Mental Health Interventions in Juvenile Detention Institutions: A Systematic Review of What Works

IF 0.4 Q4 PEDIATRICS Adolescent Psychiatry Pub Date : 2021-11-16 DOI:10.2174/2210676611666211116163220
Kishwen Kanna Yoga Ratnam, Abid Nordin, P. S. K. Tok, Nik Daliana Nik Farid, M. Dahlui
{"title":"Mental Health Interventions in Juvenile Detention Institutions: A Systematic Review of What Works","authors":"Kishwen Kanna Yoga Ratnam, Abid Nordin, P. S. K. Tok, Nik Daliana Nik Farid, M. Dahlui","doi":"10.2174/2210676611666211116163220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nIncarcerated adolescents within the juvenile justice system are\nmore likely to be diagnosed with poor mental health compared with their non-incarcerated\npeers. Conducting clinical trials on mental health interventions among an incarcerated\nadolescent population is challenging due to the nature of detention facilities.\n\n\n\nThis systematic review examines available literature on Randomized Clinical\nTrials (RCT) done to assess mental health interventions among incarcerated adolescents\nglobally and to determine the type of intervention that would best work in this setting. In\nthis study, a systematic review was conducted to search, identify, and recommend effective\ninterventions best suited to preserve and improve the mental wellbeing of incarcerated\nadolescents within the detention institution setting.\n\n\n\nThe search was performed in Medline via Ovid, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and\nWeb of Science databases to retrieve related publications released between 1970 and March\n2021. The principal inclusion criteria were RCT articles issued in English that reported any\nmental health interventions performed in juvenile detention centers involving delinquent\nadolescents aged 10 to 19 years old.\n\n\n\n The search discovered 10 related articles that fulfilled the required inclusion\ncriteria. In total, there were seven different types of mental health interventions used in all\nthe studies. The three major themes identified among the selected studies are the\ninterventions for coping strategies, risky behavior, and attention disorder among\nincarcerated adolescents. The efficacy of the interventions was dependent on the level of\nintelligence, duration of incarceration, risk of treatment diffusion, and depression symptoms\namong incarcerated adolescents.\n\n\n\nCognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) intervention that is simple, brief, unique,\nand targets depressive symptoms, has the potential to be most efficacious in improving\nmental health among incarcerated adolescents.\n","PeriodicalId":43326,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2210676611666211116163220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Incarcerated adolescents within the juvenile justice system are more likely to be diagnosed with poor mental health compared with their non-incarcerated peers. Conducting clinical trials on mental health interventions among an incarcerated adolescent population is challenging due to the nature of detention facilities. This systematic review examines available literature on Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT) done to assess mental health interventions among incarcerated adolescents globally and to determine the type of intervention that would best work in this setting. In this study, a systematic review was conducted to search, identify, and recommend effective interventions best suited to preserve and improve the mental wellbeing of incarcerated adolescents within the detention institution setting. The search was performed in Medline via Ovid, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to retrieve related publications released between 1970 and March 2021. The principal inclusion criteria were RCT articles issued in English that reported any mental health interventions performed in juvenile detention centers involving delinquent adolescents aged 10 to 19 years old. The search discovered 10 related articles that fulfilled the required inclusion criteria. In total, there were seven different types of mental health interventions used in all the studies. The three major themes identified among the selected studies are the interventions for coping strategies, risky behavior, and attention disorder among incarcerated adolescents. The efficacy of the interventions was dependent on the level of intelligence, duration of incarceration, risk of treatment diffusion, and depression symptoms among incarcerated adolescents. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) intervention that is simple, brief, unique, and targets depressive symptoms, has the potential to be most efficacious in improving mental health among incarcerated adolescents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年拘留机构的心理健康干预:有效措施的系统回顾
与未被监禁的同龄人相比,在少年司法系统中被监禁的青少年更容易被诊断出精神健康状况不佳。由于拘留所的性质,在被监禁的青少年人群中进行心理健康干预的临床试验具有挑战性。本系统综述检查了随机临床试验(RCT)的现有文献,以评估全球被监禁青少年的心理健康干预措施,并确定在这种情况下最有效的干预类型。在这项研究中,进行了系统的回顾,以寻找、识别和推荐最适合保护和改善拘留机构环境中被监禁青少年心理健康的有效干预措施。在Medline中通过Ovid、Cochrane Library、Scopus和web of Science数据库进行检索,检索1970年至2021年3月之间发布的相关出版物。主要纳入标准是用英文发表的随机对照试验文章,这些文章报告了在少年拘留中心进行的涉及10至19岁犯罪青少年的任何心理健康干预措施。搜索发现了10篇符合要求的纳入标准的相关文章。总的来说,所有研究中使用了七种不同类型的心理健康干预措施。在选定的研究中确定的三个主要主题是对被监禁青少年的应对策略、危险行为和注意力障碍的干预。干预的效果取决于被监禁青少年的智力水平、监禁时间、治疗扩散的风险和抑郁症状。认知行为疗法(CBT)干预简单、简短、独特,针对抑郁症状,有可能最有效地改善被监禁青少年的心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Adolescent Psychiatry
Adolescent Psychiatry PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Adolescent Psychiatry a peer-reviewed journal, aims to provide mental health professionals who work with adolescents with current information relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric disorders in adolescents. Adolescent Psychiatry reports of original research, critical reviews of topics relevant to practitioners, clinical observations with analysis and discussion, analysis of philosophical, ethical or social aspects of the fields of psychiatry and mental health, case reports with discussions, letters, and position papers. Topics include adolescent development and developmental psychopathology, psychotherapy and other psychosocial treatment approaches, psychopharmacology, and service settings and programs. The primary focus of the work should be on adolescents, transition-aged youth, The primary focus of the work should be on adolescents, transition-aged youth, or emerging adults, that is, persons 12-24 years of age . Articles on families of adolescents, or adults who have been followed since adolescence will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
ADHD Symptoms Among Adolescents: Factor Structure Based on Mother and Adolescent Self-Ratings Social Media and Fear of Missing Out: An Exploration of the Role of Mindfulness, Cognitive Biases and Need to Belong in Chinese College Students A Brief Review of Flourishing Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Mood and Anxiety Disorders Impact of Changing Cannabis Laws on Cannabis Use Disorders, Serious Mental Illness, and Mortality Outcomes in US Youth: A Narrative Review Effects of Cannabidiol in Adolescent and Young Adult Depressive and Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Preclinical Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1