A constructivist approach to teach neuroanatomy lab: Students’ perceptions of an active learning environment

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Scottish Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-06-12 DOI:10.1177/00369330221107101
Sherif S. Hassan, Fauzia Nausheen, Frank Scali, Hina Mohsin, Charity Thomann
{"title":"A constructivist approach to teach neuroanatomy lab: Students’ perceptions of an active learning environment","authors":"Sherif S. Hassan, Fauzia Nausheen, Frank Scali, Hina Mohsin, Charity Thomann","doi":"10.1177/00369330221107101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background A recent trend in medical education is developing a more dynamic and integrated curriculum. Team-based learning (TBL) increases students’ engagement and the active construction of anatomical knowledge. This initial study aimed to empirically observe medical students’ perceptions of their achievement of learning outcomes and the construction of their neuroanatomy knowledge, critical thinking, and problem-solving using an interactive whiteboard (IWB) as a teaching strategy. Methods An independent neuroanatomy lab survey collected students’ perceptions and comments about their learning experiences using the IWB on a questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale. Results Student participants felt that using the IWB has facilitated their learning experience. 94.2% of student participants endorsed feelings that new technology has helped them achieve their learning outcomes, helped them integrate both their basic science and clinical science/skills knowledge (90.4%), enhanced their problem-solving skills (92.3%), facilitated their interaction with the neuroanatomy faculty (96.2%) and increase their critical thinking (88.4%). Conclusion Collecting such empirical data about students’ perceptions and their learning environment should help neurosciences faculty in medical schools better outline their activities to faculty at other medical institutions. Applying these methods may enhance the learning process, save time during neuroanatomy lab, and it could also help overcome the shortage of qualified neuroanatomy educators.","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":"67 1","pages":"80 - 86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330221107101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background A recent trend in medical education is developing a more dynamic and integrated curriculum. Team-based learning (TBL) increases students’ engagement and the active construction of anatomical knowledge. This initial study aimed to empirically observe medical students’ perceptions of their achievement of learning outcomes and the construction of their neuroanatomy knowledge, critical thinking, and problem-solving using an interactive whiteboard (IWB) as a teaching strategy. Methods An independent neuroanatomy lab survey collected students’ perceptions and comments about their learning experiences using the IWB on a questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale. Results Student participants felt that using the IWB has facilitated their learning experience. 94.2% of student participants endorsed feelings that new technology has helped them achieve their learning outcomes, helped them integrate both their basic science and clinical science/skills knowledge (90.4%), enhanced their problem-solving skills (92.3%), facilitated their interaction with the neuroanatomy faculty (96.2%) and increase their critical thinking (88.4%). Conclusion Collecting such empirical data about students’ perceptions and their learning environment should help neurosciences faculty in medical schools better outline their activities to faculty at other medical institutions. Applying these methods may enhance the learning process, save time during neuroanatomy lab, and it could also help overcome the shortage of qualified neuroanatomy educators.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建构主义的神经解剖学实验教学方法:学生对积极学习环境的认知
医学教育最近的一个趋势是开发一个更有活力和更综合的课程。团队学习(TBL)提高了学生的参与度和解剖学知识的主动建构。本初步研究旨在实证观察医学生使用互动白板作为教学策略,对其学习成果的成就、神经解剖学知识的建构、批判性思维和问题解决的看法。方法通过独立的神经解剖学实验室调查,采用李克特5分制问卷,收集学生对IWB学习经验的看法和评价。结果学生认为使用IWB促进了他们的学习体验。94.2%的学生认为新技术帮助他们取得了学习成果,帮助他们整合了基础科学和临床科学/技能知识(90.4%),提高了他们解决问题的能力(92.3%),促进了他们与神经解剖学教师的互动(96.2%),提高了他们的批判性思维(88.4%)。结论收集这些关于学生认知和学习环境的实证数据,有助于医学院神经科学教师更好地向其他医疗机构的教师概述他们的活动。应用这些方法可以提高学习过程,节省神经解剖学实验的时间,也有助于克服合格的神经解剖学教育工作者短缺的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scottish Medical Journal
Scottish Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A unique international information source for the latest news and issues concerning the Scottish medical community. Contributions are drawn from Scotland and its medical institutions, through an array of international authors. In addition to original papers, Scottish Medical Journal publishes commissioned educational review articles, case reports, historical articles, and sponsoring society abstracts.This journal is a member of the Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
The state of robotic surgery in Spain: Results of a national survey on robotic surgery. Influence of core stabilization exercise on physical function and muscle thickness in patients with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Pancreatic insulinomas: Our 15-year surgical experience. Efficacy and outcomes of a highland prehospital trauma response team. Ribosome-binding protein-1 (RRBP1) expression in prostate carcinomas and its relationship with clinicopathological prognostic factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1