An integrated valuation model for payer and investor

M. Nuijten, S. Capri
{"title":"An integrated valuation model for payer and investor","authors":"M. Nuijten, S. Capri","doi":"10.1080/20016689.2022.2080631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background In order to optimize positioning and associated drug price for both payer and investor, it is for a company essential to forecast the potential market access attractiveness for the new drug for different indications at the early onset of the clinical development program. This analysis must include the constraints from the perspective of the payer, but also the biotech companies, who require a minimum drug price to satisfy their investors. This paper aims to provide an Integrated Valuation Model for payer and investor, bridging concepts from health economics and economic valuation reflecting the perspectives of the payer and the investor for a drug in early clinical development phase. The concept is illustrated for a new hypothetical drug (Product X) in advanced breast cancer in 1-line, 2-line, and 3-line position. Methods The Integrated Valuation Model includes the outcomes of the budget impact model, pricing matrix model, and cost-effectiveness model reflecting the payer’s perspective. These models are interacted and linked with a discounted cash flow model in order to reflect also the economic value from the investor’s perspective. Results The maximum price in 1-line position is €269.7 for the payer and the minimum price is €14.7 for the investor, which are unit prices per administration corresponding with treatment regimens for the comparative treatments. In 2-line position, the maximum price is €274.1 for the payer and the minimum price for the investor increases to €184.5 for the investor because of the smaller market size in 2-line position, which leads to a smaller pricing corridor to satisfy both payer and investor. Consequently, Product X has market access attractiveness for both payer and investor in 1-line and 2-line position. However, the minimum price €942.7 in 3-line position for the investor is higher than the maximum price €283.3 for the payer, which means there is no market potential. Conclusion The practical strategic application of the Integrated Valuation Model is optimization of positioning and price of Product X. Hence, it can be a transparent tool in early-stage development of a compound based on upfront assessment of market access attractiveness for the payer and the investor.","PeriodicalId":73811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of market access & health policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of market access & health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2022.2080631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background In order to optimize positioning and associated drug price for both payer and investor, it is for a company essential to forecast the potential market access attractiveness for the new drug for different indications at the early onset of the clinical development program. This analysis must include the constraints from the perspective of the payer, but also the biotech companies, who require a minimum drug price to satisfy their investors. This paper aims to provide an Integrated Valuation Model for payer and investor, bridging concepts from health economics and economic valuation reflecting the perspectives of the payer and the investor for a drug in early clinical development phase. The concept is illustrated for a new hypothetical drug (Product X) in advanced breast cancer in 1-line, 2-line, and 3-line position. Methods The Integrated Valuation Model includes the outcomes of the budget impact model, pricing matrix model, and cost-effectiveness model reflecting the payer’s perspective. These models are interacted and linked with a discounted cash flow model in order to reflect also the economic value from the investor’s perspective. Results The maximum price in 1-line position is €269.7 for the payer and the minimum price is €14.7 for the investor, which are unit prices per administration corresponding with treatment regimens for the comparative treatments. In 2-line position, the maximum price is €274.1 for the payer and the minimum price for the investor increases to €184.5 for the investor because of the smaller market size in 2-line position, which leads to a smaller pricing corridor to satisfy both payer and investor. Consequently, Product X has market access attractiveness for both payer and investor in 1-line and 2-line position. However, the minimum price €942.7 in 3-line position for the investor is higher than the maximum price €283.3 for the payer, which means there is no market potential. Conclusion The practical strategic application of the Integrated Valuation Model is optimization of positioning and price of Product X. Hence, it can be a transparent tool in early-stage development of a compound based on upfront assessment of market access attractiveness for the payer and the investor.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
付款人和投资者的综合估值模型
背景:为了优化支付方和投资者的定位和相关的药品价格,企业在临床开发项目的早期就必须预测不同适应症新药的潜在市场准入吸引力。这种分析必须包括付款人的限制,也包括生物技术公司的限制,这些公司要求最低药价来满足他们的投资者。本文旨在为支付方和投资方提供一个综合评估模型,将卫生经济学和经济评估的概念结合起来,反映出早期临床开发阶段药物支付方和投资方的观点。这一概念以一种新的假设性药物(产品X)为例,分别在1线、2线和3线位置进行说明。方法综合评估模型包括预算影响模型、定价矩阵模型和反映支付方视角的成本-效果模型的结果。这些模型相互作用,并与贴现现金流模型联系在一起,以便从投资者的角度反映经济价值。结果对比治疗中,支付方1线位最高价格为269.7欧元,投资者1线位最低价格为14.7欧元,为与治疗方案对应的单药单价。在2线头寸中,支付方的最高价格为274.1欧元,投资者的最低价格增加到184.5欧元,因为2线头寸的市场规模较小,这导致了一个较小的定价走廊来满足支付方和投资者。因此,X产品对1线和2线位置的支付方和投资者都具有市场准入吸引力。然而,对于投资者来说,3线头寸的最低价格为942.7欧元,高于付款人的最高价格283.3欧元,这意味着没有市场潜力。结论综合估值模型的实际战略应用是对x产品的定位和价格进行优化。因此,基于对支付方和投资者市场准入吸引力的前期评估,它可以成为一个透明的工具,用于化合物的早期开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Knowledge and Application of Economics in Healthcare in a High-Income Country Today: The Case of Belgium. Non-Medical Switching or Discontinuation Patterns among Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the United States: A Claims-Based Analysis. Proposal of a Knowledge Management Model for Complex Systems: Case of the Supervision and Control Subsystem of the Colombian Health System. Adoption of a Societal Perspective in Economic Evaluations of Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Conceptual Paper. Patient Experience and Satisfaction with Orthopedic Services at a Community (Rural) Setting Hospital-How Is It Different from Urban Setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1