(Techno-)Utopias and the Question of Natural Boundaries

Georg Jochum
{"title":"(Techno-)Utopias and the Question of Natural Boundaries","authors":"Georg Jochum","doi":"10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2020.13.1.1032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two key issues are currently dominating the discourse on the future: On the one hand, technological and especially digital transformation, on the other hand the socioecological transformation towards sustainable development, which takes into account ecological boundaries. Both topics are becoming increasingly linked, but there is no consensus on the direction of the upcoming socio-eco-technological transformation. As stated in the article, the controversies and the different concepts are influenced by the utopian traditions of modernity. In particular, the technical utopia ‘Nova Atlantis’ by Bacon, and the paradigmatic social utopia ‘Utopia’ by More are crucial. The hegemonic technology-oriented sustainability concepts are in the tradition of Bacon. Since they continue modern expansionism, they are inadequate to solve the ecological crisis. Approaches in the tradition of social utopia may be more likely to solve the crisis, as they include more comprehensive socio-eco-technical imaginaries of a sustainable future.","PeriodicalId":30203,"journal":{"name":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","volume":"13 1","pages":"7-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2020.13.1.1032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Two key issues are currently dominating the discourse on the future: On the one hand, technological and especially digital transformation, on the other hand the socioecological transformation towards sustainable development, which takes into account ecological boundaries. Both topics are becoming increasingly linked, but there is no consensus on the direction of the upcoming socio-eco-technological transformation. As stated in the article, the controversies and the different concepts are influenced by the utopian traditions of modernity. In particular, the technical utopia ‘Nova Atlantis’ by Bacon, and the paradigmatic social utopia ‘Utopia’ by More are crucial. The hegemonic technology-oriented sustainability concepts are in the tradition of Bacon. Since they continue modern expansionism, they are inadequate to solve the ecological crisis. Approaches in the tradition of social utopia may be more likely to solve the crisis, as they include more comprehensive socio-eco-technical imaginaries of a sustainable future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(技术)乌托邦与自然边界问题
两个关键问题目前主导着关于未来的讨论:一方面是技术转型,尤其是数字化转型,另一方面是考虑到生态边界的向可持续发展的社会生态转型。这两个话题的联系越来越紧密,但对于即将到来的社会生态技术转型的方向还没有达成共识。正如文章所说,这些争论和不同的概念都受到了现代乌托邦传统的影响。尤其是培根的技术乌托邦“新亚特兰蒂斯”和莫尔的范式社会乌托邦“乌托邦”至关重要。以技术为导向的霸权可持续发展观是培根的传统。由于他们继续现代扩张主义,他们不足以解决生态危机。社会乌托邦传统中的方法可能更有可能解决危机,因为它们包括对可持续未来的更全面的社会生态技术想象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Louise Amoore: Cloud Ethics. Algorithms and the Attributes of Ourselves and Others Editorial: Futures of Critique in the Digital Age „Wie ist Geschichte a priori möglich?“ Algorithmische Vorhersage und die Aufgabe der Kritik Distributed Planned Economies in the Age of their Technical Feasibility Landnahme, analog und digital. Ursprüngliche Akkumulation in den Kontrollgesellschaften
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1