Similarities and Differences in the Earth’s Water Variations Signal Provided by Grace and AMSR-E Observations Using Maximum Covariance Analysis at Various Land Cover Data Backgrounds

IF 0.7 Q4 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Artificial Satellites-Journal of Planetary Geodesy Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.2478/arsa-2023-0006
Viktor Szabo, K. Osińska-Skotak
{"title":"Similarities and Differences in the Earth’s Water Variations Signal Provided by Grace and AMSR-E Observations Using Maximum Covariance Analysis at Various Land Cover Data Backgrounds","authors":"Viktor Szabo, K. Osińska-Skotak","doi":"10.2478/arsa-2023-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The study presents a compatibility analysis of gravimetric observations with passive microwave observations. Monitoring the variability of soil water content is one of the essential issues in climate-related research. Total water storage changes (ΔTWS) observed by Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), enables the creation of many applications in hydrological monitoring. Soil moisture (SM) is a critical variable in hydrological studies. Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) satellite products provided unique observations on this variable in near-daily time resolutions. The study used maximum covariance analysis (MCA) to extract principal components for ΔTWS and SM signals. The analysis was carried out for the global area, dividing the discussion into individual continents. The amplitudes of gravimetric and microwave signals were computed via the complex empirical orthogonal function (EOF) and the complex conjugate EOF* to determine the regions for detailed comparison. Similarities and differences in signal convergence results were compared with land cover data describing soil conditions, vegetation cover, urbanization status, and cultivated land. Convergence was determined using Pearson correlation coefficients and cross-correlation. In order to compare ΔTWS and SM in individual seasons, ΔTWS observations were normalized. Results show that naturally forested areas and large open spaces used for agriculture support the compatibility between GRACE and AMSRE observations and are characterized by a good Pearson correlation coefficient >0.8. Subpolar regions with permafrost present constraints for AMSR-E observations and have little convergence with GRACE observations.","PeriodicalId":43216,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Satellites-Journal of Planetary Geodesy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Satellites-Journal of Planetary Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/arsa-2023-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The study presents a compatibility analysis of gravimetric observations with passive microwave observations. Monitoring the variability of soil water content is one of the essential issues in climate-related research. Total water storage changes (ΔTWS) observed by Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), enables the creation of many applications in hydrological monitoring. Soil moisture (SM) is a critical variable in hydrological studies. Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) satellite products provided unique observations on this variable in near-daily time resolutions. The study used maximum covariance analysis (MCA) to extract principal components for ΔTWS and SM signals. The analysis was carried out for the global area, dividing the discussion into individual continents. The amplitudes of gravimetric and microwave signals were computed via the complex empirical orthogonal function (EOF) and the complex conjugate EOF* to determine the regions for detailed comparison. Similarities and differences in signal convergence results were compared with land cover data describing soil conditions, vegetation cover, urbanization status, and cultivated land. Convergence was determined using Pearson correlation coefficients and cross-correlation. In order to compare ΔTWS and SM in individual seasons, ΔTWS observations were normalized. Results show that naturally forested areas and large open spaces used for agriculture support the compatibility between GRACE and AMSRE observations and are characterized by a good Pearson correlation coefficient >0.8. Subpolar regions with permafrost present constraints for AMSR-E observations and have little convergence with GRACE observations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Grace和AMSR-E观测提供的地球水分变化信号在不同土地覆盖数据背景下的异同
摘要:研究了重力观测与被动微波观测的相容性分析。土壤含水量的变化监测是气候相关研究的核心问题之一。通过重力恢复和气候实验(GRACE)观测到的总储水量变化(ΔTWS),可以在水文监测中创建许多应用程序。土壤湿度是水文研究中的一个重要变量。先进微波扫描辐射计(AMSR-E)卫星产品以接近日的时间分辨率提供了对这一变量的独特观测。本研究使用最大协方差分析(MCA)提取ΔTWS和SM信号的主成分。分析是针对全球地区进行的,将讨论划分为各个大陆。通过复经验正交函数(EOF)和复共轭EOF*计算重力和微波信号的振幅,以确定详细比较的区域。将信号收敛结果与描述土壤条件、植被覆盖、城市化状况和耕地的土地覆盖数据进行异同比较。收敛性采用Pearson相关系数和相互关系来确定。为了比较各个季节的ΔTWS和SM, ΔTWS观测值被归一化。结果表明,自然林区和大型农业用地支持GRACE和AMSRE观测结果的兼容性,Pearson相关系数为bb0 0.8。带永久冻土层的亚极地地区对AMSR-E观测存在限制,与GRACE观测的收敛性较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Similarities and Differences in the Earth’s Water Variations Signal Provided by Grace and AMSR-E Observations Using Maximum Covariance Analysis at Various Land Cover Data Backgrounds Medium- and Long-Term Prediction of Polar Motion Using Weighted Least Squares Extrapolation and Vector Autoregressive Modeling Study on Secular Change of the Earth’s Rotation Rate Based on Solar Eclipse Observation Records on October 13, 443 BC Interstellar Probe: Science, Engineering, Logistic, Economic, and Social Factors Geodynamic Studies in the Pieniny Klippen Belt in 2004–2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1