Saussure’s Cours and the Monosyllabic Myth: the perception of Chinese in early linguistic theory

IF 0.2 3区 文学 Q2 HISTORY Language & History Pub Date : 2022-07-21 DOI:10.1080/17597536.2022.2088002
Raúl Aranovich, Alan Wong
{"title":"Saussure’s Cours and the Monosyllabic Myth: the perception of Chinese in early linguistic theory","authors":"Raúl Aranovich, Alan Wong","doi":"10.1080/17597536.2022.2088002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Ferdinand de Saussure’s Cours de linguistique générale reproduced a misconception of Chinese as a monosyllabic language without complex words. In this paper, we investigate the sources of this misconception in Western thought. We also show that the misconception about Chinese was already known to be inaccurate in Saussure’s time, and that he had many missed opportunities to find out. While Saussure reproduced the empirical errors of Comparatists and Neogrammarians with respect to Chinese, he moved away from the cultural prejudices and attitudes that were behind their claims. This turn, we argue, illustrates an important aspect of the Saussurean scientific revolution, which was fuelled more by fundamental conceptual changes than by empirical discoveries.","PeriodicalId":41504,"journal":{"name":"Language & History","volume":"66 1","pages":"59 - 79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language & History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17597536.2022.2088002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Ferdinand de Saussure’s Cours de linguistique générale reproduced a misconception of Chinese as a monosyllabic language without complex words. In this paper, we investigate the sources of this misconception in Western thought. We also show that the misconception about Chinese was already known to be inaccurate in Saussure’s time, and that he had many missed opportunities to find out. While Saussure reproduced the empirical errors of Comparatists and Neogrammarians with respect to Chinese, he moved away from the cultural prejudices and attitudes that were behind their claims. This turn, we argue, illustrates an important aspect of the Saussurean scientific revolution, which was fuelled more by fundamental conceptual changes than by empirical discoveries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
索绪尔的Cours与单音节神话——早期语言学理论中的汉语认知
摘要:费迪南德·索绪尔的《语言学教程》再现了一种误解,认为汉语是一种没有复杂单词的单音节语言。在本文中,我们探究了西方思想中这种误解的根源。我们还表明,在索绪尔的时代,人们已经知道对汉语的误解是不准确的,他错过了很多发现的机会。索绪尔再现了比较学派和新语法学派在汉语方面的经验错误,但他摆脱了他们主张背后的文化偏见和态度。我们认为,这一转变说明了索绪尔科学革命的一个重要方面,它更多地是由基本的概念变化而非经验发现推动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Language & History
Language & History Multiple-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
William Dwight Whitney’s study of language acquisition in The Life and Growth of the Science of Language (1875): His entry point to his scientific method and theory of language and mind ‘Brief Conversations for Pilgrims’: Rasputin, Russian-speaking travellers and the pilgrim experience in Jerusalem in 1911–1912 The development of the concept of ʽevidentialityʼ and its exogenous application to European languages The curious case(s) of the Hebrew article: on a conflated grammatical category and how it emerges from sixteenth-century student notes Grammatical category versus comparative concept in missionary grammars of Tamil (16th-18th centuries): the description of the relative clause
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1