter Kornicki’s “The Survival of Tokugawa Fiction in the Meiji Period,” published forty years ago in this very journal—provided me with my first intimation that early modern Japanese literature was still popular in the modern era.1 It has taken the field considerable time to take seriously and to explore fully the implications of this survival, but the effort to find continuity amid change across the once unbridgeable Tokugawa–Meiji divide has now gained a great deal of traction. Daniel Poch’s Licentious Fictions, a bold, ambitious, and deeply researched monograph, takes a prominent place among these studies. Focusing on the historically specific discourse about ninjō 人情 (lit. human emotion; treated in the book as a form of desire), Poch’s book traces the “narrative practices surrounding ninjō” (p. 4) across a long nineteenth century, from the late Tokugawa era to the final decade of the Meiji period. Its focal points are the literary projects of Kyokutei Bakin 曲亭馬琴 (1767–1848), Tsubouchi Shōyō 坪内逍遥 (1859–1935), and Natsume Sōseki 夏目漱石 (1867–1916). The book details the need to unleash the representation of desire in fiction, as well as the urge to control its unruly aspects, with a didactic framework that legitimizes some expressions of desire while making others illicit. The specifics of these impulses differ depending on the writer and the historical era. Poch’s book is adept at handling the variability and historical specificity of these twin claims on fiction to unleash and control desires. It also convincingly reveals continuity across the entire century. Poch’s attention to historical specificity is evident in chapter 1, which presents a wide-ranging account of the “interlocked historical layers that informed the understanding of ninjō in the nineteenthcentury Japanese novel” (p. 29). This historically specific discourse on desire was influenced by the import of vernacular Chinese fiction into","PeriodicalId":29948,"journal":{"name":"HARVARD JOURNAL OF ASIATIC STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HARVARD JOURNAL OF ASIATIC STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jas.2021.0001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An essay I read in graduate school—Peter Kornicki’s “The Survival of Tokugawa Fiction in the Meiji Period,” published forty years ago in this very journal—provided me with my first intimation that early modern Japanese literature was still popular in the modern era.1 It has taken the field considerable time to take seriously and to explore fully the implications of this survival, but the effort to find continuity amid change across the once unbridgeable Tokugawa–Meiji divide has now gained a great deal of traction. Daniel Poch’s Licentious Fictions, a bold, ambitious, and deeply researched monograph, takes a prominent place among these studies. Focusing on the historically specific discourse about ninjō 人情 (lit. human emotion; treated in the book as a form of desire), Poch’s book traces the “narrative practices surrounding ninjō” (p. 4) across a long nineteenth century, from the late Tokugawa era to the final decade of the Meiji period. Its focal points are the literary projects of Kyokutei Bakin 曲亭馬琴 (1767–1848), Tsubouchi Shōyō 坪内逍遥 (1859–1935), and Natsume Sōseki 夏目漱石 (1867–1916). The book details the need to unleash the representation of desire in fiction, as well as the urge to control its unruly aspects, with a didactic framework that legitimizes some expressions of desire while making others illicit. The specifics of these impulses differ depending on the writer and the historical era. Poch’s book is adept at handling the variability and historical specificity of these twin claims on fiction to unleash and control desires. It also convincingly reveals continuity across the entire century. Poch’s attention to historical specificity is evident in chapter 1, which presents a wide-ranging account of the “interlocked historical layers that informed the understanding of ninjō in the nineteenthcentury Japanese novel” (p. 29). This historically specific discourse on desire was influenced by the import of vernacular Chinese fiction into
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹尼尔·波奇的授权小说:《忍者与十九世纪日本小说》(评论)
我在研究生院读到的一篇文章——彼得·科尔尼基四十年前在这本杂志上发表的《明治时期德川家康小说的生存》——让我第一次意识到,早期现代日本文学在现代仍然很流行,但是,在曾经无法弥合的德川幕府和明治之间的分歧中寻找连续性的努力,现在已经获得了很大的吸引力。丹尼尔·波奇的《授权小说》是一部大胆、雄心勃勃、深入研究的专著,在这些研究中占有突出地位。关注关于ninjō的历史特定话语人情 波奇的书追溯了从德川家康时代晚期到明治时代最后十年的漫长的十九世纪“围绕忍者的叙事实践”(第4页)。它的焦点是巴金的文学项目曲亭馬琴 (1767-1848)坪内逍遥 (1859年-1935年)和夏目夏石夏目漱石 (1867-11916)。这本书详细描述了在小说中释放欲望表现的必要性,以及控制其难以控制的方面的冲动,并采用了一种说教的框架,使一些欲望表达合法化,而另一些则是非法的。这些冲动的具体内容因作者和历史时代而异。波奇的书善于处理这两种关于小说释放和控制欲望的说法的可变性和历史特异性。它还令人信服地揭示了整个世纪的连续性。波奇对历史特殊性的关注在第1章中表现得很明显,该章对“在19世纪的日本小说中,相互关联的历史层为理解ninjō提供了信息”进行了广泛的描述(第29页)。这种特定于历史的关于欲望的论述受到了中国白话小说的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Preface In Search of Our Frontier: Japanese America and Settler Colonialism in the Construction of Japan’s Borderless Empire by Eiichiro Azuma (review) Buddhist Responses to Christianity in Postwar Taiwan: Awakening the World by Scott Pacey (review) Slave Donations to Buddhist Parishes in Qing Mongolia Licentious Fictions: Ninjō and the Nineteenth-Century Japanese Novel by Daniel Poch (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1