THE ASSESSMENT OF PATIENTS WITH NON-EROSIVE GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE BY USING THE BRAVO® PH MONITORING SYSTEM

Sanamed Pub Date : 2022-09-12 DOI:10.5937/sanamed17-39523
M. Gok, G. Gençdal
{"title":"THE ASSESSMENT OF PATIENTS WITH NON-EROSIVE GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE BY USING THE BRAVO® PH MONITORING SYSTEM","authors":"M. Gok, G. Gençdal","doi":"10.5937/sanamed17-39523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aim: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease in the world. GERD is always treated with drugs. The Bravo® wireless pH monitoring system is a good technique. The Bravo® may affect increasing the specificity and sensitivity in the diagnosis of GERD with its 48-hour recording feature.  In this study, we aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of the Bravo® pH monitoring system in patients with non-erosive GERD. \nMaterials and Methods: Patients with non-erosive reflux disease (normal endoscopy) whose symptoms persisted after PPI treatment (at least two months) were included in the study. All patients had upper gastrointestinal system endoscopies performed in our clinic between January 2013 and December 2019. All patients had a 48-hour Bravo® wireless pH monitoring record. \nResults: Twenty-three patients (M: 18 (78.3%; Age:35.7±11) were included in the study. All patients completed the 2-day recording protocol. During and after the procedure, no patient showed any adverse effects of the Bravo® procedure. We diagnosed GERD in 13 of 23 patients by Bravo® capsule. According to the Bravo® pH-meter recordings; Total time pH<4 (minute) was 187±190, the total number of refluxes was 90±61, the percentage of time with pH<4 was 7.1±7.22, the number of long reflux events were 8.1±8, the duration of the longest reflux episode during pH<4 (minute) was 31±49, the Demeester score was 20.8±19.3 detected. \nConclusion: Based on the results of the current study, the Bravo® pH monitoring system is a practical and effective diagnostic technique for non-erosive GERD. Further prospective studies would be useful for comparing the differences between 24-hour and 48-hour pH recording results.","PeriodicalId":53269,"journal":{"name":"Sanamed","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sanamed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/sanamed17-39523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease in the world. GERD is always treated with drugs. The Bravo® wireless pH monitoring system is a good technique. The Bravo® may affect increasing the specificity and sensitivity in the diagnosis of GERD with its 48-hour recording feature.  In this study, we aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of the Bravo® pH monitoring system in patients with non-erosive GERD. Materials and Methods: Patients with non-erosive reflux disease (normal endoscopy) whose symptoms persisted after PPI treatment (at least two months) were included in the study. All patients had upper gastrointestinal system endoscopies performed in our clinic between January 2013 and December 2019. All patients had a 48-hour Bravo® wireless pH monitoring record. Results: Twenty-three patients (M: 18 (78.3%; Age:35.7±11) were included in the study. All patients completed the 2-day recording protocol. During and after the procedure, no patient showed any adverse effects of the Bravo® procedure. We diagnosed GERD in 13 of 23 patients by Bravo® capsule. According to the Bravo® pH-meter recordings; Total time pH<4 (minute) was 187±190, the total number of refluxes was 90±61, the percentage of time with pH<4 was 7.1±7.22, the number of long reflux events were 8.1±8, the duration of the longest reflux episode during pH<4 (minute) was 31±49, the Demeester score was 20.8±19.3 detected. Conclusion: Based on the results of the current study, the Bravo® pH monitoring system is a practical and effective diagnostic technique for non-erosive GERD. Further prospective studies would be useful for comparing the differences between 24-hour and 48-hour pH recording results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BRAVO®PH监测系统对非胃食管反流病患者的评估
背景与目的:胃食管反流病(GERD)是世界上常见的疾病。GERD总是用药物治疗。Bravo®无线pH监测系统是一项很好的技术。Bravo®具有48小时记录功能,可能会影响GERD诊断的特异性和敏感性。在本研究中,我们旨在评估Bravo®pH监测系统对非侵蚀性胃食管反流病患者的诊断性能。材料和方法:PPI治疗后症状持续(至少两个月)的非糜烂性反流病(正常内窥镜检查)患者纳入研究。2013年1月至2019年12月,所有患者都在我们诊所进行了上消化道系统内镜检查。所有患者都有48小时Bravo®无线pH监测记录。结果:23例患者(男18例(78.3%),年龄35.7±11岁)被纳入研究。所有患者均完成了为期2天的记录方案。在手术过程中和手术后,没有患者表现出Bravo®手术的任何不良反应。我们通过Bravo®胶囊诊断了23名患者中的13名GERD。根据Bravo®pH计记录;pH<4(分钟)的总时间为187±190,回流总次数为90±61,pH<4的时间百分比为7.1±7.22,长回流事件次数为8.1±8,pH<3(分钟)期间最长回流事件的持续时间为31±49,检测到的Demester评分为20.8±19.3。结论:根据目前的研究结果,Bravo®pH监测系统是一种实用有效的非侵蚀性GERD诊断技术。进一步的前瞻性研究将有助于比较24小时和48小时pH记录结果之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Benefits of breastfeedinig for mother and child Physician burnout levels and associated factors in The Covid-19 pandemic Improvement of medical waste storage procedures Early detection of acute kidney injury in preterm newborns with perinatal asphyxia using serum cystatin Differences between biochemical, hematological, and coagulation parameters among patients with mild and severe COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1