Understanding functional illiteracy from a policy, adult education, and cognition point of view: Towards a joint referent framework

IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Zeitschrift Fur Neuropsychologie Pub Date : 2019-05-29 DOI:10.1024/1016-264X/A000255
Aleksandar Bulajić, M. Despotović, T. Lachmann
{"title":"Understanding functional illiteracy from a policy, adult education, and cognition point of view: Towards a joint referent framework","authors":"Aleksandar Bulajić, M. Despotović, T. Lachmann","doi":"10.1024/1016-264X/A000255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The article discusses the emergence of a functional literacy construct and the rediscovery of illiteracy in industrialized countries during the second half of the 20th century. It offers a short explanation of how the construct evolved over time. In addition, it explores how functional (il)literacy is conceived differently by research discourses of cognitive and neural studies, on the one hand, and by prescriptive and normative international policy documents and adult education, on the other hand. Furthermore, it analyses how literacy skills surveys such as the Level One Study (leo.) or the PIAAC may help to bridge the gap between cognitive and more practical and educational approaches to literacy, the goal being to place the functional illiteracy (FI) construct within its existing scale levels. It also sheds more light on the way in which FI can be perceived in terms of different cognitive processes and underlying components of reading. By building on the previous work of other authors and previous definitions, the article brings together different views of FI and offers a perspective for a needed operational definition of the concept, which would be an appropriate reference point for future educational, political, and scientific utilization.","PeriodicalId":49343,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Neuropsychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Neuropsychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1016-264X/A000255","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract. The article discusses the emergence of a functional literacy construct and the rediscovery of illiteracy in industrialized countries during the second half of the 20th century. It offers a short explanation of how the construct evolved over time. In addition, it explores how functional (il)literacy is conceived differently by research discourses of cognitive and neural studies, on the one hand, and by prescriptive and normative international policy documents and adult education, on the other hand. Furthermore, it analyses how literacy skills surveys such as the Level One Study (leo.) or the PIAAC may help to bridge the gap between cognitive and more practical and educational approaches to literacy, the goal being to place the functional illiteracy (FI) construct within its existing scale levels. It also sheds more light on the way in which FI can be perceived in terms of different cognitive processes and underlying components of reading. By building on the previous work of other authors and previous definitions, the article brings together different views of FI and offers a perspective for a needed operational definition of the concept, which would be an appropriate reference point for future educational, political, and scientific utilization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从政策、成人教育和认知的角度理解功能性文盲:走向一个共同的参考框架
摘要本文讨论了20世纪下半叶工业化国家功能性扫盲结构的出现和文盲现象的重新发现。它提供了一个简短的解释,说明结构是如何随着时间的推移而演变的。此外,它还探讨了认知和神经研究的研究话语,以及规范性和规范性的国际政策文件和成人教育对功能性识字的不同看法。此外,它还分析了识字技能调查(如一级研究或PIAAC)如何有助于弥合认知方法与更实用和更教育的识字方法之间的差距,目标是将功能性文盲(FI)结构置于其现有的量表水平内。它还揭示了从不同的认知过程和阅读的基本组成部分来感知FI的方式。在其他作者先前工作和先前定义的基础上,本文汇集了对FI的不同观点,并为该概念的必要操作定义提供了一个视角,这将是未来教育、政治和科学利用的适当参考点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift Fur Neuropsychologie
Zeitschrift Fur Neuropsychologie CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: In der Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie werden aktuelle Forschungsergebnisse sowie Reviewartikel aus dem Bereich der experimentellen und klinischen Neuropsychologie sowie angrenzender Gebiete (z.B. Biologische Psychologie, Neurologie, Neuropsychiatrie, Neuropsychopharmakologie, Rehabilitationspsychologie) publiziert. Die Beiträge sollen gleichgewichtet sowohl die human- und tierexperimentelle Grundlagenforschung, als auch die klinische Forschung und die klinische Praxis berücksichtigen. Der klinische Schwerpunkt liegt auf der Diagnostik und Rehabilitation von kognitiven und affektiven Störungen, wie z.B. von Aufmerksamkeit, Gedächtnis, Planen und Problemlösen, Sensomotorik, Wahrnehmung, Emotionalität und Sozialverhalten.
期刊最新文献
Konstrukt- und Kriteriumsvalidität der neuropsychologischen Testbatterien TAP und KiTAP bei Kindern im Grundschulalter Kurzfassung der S2k-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie von Neglect und anderen Störungen der Raumkognition“ (AWMF-030/126) Effekte transkranieller Wechselstromstimulation auf das Putten bei fortgeschrittenen Golfern „Neuropsychology for You“ Rezension
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1