Intersectionality and structural gendered racism: Theoretical considerations for Black women, children, and families impacted by child protective services in the United States

IF 2.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2022-10-11 DOI:10.1177/02610183221125322
Abigail Williams-Butler
{"title":"Intersectionality and structural gendered racism: Theoretical considerations for Black women, children, and families impacted by child protective services in the United States","authors":"Abigail Williams-Butler","doi":"10.1177/02610183221125322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This critical review uses the frameworks of intersectionality and structural gendered racism to understand the racialized, gendered, and class-based oppression regarding the overrepresentation of poor Black women, children, and families within child protective services (CPS) in the United States. The review begins with a discussion of intersectionality and examines the origins of CPS, along with the potential causes for overrepresentation within the system. Finally, the article presents a detailed overview of how structural gendered racism is manifested within CPS practices and policies. It is imperative that practitioners, administrators, and policymakers acknowledge the utility of applying the frameworks of intersectionality and structural gendered racism in understanding the disproportionate contact of poor Black women, children, and families within the system. It is important to work toward practice and policy interventions to improve the overall well-being of this population. Implications for social work practice and policy are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47685,"journal":{"name":"Critical Social Policy","volume":"43 1","pages":"514 - 535"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183221125322","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This critical review uses the frameworks of intersectionality and structural gendered racism to understand the racialized, gendered, and class-based oppression regarding the overrepresentation of poor Black women, children, and families within child protective services (CPS) in the United States. The review begins with a discussion of intersectionality and examines the origins of CPS, along with the potential causes for overrepresentation within the system. Finally, the article presents a detailed overview of how structural gendered racism is manifested within CPS practices and policies. It is imperative that practitioners, administrators, and policymakers acknowledge the utility of applying the frameworks of intersectionality and structural gendered racism in understanding the disproportionate contact of poor Black women, children, and families within the system. It is important to work toward practice and policy interventions to improve the overall well-being of this population. Implications for social work practice and policy are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交叉性和结构性性别种族主义:美国受儿童保护服务影响的黑人妇女、儿童和家庭的理论考虑
这篇批判性的综述使用交叉性和结构性性别种族主义的框架来理解关于美国儿童保护服务(CPS)中贫困黑人妇女、儿童和家庭的过度代表性的种族化、性别化和阶级化压迫。本文首先讨论了交叉性,并探讨了CPS的起源,以及该系统中代表性过高的潜在原因。最后,文章详细概述了结构性性别种族主义如何在CPS实践和政策中表现出来。从业者、管理者和政策制定者必须认识到,在理解贫困黑人妇女、儿童和家庭在体制内不成比例的接触时,应用交叉性和结构性性别种族主义框架的效用。重要的是要致力于实践和政策干预,以改善这一人口的整体福祉。讨论了对社会工作实践和政策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Critical Social Policy provides a forum for advocacy, analysis and debate on social policy issues. We publish critical perspectives which: ·acknowledge and reflect upon differences in political, economic, social and cultural power and upon the diversity of cultures and movements shaping social policy; ·re-think conventional approaches to securing rights, meeting needs and challenging inequalities and injustices; ·include perspectives, analyses and concerns of people and groups whose voices are unheard or underrepresented in policy-making; ·reflect lived experiences of users of existing benefits and services;
期刊最新文献
Distanciation as a technology of control in the UK hostile environment. Pregnant racialised migrants and the ubiquitous border: The hostile environment as a technology of stratified reproduction. Bordering social reproduction: The welfare/immigration regimes of Quebec and Ontario in Canada Diminishing returns of growth? Economic performance, needs satisfaction and ecological impacts of OECD welfare states A cure-all for energy poverty? Thinking critically about energy advice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1