Productivity and efficiency of central government departments: a mixed-effect model applied to Dutch data in the period 2012-2019

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Public Sector Economics Pub Date : 2023-09-04 DOI:10.3326/pse.47.3.2
Jos L. T. Blank, Alex A. S. van Heezik, B. Blank
{"title":"Productivity and efficiency of central government departments: a mixed-effect model applied to Dutch data in the period 2012-2019","authors":"Jos L. T. Blank, Alex A. S. van Heezik, B. Blank","doi":"10.3326/pse.47.3.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Central government aims to stimulate the efficiency and technical change of pub - lic organizations. However, government primarily focuses on the institutions that deliver final public services, but not on the policy making institutions. This article analyses the productivity of central government departments (CGDs). From bureaucratic theory we hypothesize that productivity of these CGDs are low. In order to measure efficiency and technical change we estimate an average cost function based on data of Dutch individual CGDs during the period 2012-2019. The dataset consists of data on various services provided, resource usage and efficiency determinants. The cost function is estimated by a mixed-effect non-lin - ear least squares method. The outcomes show that there are large efficiency differ - ences among CGDs. It is also striking that technical change of the CGDs is non-existent over time, probably due to a lack of innovative behaviour, unwieldy bureaucracies and increasingly complex paperwork.","PeriodicalId":37447,"journal":{"name":"Public Sector Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Sector Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3326/pse.47.3.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central government aims to stimulate the efficiency and technical change of pub - lic organizations. However, government primarily focuses on the institutions that deliver final public services, but not on the policy making institutions. This article analyses the productivity of central government departments (CGDs). From bureaucratic theory we hypothesize that productivity of these CGDs are low. In order to measure efficiency and technical change we estimate an average cost function based on data of Dutch individual CGDs during the period 2012-2019. The dataset consists of data on various services provided, resource usage and efficiency determinants. The cost function is estimated by a mixed-effect non-lin - ear least squares method. The outcomes show that there are large efficiency differ - ences among CGDs. It is also striking that technical change of the CGDs is non-existent over time, probably due to a lack of innovative behaviour, unwieldy bureaucracies and increasingly complex paperwork.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中央政府部门的生产力和效率:应用于2012-2019年荷兰数据的混合效应模型
中央政府的目标是促进公共组织的效率和技术变革。然而,政府主要关注的是提供最终公共服务的机构,而不是政策制定机构。本文对中央政府部门的生产力进行了分析。根据官僚理论,我们假设这些cgd的生产率较低。为了衡量效率和技术变革,我们根据2012-2019年期间荷兰个人cgd的数据估计了平均成本函数。该数据集包括有关所提供的各种服务、资源使用和效率决定因素的数据。用混合效应非线性最小二乘法估计代价函数。结果表明,cgd之间存在较大的效率差异。同样令人惊讶的是,随着时间的推移,cgd的技术变化并不存在,这可能是由于缺乏创新行为,笨拙的官僚主义和日益复杂的文书工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Sector Economics
Public Sector Economics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Sector Economics is double blind peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Institute of Public Finance, which seeks theoretical, empirical and policy-oriented contributions analysing the role and functioning of the public sector at macroeconomic, sectoral and microeconomic levels, in both advanced and emerging market economies. We also aim to provide a professional forum for the discussion of contemporary public policy issues and actively seek survey articles, appraisals of current policy debates, shorter notes and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
How can the preferences of policy makers be operationalised in optimum control problems with macroeconometric models? A case study for Slovenian fiscal policies Perceived unmet healthcare needs among older Europeans in the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: the telemedicine solution Is the use of the investment resources allocated to municipalities in Cameroon efficient? Fiscal decentralization and gender equality: empirical evidence across countries Taxpayers' attitudes toward tax compliance in the Slovenian tax system: differences according to gender, income level and size of settlement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1