A code-to-code comparison for dynamic modelling and response analysis of offshore wind turbine blade mating process

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering-Transactions of the Asme Pub Date : 2023-01-04 DOI:10.1115/1.4056617
Saravanan Bhaskaran, A. Verma, Shuai Yuan, Zhiyu Jiang, K. Halse
{"title":"A code-to-code comparison for dynamic modelling and response analysis of offshore wind turbine blade mating process","authors":"Saravanan Bhaskaran, A. Verma, Shuai Yuan, Zhiyu Jiang, K. Halse","doi":"10.1115/1.4056617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Offshore wind turbine blade installation using jack up crane vessel is a challenging task. Wave and wind induced loads on the installation system can cause large relative motion between the blade root and the hub during the mating process. Currently, several numerical tools are used to analyse such critical global motion responses; however, the industry suffers from lack of experiments and full-scale measurements to validate the accuracy of these results. Consequently, a code-to-code comparison exercise becomes critical as it allows comparing different numerical tools for reliable prediction and verification of results. In the present paper, a numerical model of the offshore wind turbine blade mating process using a jack-up crane vessel is developed in OrcaFlex, and a code-to-code comparison is performed against SIMA; both these tools are immensely used in the industry for modelling marine operations. Different comparisons are made between both the tools such as: (1) modal analyses of the jack-up vessel and the blade lifting gear, (2) time-domain analysis of the fully coupled installation vessel-crane-blade system, and (3) a comprehensive sensitivity study based on different seed numbers and simulation periods. The results of the study show a good agreement between both the tools with a deviation of less than 3% in terms of modal analysis and less than 5% variation in time domain results. Further, the paper provides modelling guidelines for the industry practitioners that heavily rely on both the tools for modelling marine operations.","PeriodicalId":50106,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Offshore wind turbine blade installation using jack up crane vessel is a challenging task. Wave and wind induced loads on the installation system can cause large relative motion between the blade root and the hub during the mating process. Currently, several numerical tools are used to analyse such critical global motion responses; however, the industry suffers from lack of experiments and full-scale measurements to validate the accuracy of these results. Consequently, a code-to-code comparison exercise becomes critical as it allows comparing different numerical tools for reliable prediction and verification of results. In the present paper, a numerical model of the offshore wind turbine blade mating process using a jack-up crane vessel is developed in OrcaFlex, and a code-to-code comparison is performed against SIMA; both these tools are immensely used in the industry for modelling marine operations. Different comparisons are made between both the tools such as: (1) modal analyses of the jack-up vessel and the blade lifting gear, (2) time-domain analysis of the fully coupled installation vessel-crane-blade system, and (3) a comprehensive sensitivity study based on different seed numbers and simulation periods. The results of the study show a good agreement between both the tools with a deviation of less than 3% in terms of modal analysis and less than 5% variation in time domain results. Further, the paper provides modelling guidelines for the industry practitioners that heavily rely on both the tools for modelling marine operations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海上风力涡轮机叶片匹配过程动态建模和响应分析的代码对代码比较
使用自升式起重船安装海上风力涡轮机叶片是一项具有挑战性的任务。在配合过程中,安装系统上的波浪和风引起的载荷会导致叶根和轮毂之间的较大相对运动。目前,有几种数值工具用于分析这种临界全局运动响应;然而,该行业缺乏实验和全尺寸测量来验证这些结果的准确性。因此,代码对代码的比较练习变得至关重要,因为它可以比较不同的数字工具,以可靠地预测和验证结果。本文在OrcaFlex中开发了一个使用自升式起重船的海上风机叶片匹配过程的数值模型,并与SIMA进行了代码对代码的比较;这两种工具在海洋作业建模行业中都得到了广泛应用。这两种工具之间进行了不同的比较,如:(1)自升式船舶和叶片起重装置的模态分析,(2)全耦合安装船吊叶片系统的时域分析,以及(3)基于不同种子数和模拟周期的综合灵敏度研究。研究结果表明,两种工具之间的一致性很好,模态分析的偏差小于3%,时域结果的变化小于5%。此外,该文件为严重依赖这两种工具进行海洋作业建模的行业从业者提供了建模指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
63
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering is an international resource for original peer-reviewed research that advances the state of knowledge on all aspects of analysis, design, and technology development in ocean, offshore, arctic, and related fields. Its main goals are to provide a forum for timely and in-depth exchanges of scientific and technical information among researchers and engineers. It emphasizes fundamental research and development studies as well as review articles that offer either retrospective perspectives on well-established topics or exposures to innovative or novel developments. Case histories are not encouraged. The journal also documents significant developments in related fields and major accomplishments of renowned scientists by programming themed issues to record such events. Scope: Offshore Mechanics, Drilling Technology, Fixed and Floating Production Systems; Ocean Engineering, Hydrodynamics, and Ship Motions; Ocean Climate Statistics, Storms, Extremes, and Hurricanes; Structural Mechanics; Safety, Reliability, Risk Assessment, and Uncertainty Quantification; Riser Mechanics, Cable and Mooring Dynamics, Pipeline and Subsea Technology; Materials Engineering, Fatigue, Fracture, Welding Technology, Non-destructive Testing, Inspection Technologies, Corrosion Protection and Control; Fluid-structure Interaction, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Flow and Vortex-Induced Vibrations; Marine and Offshore Geotechnics, Soil Mechanics, Soil-pipeline Interaction; Ocean Renewable Energy; Ocean Space Utilization and Aquaculture Engineering; Petroleum Technology; Polar and Arctic Science and Technology, Ice Mechanics, Arctic Drilling and Exploration, Arctic Structures, Ice-structure and Ship Interaction, Permafrost Engineering, Arctic and Thermal Design.
期刊最新文献
PEridynamic Analysis of Tubular Joints of Offshore Jacket Structure Underwater impulsive response of sandwich structure with multilayer foam core Numerical Study on the Automatic Ballast Control of a Floating Dock Gravity wave interaction with a composite pile-rock breakwater Modelling Green Water Load on A Deck Mounted Circular Cylinder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1