Interorganizational coworking: attenuating complexity, enhancing resilience and fostering open innovation and knowledge cocreation

IF 2.4 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Transforming Government- People Process and Policy Pub Date : 2022-02-15 DOI:10.1108/tg-07-2021-0117
Xhimi Hysa, Artemisa Themeli
{"title":"Interorganizational coworking: attenuating complexity, enhancing resilience and fostering open innovation and knowledge cocreation","authors":"Xhimi Hysa, Artemisa Themeli","doi":"10.1108/tg-07-2021-0117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to explore how interorganizational coworking spaces (CWS) affect complexity, resilience, open innovation and knowledge cocreation.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis is a qualitative study using the exploratory design. Data are gathered through semistructured interviews and naturalistic observation in six different CWS.\n\n\nFindings\nIn line with previous studies, the findings show that being in a CWS with professionals of various backgrounds and contained levels of diversity make people prone to communication and knowledge sharing. Differently from previous research about knowledge creation in CWS, this study discovered that knowledge cocreation was only averagely affected. Complexity and resilience were the most influenced dimensions with scores higher than average, followed by open innovation and knowledge cocreation.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nMain limitations are related to the qualitative method itself which may not reach the data saturation and with the nonsynergistic analysis of all dimensions together. A further limitation arose because of the COVID-19 pandemic which contributed to downsizing the number of participants while restricting the options of the involved research instruments. The implications for research are related to a need for further studies using large-scale surveys to strengthen the reliability of research. Additionally, more research is needed to explore the multiple dimensions of open innovation, complexity and resilience in CWS.\n\n\nPractical implications\nFor CWS providers, it is recommended to create thematic/clustered areas of collaboration based on specific professions. For early-stage businesses, freelancers and micro/entrepreneurial firms that do not wish to lease their own office, CWS provide an opportunity for value cocreation and open innovation.\n\n\nSocial implications\nCWS, either physical or virtual, can be used as a retreat approach and a socialization platform, especially for those in need to recover from post-traumatic stress due to the imposed isolation caused by COVID-19 pandemic.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nGiven the unexplored phenomena of complexity and resilience in CWS, the major contribution of this research is related to the impact of interorganizational coworking upon complexity and resilience.\n","PeriodicalId":51696,"journal":{"name":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-07-2021-0117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore how interorganizational coworking spaces (CWS) affect complexity, resilience, open innovation and knowledge cocreation. Design/methodology/approach This is a qualitative study using the exploratory design. Data are gathered through semistructured interviews and naturalistic observation in six different CWS. Findings In line with previous studies, the findings show that being in a CWS with professionals of various backgrounds and contained levels of diversity make people prone to communication and knowledge sharing. Differently from previous research about knowledge creation in CWS, this study discovered that knowledge cocreation was only averagely affected. Complexity and resilience were the most influenced dimensions with scores higher than average, followed by open innovation and knowledge cocreation. Research limitations/implications Main limitations are related to the qualitative method itself which may not reach the data saturation and with the nonsynergistic analysis of all dimensions together. A further limitation arose because of the COVID-19 pandemic which contributed to downsizing the number of participants while restricting the options of the involved research instruments. The implications for research are related to a need for further studies using large-scale surveys to strengthen the reliability of research. Additionally, more research is needed to explore the multiple dimensions of open innovation, complexity and resilience in CWS. Practical implications For CWS providers, it is recommended to create thematic/clustered areas of collaboration based on specific professions. For early-stage businesses, freelancers and micro/entrepreneurial firms that do not wish to lease their own office, CWS provide an opportunity for value cocreation and open innovation. Social implications CWS, either physical or virtual, can be used as a retreat approach and a socialization platform, especially for those in need to recover from post-traumatic stress due to the imposed isolation caused by COVID-19 pandemic. Originality/value Given the unexplored phenomena of complexity and resilience in CWS, the major contribution of this research is related to the impact of interorganizational coworking upon complexity and resilience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织间协同工作:降低复杂性,增强弹性,促进开放式创新和知识共同创造
目的本研究旨在探讨组织间共同工作空间(CWS)如何影响复杂性、弹性、开放创新和知识共同创造。设计/方法论/方法这是一项使用探索性设计的定性研究。数据是通过半结构化访谈和对六种不同CWS的自然主义观察收集的。研究结果与之前的研究一致,研究结果表明,在CWS中,有各种背景和多样性水平的专业人员,人们容易进行交流和知识共享。与以往关于CWS中知识创造的研究不同,本研究发现,知识创造只受到平均影响。复杂性和韧性是受影响最大的维度,得分高于平均水平,其次是开放创新和知识共创。研究局限性/含义主要局限性与定性方法本身有关,定性方法本身可能无法达到数据饱和,并且与所有维度的非齐次分析有关。新冠肺炎大流行导致了进一步的限制,这导致参与者人数减少,同时限制了相关研究工具的选择。对研究的影响与进一步研究的必要性有关,需要使用大规模调查来加强研究的可靠性。此外,还需要更多的研究来探索CWS中开放创新、复杂性和弹性的多个维度。实践意义对于CWS提供商,建议基于特定专业创建主题/集群合作领域。对于不想租赁自己办公室的早期企业、自由职业者和微型/创业公司,CWS提供了一个价值共创和开放创新的机会。社交暗示CWS,无论是物理的还是虚拟的,都可以作为一种务虚的方法和社交平台,特别是对于那些因新冠肺炎大流行造成的强制隔离而需要从创伤后压力中恢复的人。独创性/价值鉴于CWS中尚未探索的复杂性和弹性现象,本研究的主要贡献与组织间合作对复杂性和弹性的影响有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Flawed charts in pension fund popular reports Public trust and collaborative e-governance performance: a study on government institutions and services Automation in public sector jobs and services: a framework to analyze public digital transformation’s impact in a data-constrained environment Digital inclusion for all? A gender-disaggregated analysis of e-government service use in Indonesia Measuring the effects of electronic government services and corrupt practices on information exchange: a comparison of public and private hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1