The Relationship of the Natural and the Social in Intragroup and Intergroup Relations in a Situation of Interethnic Conflicts

Subbotina Nadezhda D.
{"title":"The Relationship of the Natural and the Social in Intragroup and Intergroup Relations in a Situation of Interethnic Conflicts","authors":"Subbotina Nadezhda D.","doi":"10.21209/1996-7853-2021-16-5-87-98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of interethnic conflicts is currently one of the topics attracting the attention of researchers of various specialties – culturologists, anthropologists, historians, social psychologists and others. The purpose and main task of this study is to analyze from a philosophical point of view the dialectics of the natural and the social in ethnic relations and its manifestation in interethnic conflicts. Accordingly, the article uses dialectical and comparative approaches. The theoretical basis of the study is the author’s concept of the relationship between natural and social in society and a man, which made it possible to identify the structure of ethnic relations according to this criterion, to determine the differences between social-group and natural-group relations. Intragroup and intergroup relations, in which natural components prevail over social ones are designated by the concept of “natural-group relations” (NGR) introduced in the author’s methodology. The specific results of the research and the novelty are the discovery of the specificity of the manifestation of the patterns of natural group relations and the role of suggestion in interethnic conflicts. It is proved that the concept of “group centrism” is not enough for the analysis of groups, since it describes mainly the assessment of one’s group and its values, and the concept of “regularities of natural group relations” denotes the hierarchical structure of a group, mechanisms of forced identification (including by methods of education) and self-identification, intragroup and intergroup relationships, reasons for conformism, etc. The article proves that the symptoms of grouping thinking, which were identified by I. L. Janis in small closed groups, and which are a kind of (NGR) patterns, are manifested with some variations in large groups. It is concluded that authors studying group relations do not pay enough attention to the natural prerequisites for the formation of groups and grouping of thinking, the fact that, due to the need for survival, the desire to unite into groups, to form and protect the uniformity of thinking is inherent in our genetic programs and is supported by suggestion. he further part of the article is devoted to the analysis of two interethnic conflicts based on the developed methodology ‒ the Arab-Israeli and Uzbek-Kyrgyz and the forecast, as well as the possibility of overcoming them.","PeriodicalId":33580,"journal":{"name":"Gumanitarnyi vektor","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gumanitarnyi vektor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21209/1996-7853-2021-16-5-87-98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The problem of interethnic conflicts is currently one of the topics attracting the attention of researchers of various specialties – culturologists, anthropologists, historians, social psychologists and others. The purpose and main task of this study is to analyze from a philosophical point of view the dialectics of the natural and the social in ethnic relations and its manifestation in interethnic conflicts. Accordingly, the article uses dialectical and comparative approaches. The theoretical basis of the study is the author’s concept of the relationship between natural and social in society and a man, which made it possible to identify the structure of ethnic relations according to this criterion, to determine the differences between social-group and natural-group relations. Intragroup and intergroup relations, in which natural components prevail over social ones are designated by the concept of “natural-group relations” (NGR) introduced in the author’s methodology. The specific results of the research and the novelty are the discovery of the specificity of the manifestation of the patterns of natural group relations and the role of suggestion in interethnic conflicts. It is proved that the concept of “group centrism” is not enough for the analysis of groups, since it describes mainly the assessment of one’s group and its values, and the concept of “regularities of natural group relations” denotes the hierarchical structure of a group, mechanisms of forced identification (including by methods of education) and self-identification, intragroup and intergroup relationships, reasons for conformism, etc. The article proves that the symptoms of grouping thinking, which were identified by I. L. Janis in small closed groups, and which are a kind of (NGR) patterns, are manifested with some variations in large groups. It is concluded that authors studying group relations do not pay enough attention to the natural prerequisites for the formation of groups and grouping of thinking, the fact that, due to the need for survival, the desire to unite into groups, to form and protect the uniformity of thinking is inherent in our genetic programs and is supported by suggestion. he further part of the article is devoted to the analysis of two interethnic conflicts based on the developed methodology ‒ the Arab-Israeli and Uzbek-Kyrgyz and the forecast, as well as the possibility of overcoming them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
族群冲突背景下的族群内部与族群间关系中的自然与社会关系
种族间冲突问题目前是吸引各专业研究人员——文化学家、人类学家、历史学家、社会心理学家和其他人——注意的话题之一。本研究的目的和主要任务是从哲学的角度分析民族关系中的自然辩证法和社会辩证法及其在民族间冲突中的表现。因此,本文运用了辩证法和比较法。本研究的理论基础是作者对社会和人的自然与社会关系的概念,这使得根据这一标准来识别种族关系的结构,从而确定社会群体关系和自然群体关系之间的差异成为可能。在作者的方法论中引入的“自然群体关系”(NGR)概念指定了群体内和群体间关系,其中自然成分优先于社会成分。研究的具体结果和新颖之处在于发现了自然群体关系模式表现的特殊性以及暗示在种族间冲突中的作用。事实证明,“群体中心主义”的概念不足以分析群体,因为它主要描述对一个人的群体及其价值观的评估,而“自然群体关系的规律”的概念表示群体的等级结构、强迫认同(包括通过教育方法)和自我认同的机制,群体内和群体间的关系,因循守旧的原因等。本文证明了I.L.Janis在封闭的小群体中发现的群体思维症状,是一种(NGR)模式,在大群体中表现为一些变异。结论是,研究群体关系的作者没有足够关注群体形成和思维分组的自然前提,事实上,由于生存的需要,团结成群体、形成和保护思维统一性的愿望是我们基因程序中固有的,并得到了建议的支持。文章的下一部分致力于基于已开发的方法分析两种种族间冲突——阿拉伯-以色列和乌兹别克-吉尔吉斯斯坦冲突和预测,以及克服它们的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Heuristic Potential of Methodological Approaches to the Study of “Nature – Society” System Problem of Personal Data Security and the Phenomenon of Post-Privacy in the Digital Society Digital Culture and Value Clash on TikTok: ‘Dancing Girl’ vs. Radical Feminist Traditional Values of Russian Society in the Digital Age Subjects of the “Knowledge Model of the Quality of Life” in the Concepts of Post-Industrialism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1