Lateral Buckling of an Elastic Pipe on a Frictional Seabed

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering-Transactions of the Asme Pub Date : 2023-01-11 DOI:10.1115/1.4056648
R. Peek
{"title":"Lateral Buckling of an Elastic Pipe on a Frictional Seabed","authors":"R. Peek","doi":"10.1115/1.4056648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Pipelines tend to buckle laterally under thermal expansion. In existing analytical solutions by Kerr and Hobbs, it is assumed that the seabed resistance q0 to lateral pipe movements is constant in magnitude, and opposite in direction to the total displacement. Here it is opposite to the velocity instead, i.e. the seabed is taken to be frictional rather than nonlinear elastic with a V-shaped potential function. A 3-lobe (“Mode 3f”) analytical solution is provided for the frictional case, using the same approximate end-of-buckle condition v=v'=v''=0 used by Hobbs in his “Mode 3” solution for the nonlinear elastic case. For both Mode 3 and 3f solutions, the shape of the buckle does not change as it grows with increasing thermal expansion, though the scaling factors in the axial and lateral directions are different, i.e. the solutions are self-similar. A single finite element solution for the frictional case with an initial imperfection imposed by a bumper can be scaled to cover all such cases. It shows that the shape of the buckle depends on the amplitude of the initial triggering imperfection, and is close to the Mode 3f solution for very small initial imperfections. The difference between Mode 3 and 3f is significant in regard to buckle shape and the relative size of the buckle lobes, but small in regard to the maximum bending moment for a given amount of thermal expansion accommodated by the buckle.","PeriodicalId":50106,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056648","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pipelines tend to buckle laterally under thermal expansion. In existing analytical solutions by Kerr and Hobbs, it is assumed that the seabed resistance q0 to lateral pipe movements is constant in magnitude, and opposite in direction to the total displacement. Here it is opposite to the velocity instead, i.e. the seabed is taken to be frictional rather than nonlinear elastic with a V-shaped potential function. A 3-lobe (“Mode 3f”) analytical solution is provided for the frictional case, using the same approximate end-of-buckle condition v=v'=v''=0 used by Hobbs in his “Mode 3” solution for the nonlinear elastic case. For both Mode 3 and 3f solutions, the shape of the buckle does not change as it grows with increasing thermal expansion, though the scaling factors in the axial and lateral directions are different, i.e. the solutions are self-similar. A single finite element solution for the frictional case with an initial imperfection imposed by a bumper can be scaled to cover all such cases. It shows that the shape of the buckle depends on the amplitude of the initial triggering imperfection, and is close to the Mode 3f solution for very small initial imperfections. The difference between Mode 3 and 3f is significant in regard to buckle shape and the relative size of the buckle lobes, but small in regard to the maximum bending moment for a given amount of thermal expansion accommodated by the buckle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摩擦海床上弹性管道的侧向屈曲
管道在热膨胀作用下往往会发生横向弯曲。在Kerr和Hobbs现有的分析解中,假设海底对管道横向运动的阻力q0在大小上是恒定的,并且在方向上与总位移相反。在这里,它与速度相反,即海床被认为是摩擦的,而不是具有V形势函数的非线性弹性。使用Hobbs在其非线性弹性情况的“模式3”解中使用的相同近似带扣末端条件v=v'=v''=0,为摩擦情况提供了一个3叶(“模式3f”)解析解。对于模式3和3f解决方案,带扣的形状不会随着热膨胀的增加而改变,尽管轴向和横向的比例因子不同,即解决方案是自相似的。具有保险杠施加的初始缺陷的摩擦情况的单个有限元解可以按比例缩放以覆盖所有此类情况。它表明,带扣的形状取决于初始触发缺陷的振幅,并且对于非常小的初始缺陷,它接近于模式3f的解。模式3和3f之间的差异在带扣形状和带扣凸起的相对尺寸方面是显著的,但在由带扣容纳的给定热膨胀量的最大弯曲力矩方面是小的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
63
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering is an international resource for original peer-reviewed research that advances the state of knowledge on all aspects of analysis, design, and technology development in ocean, offshore, arctic, and related fields. Its main goals are to provide a forum for timely and in-depth exchanges of scientific and technical information among researchers and engineers. It emphasizes fundamental research and development studies as well as review articles that offer either retrospective perspectives on well-established topics or exposures to innovative or novel developments. Case histories are not encouraged. The journal also documents significant developments in related fields and major accomplishments of renowned scientists by programming themed issues to record such events. Scope: Offshore Mechanics, Drilling Technology, Fixed and Floating Production Systems; Ocean Engineering, Hydrodynamics, and Ship Motions; Ocean Climate Statistics, Storms, Extremes, and Hurricanes; Structural Mechanics; Safety, Reliability, Risk Assessment, and Uncertainty Quantification; Riser Mechanics, Cable and Mooring Dynamics, Pipeline and Subsea Technology; Materials Engineering, Fatigue, Fracture, Welding Technology, Non-destructive Testing, Inspection Technologies, Corrosion Protection and Control; Fluid-structure Interaction, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Flow and Vortex-Induced Vibrations; Marine and Offshore Geotechnics, Soil Mechanics, Soil-pipeline Interaction; Ocean Renewable Energy; Ocean Space Utilization and Aquaculture Engineering; Petroleum Technology; Polar and Arctic Science and Technology, Ice Mechanics, Arctic Drilling and Exploration, Arctic Structures, Ice-structure and Ship Interaction, Permafrost Engineering, Arctic and Thermal Design.
期刊最新文献
PEridynamic Analysis of Tubular Joints of Offshore Jacket Structure Underwater impulsive response of sandwich structure with multilayer foam core Numerical Study on the Automatic Ballast Control of a Floating Dock Gravity wave interaction with a composite pile-rock breakwater Modelling Green Water Load on A Deck Mounted Circular Cylinder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1