Motivating or stigmatising? The public health and media messaging surrounding COVID-19 and obesity: a qualitative think aloud study

IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Education Pub Date : 2021-10-25 DOI:10.1108/he-04-2021-0067
Sarah-Jane F. Stewart, J. Ogden
{"title":"Motivating or stigmatising? The public health and media messaging surrounding COVID-19 and obesity: a qualitative think aloud study","authors":"Sarah-Jane F. Stewart, J. Ogden","doi":"10.1108/he-04-2021-0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this study is to explore how individuals with overweight and obesity living in the UK respond to the public health and media messaging surrounding COVID-19 and obesity.Design/methodology/approachQualitative interview study with a think aloud protocol. A total of 10 participants self-reported to have overweight, obesity or as actively trying to lose weight were recruited through social media and were asked to think aloud whilst exposed to four sets of public health and media materials describing the link between COVID-19 and obesity. Interviews were conducted over zoom, recorded and transcribed verbatim.FindingsThree primary themes were identified through thematic analysis: “flawed messaging”, “COVID-19 as a teachable moment” and “barriers to change”. Transcending these themes was the notion of balance. Whilst the messaging around COVID-19 and obesity was deemed problematic; for some, it was a teachable moment to facilitate change when their future self and physical health was prioritised. Yet, when focussing on their mental health in the present participants felt more overwhelmed by the barriers and were less likely to take the opportunity to change.Practical implicationsFindings hold implications for public health messaging, highlighting the need for balance between being educational and informative but also supportive, so as to achieve maximum efficacy.Originality/valueThis study offers a novel and useful insight into how the public health and media messaging concerning COVID-19 risk and obesity is perceived by those with overweight and obesity.","PeriodicalId":47067,"journal":{"name":"Health Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/he-04-2021-0067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to explore how individuals with overweight and obesity living in the UK respond to the public health and media messaging surrounding COVID-19 and obesity.Design/methodology/approachQualitative interview study with a think aloud protocol. A total of 10 participants self-reported to have overweight, obesity or as actively trying to lose weight were recruited through social media and were asked to think aloud whilst exposed to four sets of public health and media materials describing the link between COVID-19 and obesity. Interviews were conducted over zoom, recorded and transcribed verbatim.FindingsThree primary themes were identified through thematic analysis: “flawed messaging”, “COVID-19 as a teachable moment” and “barriers to change”. Transcending these themes was the notion of balance. Whilst the messaging around COVID-19 and obesity was deemed problematic; for some, it was a teachable moment to facilitate change when their future self and physical health was prioritised. Yet, when focussing on their mental health in the present participants felt more overwhelmed by the barriers and were less likely to take the opportunity to change.Practical implicationsFindings hold implications for public health messaging, highlighting the need for balance between being educational and informative but also supportive, so as to achieve maximum efficacy.Originality/valueThis study offers a novel and useful insight into how the public health and media messaging concerning COVID-19 risk and obesity is perceived by those with overweight and obesity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激励还是侮辱?围绕COVID-19和肥胖的公共卫生和媒体信息:一项定性的有声思考研究
本研究的目的是探讨生活在英国的超重和肥胖个体如何应对围绕COVID-19和肥胖的公共卫生和媒体信息。设计/方法/方法采用出声思考协议的定性访谈研究。研究人员通过社交媒体招募了10名自我报告超重、肥胖或正在积极减肥的参与者,要求他们在阅读四套描述COVID-19与肥胖之间联系的公共卫生和媒体材料的同时大声思考。采访是通过视频进行的,逐字记录和转录。通过专题分析,确定了三个主要主题:“有缺陷的信息传递”、“COVID-19是一个可教育的时刻”和“变革的障碍”。超越这些主题的是平衡的概念。虽然围绕COVID-19和肥胖的信息被认为是有问题的;对一些人来说,当他们未来的自我和身体健康被优先考虑时,这是一个促进改变的教育时刻。然而,当关注他们目前的心理健康时,参与者更容易被障碍所压倒,不太可能抓住机会改变。实际影响研究结果对公共卫生信息传递具有影响,强调需要在教育性和信息性之间取得平衡,同时也要提供支持,以实现最大功效。独创性/价值这项研究为超重和肥胖人群如何感知有关COVID-19风险和肥胖的公共卫生和媒体信息提供了新颖而有用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Education
Health Education PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The range of topics covered is necessarily extremely wide. Recent examples include: ■Sex and sexuality ■Mental health ■Occupational health education ■Health communication ■The arts and health ■Personal change ■Healthy eating ■User involvement ■Drug and tobacco education ■Ethical issues in health education ■Developing the evidence base
期刊最新文献
Health literacy and subjective well-being amongst university students: moderating role of gender Psychological impact of COVID-19 on university students in Oman: an examination of stress, resilience and meaning in life ІСТОРИЧНИЙ ПОСТУП РОЗВИТКУ ТА ТРАНСФОРМАЦІЇ МЕДСЕСТРИНСЬКОЇ ОСВІТИ В УКРАЇНІ ТА СВІТІ ОБҐРУНТУВАННЯ НАПРЯМІВ ПІДВИЩЕННЯ ЕФЕКТИВНОСТІ ФАРМАЦЕВТИЧНОГО ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ ХВОРИХ НА ФЕНІЛКЕТОНУРІЮ ОСОБЛИВОСТІ ДІЯЛЬНОСТІ АПТЕК У ВОЄННИЙ ЧАС НА ПРИКЛАДІ ЛОКАЛЬНИХ МЕРЕЖ РІВНЕНСЬКОЇ ОБЛАСТІ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1