The detriment that error production creates is affected by non-L1 speakers’ linguistic group membership

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Second Language Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-06 DOI:10.1075/jsls.00020.kir
Minna Kirjavainen, Grant Howie, Luke A. Rudge, Lucy Nicholson
{"title":"The detriment that error production creates is affected by non-L1 speakers’ linguistic group membership","authors":"Minna Kirjavainen, Grant Howie, Luke A. Rudge, Lucy Nicholson","doi":"10.1075/jsls.00020.kir","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We present three studies that investigate the effect of group-level language ability expectations on language\n ability judgements. Study 1 identifies expected English-language ability levels that native English speakers’ have for a number of\n non-native English-speaker groups. Based on the results, two text-based written-guise studies were conducted investigating the\n level of detriment that grammatical and lexical/typographical errors created on English-language ability ratings for different\n author guises (Swedish, Chinese, English) in formal (Study 2) and informal contexts (Study 3). In both contexts, grammatical\n errors produced by the guise representing the lower-ability non-L1 group were overlooked, while the same errors produced by the\n other guises significantly lowered the ability ratings. Our results coincide with the idea of the ‘sympathetic native speaker’ and\n expand it, suggesting that expected language level based on linguistic group membership inversely affects the level of\n sympathy/tolerance demonstrated. We link this to possible pedagogical implications.","PeriodicalId":29903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Second Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00020.kir","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present three studies that investigate the effect of group-level language ability expectations on language ability judgements. Study 1 identifies expected English-language ability levels that native English speakers’ have for a number of non-native English-speaker groups. Based on the results, two text-based written-guise studies were conducted investigating the level of detriment that grammatical and lexical/typographical errors created on English-language ability ratings for different author guises (Swedish, Chinese, English) in formal (Study 2) and informal contexts (Study 3). In both contexts, grammatical errors produced by the guise representing the lower-ability non-L1 group were overlooked, while the same errors produced by the other guises significantly lowered the ability ratings. Our results coincide with the idea of the ‘sympathetic native speaker’ and expand it, suggesting that expected language level based on linguistic group membership inversely affects the level of sympathy/tolerance demonstrated. We link this to possible pedagogical implications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
错误产生造成的损害受非母语使用者所属语言群体的影响
本文提出了三个研究,探讨群体水平语言能力期望对语言能力判断的影响。研究1确定了以英语为母语的人对一些非英语为母语的群体的预期英语能力水平。在此基础上,我们进行了两项基于文本的书面伪装研究,调查了语法和词汇/排版错误对正式(研究2)和非正式(研究3)中不同作者伪装(瑞典语、汉语、英语)的英语能力评级造成的损害程度。在这两种情况下,由伪装产生的语法错误都被忽略了,这些伪装代表了能力较低的非l1群体。而同样的错误由其他伪装产生显著降低能力评级。我们的研究结果与“富有同情心的母语人士”的观点一致,并将其扩展,表明基于语言群体成员的预期语言水平与所表现出的同情/宽容水平成反比。我们将此与可能的教学意义联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
The effects of frequency, duration, and intensity on L2 learning through Duolingo The detriment that error production creates is affected by non-L1 speakers’ linguistic group membership The neural correlates of second language syntax The relationships between individual differences in working memory and language analytical ability and the effectiveness of different types of corrective feedback How can we communicate (visually) what we (usually) mean by collocation and keyness?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1