Comparative evaluation of antibacterial efficacy of chlorhexidine mouthwash and Momordica charantia, Spinacia oleracea mouthwash against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus spp., and Porphyromonas gingivalis − An in vitro study

Q3 Dentistry Journal of Orofacial Sciences Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jofs.jofs_115_23
Krishna S Kadam, Niraj S. Gokhale, S. Hugar, Neha Kohli, Suneel S. Dodamani, S. Tendulkar
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of antibacterial efficacy of chlorhexidine mouthwash and Momordica charantia, Spinacia oleracea mouthwash against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus spp., and Porphyromonas gingivalis − An in vitro study","authors":"Krishna S Kadam, Niraj S. Gokhale, S. Hugar, Neha Kohli, Suneel S. Dodamani, S. Tendulkar","doi":"10.4103/jofs.jofs_115_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Various advances have been made in pharmacology and synthetic organic chemistry, the dependency on natural products, particularly on herbs, remains relatively unchanged. Among various herbal products that are being used in dentistry, efficacy of mouthwash prepared using Momordica charantia extract and Spinacia oleracea extract on prevention of caries in children has not been researched yet. Hence, in this study the antibacterial efficacy of chlorhexidine mouthwash was evaluated and compared with Momordica charantia, Spinacia oleracea mouthwash against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus, Porphyromonas gingivalis. To evaluate and compare the antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine mouthwash and Momordica charantia, Spinacia oleracea mouthwash against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Porphyromonas gingivalis. Materials and Methods: Ethanolic extract of Momordica charantia and Spinacia oleracea was prepared. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of these extracts were then determined against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Porphyromonas gingivalis using resazurin method and agar plate streaking method. Herbal mouthwashes were then prepared from the extracts using MIC and MBC values and its cytotoxicity was determined using MTT assay. Antibacterial susceptibility was then determined using agar well diffusion method and time-kill assay. Results: There is no statistically significant difference in the effectiveness of chlorhexidine mouthwash and Momordica charantia, Spinacia oleracea mouthwash against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Porphyromonas gingivalis. Conclusion: Momordica charantia extract mouthwash and Spinacia oleracea extract mouthwash can be used as an herbal alternative as it has equal antibacterial efficacy against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Porphyromonas gingivalis as compared to 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash.","PeriodicalId":16651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orofacial Sciences","volume":"15 1","pages":"76 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orofacial Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jofs.jofs_115_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Various advances have been made in pharmacology and synthetic organic chemistry, the dependency on natural products, particularly on herbs, remains relatively unchanged. Among various herbal products that are being used in dentistry, efficacy of mouthwash prepared using Momordica charantia extract and Spinacia oleracea extract on prevention of caries in children has not been researched yet. Hence, in this study the antibacterial efficacy of chlorhexidine mouthwash was evaluated and compared with Momordica charantia, Spinacia oleracea mouthwash against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus, Porphyromonas gingivalis. To evaluate and compare the antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine mouthwash and Momordica charantia, Spinacia oleracea mouthwash against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Porphyromonas gingivalis. Materials and Methods: Ethanolic extract of Momordica charantia and Spinacia oleracea was prepared. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of these extracts were then determined against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Porphyromonas gingivalis using resazurin method and agar plate streaking method. Herbal mouthwashes were then prepared from the extracts using MIC and MBC values and its cytotoxicity was determined using MTT assay. Antibacterial susceptibility was then determined using agar well diffusion method and time-kill assay. Results: There is no statistically significant difference in the effectiveness of chlorhexidine mouthwash and Momordica charantia, Spinacia oleracea mouthwash against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Porphyromonas gingivalis. Conclusion: Momordica charantia extract mouthwash and Spinacia oleracea extract mouthwash can be used as an herbal alternative as it has equal antibacterial efficacy against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Porphyromonas gingivalis as compared to 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氯己定漱口水与苦瓜、菠菜漱口水对变形链球菌、乳酸杆菌和牙龈卟啉单胞菌抗菌效果的比较评价——一项体外研究
引言:药理学和合成有机化学取得了各种进展,对天然产物的依赖,特别是对草药的依赖,相对没有变化。在牙科使用的各种草药产品中,使用苦瓜提取物和菠菜提取物制备的漱口水预防儿童龋齿的功效尚未得到研究。因此,本研究评估了氯己定漱口水对变形链球菌和嗜酸乳杆菌、牙龈卟啉单胞菌的抗菌效果,并与苦瓜、菠菜漱口水进行了比较。评价和比较氯己定漱口水与苦瓜、菠菜漱口水对变形链球菌、嗜酸乳杆菌和牙龈卟啉单胞菌的抗菌效果。材料与方法:制备苦瓜和菠菜乙醇提取物。然后使用雷萨祖林法和琼脂平板划线法测定这些提取物对变形链球菌、嗜酸乳杆菌和牙龈卟啉单胞菌的最小抑菌浓度(MIC)和最小杀菌浓度(MBC)。然后用MIC和MBC值从提取物中制备草药漱口水,并用MTT法测定其细胞毒性。然后用琼脂扩散法和时间杀伤法测定抗菌药物的敏感性。结果:洗必泰漱口水与苦瓜、菠菜漱口水对变形链球菌、嗜酸乳杆菌和牙龈卟啉单胞菌的疗效无统计学差异。结论:苦瓜提取物漱口水和菠菜提取物漱口水对变形链球菌、嗜酸乳杆菌、牙龈卟啉单胞菌的抗菌效果与0.2%氯己定漱口水相当,可作为草药替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orofacial Sciences
Journal of Orofacial Sciences Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orofacial Sciences is dedicated to noblest profession of Dentistry, and to the young & blossoming intellects of dentistry, with whom the future of dentistry will be cherished better. The prime aim of this journal is to advance the science and art of dentistry. This journal is an educational tool to encourage and share the acquired knowledge with our peers. It also to improves the standards and quality of therauptic methods. This journal assures you to gain knowledge in recent advances and research activities. The journal publishes original scientific papers with special emphasis on research, unusual case reports, editorial, review articles, book reviews & other relevant information in context of high professional standards.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Bromelain, A Pineapple Extract as a Bleaching Agent on Human Enamel and Determining its Concentration by Reverse-HPLC Method Comparative evaluation of antibacterial efficacy of chlorhexidine mouthwash and Momordica charantia, Spinacia oleracea mouthwash against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus spp., and Porphyromonas gingivalis − An in vitro study Identification of heterochromatic variations in nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate Effect of light-curing silver diamine fluoride on microtensile bond strength of primary carious dentin restored with glass ionomer cement: In vitro study Conference Proceedings 6th Malaysian International Dental show
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1