World(s) apart – Borges Coelho’s Museu da Revolução and Writing in (and of) a Changing World

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Gragoata-UFF Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI:10.22409/gragoata.v27i59.54292
Rui Gonçalves Miranda
{"title":"World(s) apart – Borges Coelho’s Museu da Revolução and Writing in (and of) a Changing World","authors":"Rui Gonçalves Miranda","doi":"10.22409/gragoata.v27i59.54292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article will depart from Said's position on the worldliness of texts and Pheng Cheah's reflections on postcolonial literature as world literature (2016) towards a reading of João Paulo Borges Coelho's 2021 novel Museu da Revolução. Borges Coelho's position on the articulation between history, politics, and literature (as literature; Rancière), as well as on the latter's aim of transforming the local place without losing sight of the universal, will provide insights into the ways in which the novel confronts the wordlessness of globalization. By staging a fictional democratization (Rancière), Museu da Revolução inscribes new ethico-political horizons as a \"text that strives to generate the context\", necessarily including those that have been forgotten from consensual (historical, political, memory) narratives. Lastly, the novel's positing of the transformative power of imagination will help flesh out the ways in which the \"poetico-literary performativity\" (Derrida) of texts can inscribe new ethico-political horizons and open up worlds (Cheah) when faced of the neoliberalist cancellation of the future (Berardi).","PeriodicalId":40605,"journal":{"name":"Gragoata-UFF","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gragoata-UFF","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22409/gragoata.v27i59.54292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article will depart from Said's position on the worldliness of texts and Pheng Cheah's reflections on postcolonial literature as world literature (2016) towards a reading of João Paulo Borges Coelho's 2021 novel Museu da Revolução. Borges Coelho's position on the articulation between history, politics, and literature (as literature; Rancière), as well as on the latter's aim of transforming the local place without losing sight of the universal, will provide insights into the ways in which the novel confronts the wordlessness of globalization. By staging a fictional democratization (Rancière), Museu da Revolução inscribes new ethico-political horizons as a "text that strives to generate the context", necessarily including those that have been forgotten from consensual (historical, political, memory) narratives. Lastly, the novel's positing of the transformative power of imagination will help flesh out the ways in which the "poetico-literary performativity" (Derrida) of texts can inscribe new ethico-political horizons and open up worlds (Cheah) when faced of the neoliberalist cancellation of the future (Berardi).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
世界(s)分开-博尔赫斯·科埃略的革命博物馆和写作在(和)一个变化的世界
本文将从赛义德对文本的世俗性的立场和谢锋对后殖民文学作为世界文学的反思(2016)出发,解读约翰·保罗·博尔赫斯·科埃略2021年的小说《革命博物馆 》。博尔赫斯·科埃略对历史、政治和文学(作为文学;ranci),以及后者在不忽视普遍的情况下改变地方的目标,将为小说面对全球化的沉默的方式提供见解。通过虚构的民主化(ranci re),革命博物馆将新的伦理政治视野作为“努力产生背景的文本”,必然包括那些被共识(历史、政治、记忆)叙述所遗忘的内容。最后,小说对想象力的变革力量的假设将有助于充实文本的“诗性文学表演”(德里达)在面对新自由主义对未来的取消(贝拉尔迪)时可以雕刻新的伦理政治视野和打开世界(谢赫)的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gragoata-UFF
Gragoata-UFF LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rethinking Rights and Inequalities in Language Studies A linguagem como zona do não-ser na vida de pessoas negras no sul global The indigenous critique and the divided brain hypothesis: Ideas to postpone the end of the World Aporias da desigualdade: o por vir das políticas afirmativas “Subjetividades-nada”, linguagem e aprendizagem: precisamos de atrapalhar as significâncias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1