Numerical Validation of an Analytical Seal Flutter Model

IF 1.1 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Journal of the Global Power and Propulsion Society Pub Date : 2020-09-09 DOI:10.33737/gpps20-tc-142
M. Greco, R. Corral
{"title":"Numerical Validation of an Analytical Seal Flutter Model","authors":"M. Greco, R. Corral","doi":"10.33737/gpps20-tc-142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An analytical model to describe the flutter onset of straight-through labyrinth seals has been numerically validated using a frequency domain linearized Navier-Stokes solver. A comprehensive set of simulations has been conducted to assess the stability criterion of the analytical model originally derived by Corral and Vega (2018), “Conceptual Flutter Analysis of Labyrinth Seals Using Analytical Models - Part I: Theoretical Support,” ASME J. Turbomach., 140 (12), pp. 121006. The accuracy of the model has been assessed by using a simplified geometry consisting of a two-fin straight-through labyrinth seal with identical gaps. The effective gaps and the kinetic energy carried over are retained and their effects on stability are evaluated. It turns out that is important to inform the model with the correct values of both parameters to allow a proper comparison with the numerical simulations. Moreover, the non-isentropic perturbations included in the formulations are observed in the simulations at relatively low frequencies whose characteristic time is of the same order as the discharge time of the seal. This effect is responsible for the bending of the stability limit in the 0th ND stability map obtained both in the model and the simulations. It turns out that the analytical model can predict accurately the stability of the seal in a wide range of pressure ratios, vibration mode-shapes, and frequencies provided that this is informed with the fluid dynamic gaps and the energy carried over to the downstream fin from a steady RANS simulation. The numerical calculations show for the first time that the model can be used to predict accurately not only the trends of the work-per-cycle of the seal but also quantitative results.","PeriodicalId":53002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Global Power and Propulsion Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Global Power and Propulsion Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33737/gpps20-tc-142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An analytical model to describe the flutter onset of straight-through labyrinth seals has been numerically validated using a frequency domain linearized Navier-Stokes solver. A comprehensive set of simulations has been conducted to assess the stability criterion of the analytical model originally derived by Corral and Vega (2018), “Conceptual Flutter Analysis of Labyrinth Seals Using Analytical Models - Part I: Theoretical Support,” ASME J. Turbomach., 140 (12), pp. 121006. The accuracy of the model has been assessed by using a simplified geometry consisting of a two-fin straight-through labyrinth seal with identical gaps. The effective gaps and the kinetic energy carried over are retained and their effects on stability are evaluated. It turns out that is important to inform the model with the correct values of both parameters to allow a proper comparison with the numerical simulations. Moreover, the non-isentropic perturbations included in the formulations are observed in the simulations at relatively low frequencies whose characteristic time is of the same order as the discharge time of the seal. This effect is responsible for the bending of the stability limit in the 0th ND stability map obtained both in the model and the simulations. It turns out that the analytical model can predict accurately the stability of the seal in a wide range of pressure ratios, vibration mode-shapes, and frequencies provided that this is informed with the fluid dynamic gaps and the energy carried over to the downstream fin from a steady RANS simulation. The numerical calculations show for the first time that the model can be used to predict accurately not only the trends of the work-per-cycle of the seal but also quantitative results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
密封颤振分析模型的数值验证
使用频域线性化Navier-Stokes解算器对描述直通迷宫式密封颤振开始的分析模型进行了数值验证。已经进行了一系列全面的模拟,以评估Corral和Vega(2018)最初推导的分析模型的稳定性标准,“使用分析模型的迷宫密封的概念颤振分析-第一部分:理论支持”,ASME J.Turbomach。,140(12),第121006页。该模型的精度已通过使用简化的几何结构进行评估,该几何结构由具有相同间隙的双翅片直通迷宫式密封组成。保留了有效间隙和动能,并评估了它们对稳定性的影响。事实证明,重要的是向模型提供两个参数的正确值,以便与数值模拟进行适当的比较。此外,在模拟中,在相对较低的频率下观察到配方中包括的非等熵扰动,其特征时间与密封件的放电时间具有相同的阶数。这种效应是在模型和模拟中获得的第0 ND稳定性图中稳定性极限弯曲的原因。事实证明,该分析模型可以准确预测密封在宽压力比、振动模式形状和频率范围内的稳定性,前提是这是由流体动力学间隙和从稳定RANS模拟传递到下游翅片的能量所决定的。数值计算首次表明,该模型不仅可以准确预测密封每个周期的工作趋势,还可以准确预测定量结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Global Power and Propulsion Society
Journal of the Global Power and Propulsion Society Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Thermodynamic performance study of simplified precooled engine cycle with coupling power output Direct multi-fidelity integration of 3D CFD models in a gas turbine with numerical zooming method A novel performance adaptation method for aero-engine matching over a wide operating range Swirling flow field reconstruction and cooling performance analysis based on experimental observations using physics-informed neural networks Flow physics during durge of an axial-centrifugal compressor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1