Macroprudential Policy Versus Other Economic Policies

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS Croatian Economic Survey Pub Date : 2021-12-15 DOI:10.15179/ces.23.2.2
Eva Lorenčič, Mejra Festić
{"title":"Macroprudential Policy Versus Other Economic Policies","authors":"Eva Lorenčič, Mejra Festić","doi":"10.15179/ces.23.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the global financial crisis of 2007, macroprudential policy instruments have gained in recognition as a crucial tool for enhancing financial stability. Monetary policy, fiscal policy, and microprudential policy operate with a different toolkit and focus on achieving goals other than the stability of the financial system as a whole. In ligh of this, a fourth policy – namely macroprudential policy – is required to mitigate and prevent shocks that could destabilize the financial system as a whole and compromise financial stability. The aim of this paper is to contrast macroprudential policy with other economic policies and explain why other economic policies are unable to attain financial stability, which in turn justifies the need for a separate macroprudential policy, the ultimate goal whereof is precisely financial stability of the financial system as a whole. Our research results based on the descriptive research method indicate that, in order to prevent future financial crises, it is indispensable to combine both the microprudential and the macroprudential approach to financial stability. This is because the causes of the crises are often such that they cannot be prevented or mitigated by relying only on microprudential or only on macroprudential policy instruments.","PeriodicalId":42059,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Economic Survey","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Economic Survey","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15179/ces.23.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the global financial crisis of 2007, macroprudential policy instruments have gained in recognition as a crucial tool for enhancing financial stability. Monetary policy, fiscal policy, and microprudential policy operate with a different toolkit and focus on achieving goals other than the stability of the financial system as a whole. In ligh of this, a fourth policy – namely macroprudential policy – is required to mitigate and prevent shocks that could destabilize the financial system as a whole and compromise financial stability. The aim of this paper is to contrast macroprudential policy with other economic policies and explain why other economic policies are unable to attain financial stability, which in turn justifies the need for a separate macroprudential policy, the ultimate goal whereof is precisely financial stability of the financial system as a whole. Our research results based on the descriptive research method indicate that, in order to prevent future financial crises, it is indispensable to combine both the microprudential and the macroprudential approach to financial stability. This is because the causes of the crises are often such that they cannot be prevented or mitigated by relying only on microprudential or only on macroprudential policy instruments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宏观审慎政策与其他经济政策之比较
2007年全球金融危机后,宏观审慎政策工具作为加强金融稳定的关键工具得到了认可。货币政策、财政政策和微观审慎政策以不同的工具运作,重点是实现金融体系整体稳定以外的目标。有鉴于此,需要第四项政策——即宏观审慎政策——来减轻和防止可能破坏整个金融体系稳定和损害金融稳定的冲击。本文的目的是将宏观审慎政策与其他经济政策进行对比,并解释为什么其他经济政策无法实现金融稳定,这反过来证明需要单独的宏观审慎政策,其最终目标正是金融体系作为一个整体的金融稳定。我们基于描述性研究方法的研究结果表明,为了防止未来的金融危机,必须将微观审慎和宏观审慎的方法结合起来进行金融稳定。这是因为危机的起因往往是这样的,不能仅仅依靠微观审慎或宏观审慎的政策工具来预防或减轻危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Croatian Economic Survey is a Diamond Open Access journal defined by the following characteristics: -Peer review: the article goes through the journal''s process of a double-blind peer review. -Public access: both the author and the public have immediate access to the final, published version of the article. -Funding model: both the author and the public pay no fee to the journal. The journal is financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Education of the Republic of Croatia. Croatian Economic Survey is an English-language, peer-reviewed scholarly journal published by the Institute of Economics, Zagreb in Croatia and financed by the Croatian Ministry of Science and Education. The journal aims to serve as a forum for academics and practitioners by publishing high-quality research papers on topics in all areas of economics. Special focus is given to post-socialist Europe. Comparative studies are especially encouraged, since these countries share a similar socio-economic background and comparative studies offer a valuable source of insight for policy formulation as well as a basis for competitive benchmarking. The journal welcomes empirical and policy-oriented papers relevant to a broader international audience. Contributions need not be limited solely to economics; submissions from other related disciplines are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Does Crude Oil Price, Financial Development, and Trade Openness Reflect on African Oil-Rich Countries’ Economic Growth? Export Complexity and Economic Growth: Empirical Analysis for Selected CEE Countries What Are the Short- to Medium-Term Effects of Extreme Weather on the Croatian Economy? Dynamic Effects of Economic Growth, Foreign Direct Investment, and Trade Openness on Environmental Quality: Evidence From Asian Economies Employment Intensity of Economic Growth in Southern Europe: Evidence from Multidimensional Panel Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1