Cranial anatomy of Andinodelphys cochabambensis, a stem metatherian from the early Palaeocene of Bolivia

IF 1.5 3区 地球科学 Q2 PALEONTOLOGY Geodiversitas Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI:10.5252/geodiversitas2020v42a30
C. de Muizon, Sandrine Ladevèze
{"title":"Cranial anatomy of Andinodelphys cochabambensis, a stem metatherian from the early Palaeocene of Bolivia","authors":"C. de Muizon, Sandrine Ladevèze","doi":"10.5252/geodiversitas2020v42a30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Andinodelphys cochabambensis Marshall & Muizon, 1988 is one of the best preserved metatherian species from the early Palaeocene fauna of Tiupampa (Bolivia). It is represented by five almost complete skulls, three of them being securely associated to sub-complete to partial skeleton. Four skulls could be extracted from a block including several intermingled skeletons. The present paper provides a thorough description of the dental, cranial, and dentary anatomy of A. cochabambensis. The cranial anatomy of A. cochabambensis is similar to that of Pucadelphys andinus. The skull of Andinodelphys however differs from that of Pucadelphys in its larger size and proportionally longer rostrum. Other differences include the presence, in Andinodelphys, of large anteriorly protruding I1s, small palatal vacuities, a transverse canal, and a small hypotympanic sinus. Andinodelphys has the same dental formula as Pucadelphys (I 5/4, C 1/1, P 3/3, M4/4), the plesiomorphic condition for metatherians. Furthermore, both genera share the lack a tympanic process of the alisphenoid, a deep groove for the internal carotid artery at the anterior apex of the promontorium, a small prootic canal perforating the lateral edge of the petrosal and opening laterally in the deep sulcus for the prootic sinus, and a vestigial anterior lamina of the petrosal. Dentally Andinodelphys closely resembles Pucadelphys, the two genera differing in the larger size of the former and in the inconstant presence in the former of a twinned stylar cusp C. Although 25% smaller, the cheek teeth of Andinodelphys closely resemble those of Itaboraidelphys camposi from the early Eocene of Itaboraí (Brazil). As far as dental morphology is concerned, both genera are likely to have diverged from a direct common ancestor, probably Andinodelphys-like, with Itaboraidelphys displaying more derived dental structures. Two isolated petrosal from Itaboraí (Type 2 petrosals) are morphologically close to those of Andinodelphys but distinctly larger. In this paper, a previous interpretation including the teeth of Itaboraidelphys and these petrosals in the same taxon is followed. A phylogenetic analysis retrieved Itaboraidelphys as a sister taxon of the clade Pucadelphys + Andinodelphys, thus lending support to inclusion of the former in the Pucadelphyidae. Three sets of parsimony analyses were performed. A first set of analyses (with all characters) retrieved a strict consensus tree with a clade as follows: (pucadelphyids, (deltatheroidans (stagodontids, Gurlin Tsav skull-GTS), sparassodonts)). An implied weighting analysis with the same data matrix placed the stagodontids in an early diverging position but retained a clade (pucadelphyids, (deltatheroidans, (GTS, sparassodonts))), the deltatheroidans, being therefore inserted in the pucadelphydans. This result implies an independent arrival of pucadelphyids and sparassodonts to South America, which consequently must have been present in North America in the Late Cretaceous. Possible North American sparassodonts could be the poorly known genera Atokatheridium and Olklatheridium (currently referred to deltatheroidans) and the pucadelphyids may have been present in the Late Cretaceous of North America with the genus Aenigmadelphys. However, this hypothesis is less parsimonious (with regard to palaeobiogeography) than a single southward migration of an ancestral Pucadelphyda (Pucadelphyidae + Sparassodonta). Because the result of this first set of analyses may have been induced by heavily homoplastic dental characters related to hypercarnivory, a second set of analyses was performed excluding all the dental characters. The strict consensus is poorly resolved but retains monophyletic Marsupialia and Sparassodonta. An implied weighting analysis retrieved a monophyletic Pucadelphyda but split the deltatheroidans, the polyphyly of which is regarded as a possible artefact related to the lack of dental characters. The GTS is sister taxon to Pucadelphyda. Because the polyphyly of deltatheroidans contradicts all previous hypotheses, a third set of analyses has been performed excluding only those molar characters that supported the close relationships of the hypercarnivorous clades (deltatheroids, stagodontids, and sparassodonts). The strict consensus tree retrieved monophyletic deltatheroidans, Marsupialia and sparassodonts. An implied weighting analysis resulted in deltatheroidans forming a paraphyletic stem assemblage of Metatheria and monophyletic Pucadelphyda. The GTS was no longer related to sparassodonts but was the sister taxon of a clade including the North American taxa of the data matrix, Asiatherium, and Marsupialia. This topology, which is favoured here, supports (as well as that of the second set of analyses) a single pucadelphydan southward migration, probably in the Late Cretaceous, with a Tiupampian radiation of South American carnivorous metatherians.","PeriodicalId":55111,"journal":{"name":"Geodiversitas","volume":"42 1","pages":"597 - 739"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geodiversitas","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5252/geodiversitas2020v42a30","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

ABSTRACT Andinodelphys cochabambensis Marshall & Muizon, 1988 is one of the best preserved metatherian species from the early Palaeocene fauna of Tiupampa (Bolivia). It is represented by five almost complete skulls, three of them being securely associated to sub-complete to partial skeleton. Four skulls could be extracted from a block including several intermingled skeletons. The present paper provides a thorough description of the dental, cranial, and dentary anatomy of A. cochabambensis. The cranial anatomy of A. cochabambensis is similar to that of Pucadelphys andinus. The skull of Andinodelphys however differs from that of Pucadelphys in its larger size and proportionally longer rostrum. Other differences include the presence, in Andinodelphys, of large anteriorly protruding I1s, small palatal vacuities, a transverse canal, and a small hypotympanic sinus. Andinodelphys has the same dental formula as Pucadelphys (I 5/4, C 1/1, P 3/3, M4/4), the plesiomorphic condition for metatherians. Furthermore, both genera share the lack a tympanic process of the alisphenoid, a deep groove for the internal carotid artery at the anterior apex of the promontorium, a small prootic canal perforating the lateral edge of the petrosal and opening laterally in the deep sulcus for the prootic sinus, and a vestigial anterior lamina of the petrosal. Dentally Andinodelphys closely resembles Pucadelphys, the two genera differing in the larger size of the former and in the inconstant presence in the former of a twinned stylar cusp C. Although 25% smaller, the cheek teeth of Andinodelphys closely resemble those of Itaboraidelphys camposi from the early Eocene of Itaboraí (Brazil). As far as dental morphology is concerned, both genera are likely to have diverged from a direct common ancestor, probably Andinodelphys-like, with Itaboraidelphys displaying more derived dental structures. Two isolated petrosal from Itaboraí (Type 2 petrosals) are morphologically close to those of Andinodelphys but distinctly larger. In this paper, a previous interpretation including the teeth of Itaboraidelphys and these petrosals in the same taxon is followed. A phylogenetic analysis retrieved Itaboraidelphys as a sister taxon of the clade Pucadelphys + Andinodelphys, thus lending support to inclusion of the former in the Pucadelphyidae. Three sets of parsimony analyses were performed. A first set of analyses (with all characters) retrieved a strict consensus tree with a clade as follows: (pucadelphyids, (deltatheroidans (stagodontids, Gurlin Tsav skull-GTS), sparassodonts)). An implied weighting analysis with the same data matrix placed the stagodontids in an early diverging position but retained a clade (pucadelphyids, (deltatheroidans, (GTS, sparassodonts))), the deltatheroidans, being therefore inserted in the pucadelphydans. This result implies an independent arrival of pucadelphyids and sparassodonts to South America, which consequently must have been present in North America in the Late Cretaceous. Possible North American sparassodonts could be the poorly known genera Atokatheridium and Olklatheridium (currently referred to deltatheroidans) and the pucadelphyids may have been present in the Late Cretaceous of North America with the genus Aenigmadelphys. However, this hypothesis is less parsimonious (with regard to palaeobiogeography) than a single southward migration of an ancestral Pucadelphyda (Pucadelphyidae + Sparassodonta). Because the result of this first set of analyses may have been induced by heavily homoplastic dental characters related to hypercarnivory, a second set of analyses was performed excluding all the dental characters. The strict consensus is poorly resolved but retains monophyletic Marsupialia and Sparassodonta. An implied weighting analysis retrieved a monophyletic Pucadelphyda but split the deltatheroidans, the polyphyly of which is regarded as a possible artefact related to the lack of dental characters. The GTS is sister taxon to Pucadelphyda. Because the polyphyly of deltatheroidans contradicts all previous hypotheses, a third set of analyses has been performed excluding only those molar characters that supported the close relationships of the hypercarnivorous clades (deltatheroids, stagodontids, and sparassodonts). The strict consensus tree retrieved monophyletic deltatheroidans, Marsupialia and sparassodonts. An implied weighting analysis resulted in deltatheroidans forming a paraphyletic stem assemblage of Metatheria and monophyletic Pucadelphyda. The GTS was no longer related to sparassodonts but was the sister taxon of a clade including the North American taxa of the data matrix, Asiatherium, and Marsupialia. This topology, which is favoured here, supports (as well as that of the second set of analyses) a single pucadelphydan southward migration, probably in the Late Cretaceous, with a Tiupampian radiation of South American carnivorous metatherians.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玻利维亚古新世早期的一种茎类美塔兽——科恰班班安斑龙(Andinodelphys cochabambensis)的颅骨解剖
摘要Andinodelphis cochabambensis Marshall&Muizon,1988是蒂乌帕(玻利维亚)古新世早期动物群中保存最完好的后生动物之一。它由五个几乎完整的头骨代表,其中三个与亚完整到部分骨骼紧密相连。四个头骨可以从一个包括几个混合骨骼的块中提取出来。本文对a.cochabambensis的牙齿、颅骨和牙齿解剖进行了全面的描述。A.cochabambensis的颅骨解剖结构与Pucadelphis andinus相似。然而,Andinodelphis的头骨与Pucadelphis的不同之处在于其更大的尺寸和相应的更长的喙。其他差异包括在Andinodelphis中存在大的向前突出的I1、小的腭部空洞、横管和小的下交感窦。Andinodelphis具有与Pucadelphis相同的牙科配方(I 5/4,C 1/1,P 3/3,M4/4),这是metatherians的准同形条件。此外,这两个属都有一个共同的缺点,即缺乏一个泽泻样的鼓突,一个位于海角前尖的颈内动脉深沟,一个穿过岩侧边缘并在深沟中侧向开口的小前耳管,以及一个残留的岩前板。Andinodelphis在牙齿上与Pucadelphis非常相似,这两个属的区别在于前者的体型较大,前者的柄尖C不稳定。尽管小25%,但Andinodelphes的颊齿与Itaboraí(巴西)始新世早期的Itaboraidelphis camposi的颊齿非常相似。就牙齿形态而言,这两个属都可能是从一个直接的共同祖先分化而来的,可能是类似Andinodelphis的,而Itaboraidelphis显示出更多衍生的牙齿结构。Itaboraí的两个孤立岩(2型岩)在形态上与Andinodelphis的岩相似,但明显更大。在这篇论文中,遵循了先前的解释,包括在同一分类单元中的梨形目和这些岩类的牙齿。一项系统发育分析检索到Itaboraidelphys是Pucadelphys+Andinodelphys分支的姐妹分类单元,从而支持将前者纳入Pucadelphidae。进行了三组简约分析。第一组分析(包括所有特征)检索到一个严格的一致树,其分支如下:(pucadelphiids,(三角兽纲(鹿齿目,Gurlin Tsav头骨GTS),sparassodonts))。具有相同数据矩阵的隐含加权分析将鹿齿目置于早期分叉位置,但保留了一个分支(pucadelphids,(三角兽齿目,(GTS,sparassodonts)),因此三角兽齿类被插入到pucadelfids中。这一结果意味着Pucadelphids和Sparassodons独立到达南美洲,因此它们一定在白垩纪晚期存在于北美洲。北美洲可能的裂头龙属可能是鲜为人知的Atokatheridium属和Olklatheridius属(目前被称为三角兽目),而pucadelphids可能与Aenigdadelphys属一起存在于北美洲白垩纪晚期。然而,这一假设(就古生物地理学而言)不如祖先Pucadelphida(Pucadelyidae+Sparassodonta)的一次南迁那么简单。由于第一组分析的结果可能是由与高碱性饮食相关的高度同源性牙齿特征引起的,因此进行了第二组分析,排除了所有牙齿特征。严格的一致性很难解决,但保留了单系有袋动物和雀形目。隐含加权分析检索到一个单系Pucadelphyda,但分裂了三角兽目,其多系性被认为是与缺乏牙齿特征有关的可能伪影。GTS是Pucadelphyda的姐妹分类单元。由于三角兽亚目的多聚性与之前的所有假设相矛盾,因此进行了第三组分析,仅排除了那些支持高食肉分支(三角兽亚纲、鹿齿亚目和盾齿亚目)密切关系的臼齿特征。严格一致树检索到了单系三角洲动物、有袋动物和裂头动物。隐含加权分析结果表明,三角兽目形成了Metatheria和单系Pucadelphida的系旁茎组合。GTS不再与雀形目有亲缘关系,而是一个分支的姐妹分类单元,包括数据矩阵的北美分类单元、亚洲目和有袋目。这种拓扑结构在这里很受欢迎,它支持(以及第二组分析的拓扑结构)可能在白垩纪晚期,伴随着南美洲肉食性后生动物的蒂潘派辐射,有一次pucadelphidan向南迁移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geodiversitas
Geodiversitas 地学-古生物学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geodiversitas is a fully electronic journal, with a continuous publication stream, devoted to varied aspects of Earth Sciences. It publishes original results particularly on systematics, phylogeny, paleobiodiversity and paleoenvironment. Thematic issues may also be published under the responsibility of a guest editor.
期刊最新文献
New early aeluroid carnivoran (Mammalia, Carnivora, Feliformia) from the classical palaeontological locality Valeč, the Czech Republic Systematic revision of Neoreomys huilensis Fields, 1957 (Rodentia, Hystricognathi) from the Middle Miocene of La Venta (Villavieja, Colombia) Crayfishes from the Jehol biota A new species of mecochirid lobster from the Late Cretaceous of France, preserved with its eggs A new platyrostrine sperm whale from the Early Miocene of the southeastern Pacific (East Pisco Basin, Peru) supports affinities with the southwestern Atlantic cetacean fauna
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1