Neopresidentialism and the hierarchy of power in Latin American Integration

Daniel Morales Ruvalcaba
{"title":"Neopresidentialism and the hierarchy of power in Latin American Integration","authors":"Daniel Morales Ruvalcaba","doi":"10.5354/0719-3769.2020.57660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The process of building Latin American autonomy through regional integration has lost its momentum in recent years and in some cases, are seriously questioned. The hypothesis put forward here is that Latin American neopresidentialism is replicated in regional institutions configurating an essentially intergovernmental integration model which, combined with the logic of the hierarchy of power in the international order, ends up giving privileges to the most powerful countries. Thus, the agendas promoted from the regional and subregional Latin American organizations are those that interest the countries that are better positioned in the international structure and possess greater capacities to implement the agreements. Taking the “Unión de Naciones Suramericanas” (UNASUR) as a case study, is possible to * Special acknowledgments to Garrett Thompson for his professional support in reviewing this work. * Doctor en Ciencias Sociales (Universidad de Guadalajara), Maestro en Estudios Contemporáneos de América Latina (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) y Licenciado en Estudios Internacionales (Universidad de Guadalajara). Actualmente es investigador en el Centro de Estudios Latinoamericanos de la Universidad Sun Yat-sen (China) y miembro del Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (México). Ha trabajado como profesor en universidades de México, España, Polonia y China. Además, ha realizado estancias de investigación en la Universidad de la República, en el Centre de Recherches Internationales (Sciences Po) y en la Universidad Maria Curie-Skłodowska. Correo electrónico: morales@mail.sysu.edu.cn. ORCID: https://orcid. org/0000-0002-4304-3831. Recibido: 09 de febrero de 2020. Modificado: 28 de junio de 2020. Aceptado: 29 de junio de 2020. Estudios Internacionales 197 (2020) • Universidad de Chile 40 corroborate that neopresidentialism and the hierarchy of power have conditioned the institutionality and agenda of this organization, placing the political ideology of the presidents and national interests above the regional interests.","PeriodicalId":30847,"journal":{"name":"Estudios Internacionales","volume":"52 1","pages":"39-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios Internacionales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-3769.2020.57660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The process of building Latin American autonomy through regional integration has lost its momentum in recent years and in some cases, are seriously questioned. The hypothesis put forward here is that Latin American neopresidentialism is replicated in regional institutions configurating an essentially intergovernmental integration model which, combined with the logic of the hierarchy of power in the international order, ends up giving privileges to the most powerful countries. Thus, the agendas promoted from the regional and subregional Latin American organizations are those that interest the countries that are better positioned in the international structure and possess greater capacities to implement the agreements. Taking the “Unión de Naciones Suramericanas” (UNASUR) as a case study, is possible to * Special acknowledgments to Garrett Thompson for his professional support in reviewing this work. * Doctor en Ciencias Sociales (Universidad de Guadalajara), Maestro en Estudios Contemporáneos de América Latina (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) y Licenciado en Estudios Internacionales (Universidad de Guadalajara). Actualmente es investigador en el Centro de Estudios Latinoamericanos de la Universidad Sun Yat-sen (China) y miembro del Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (México). Ha trabajado como profesor en universidades de México, España, Polonia y China. Además, ha realizado estancias de investigación en la Universidad de la República, en el Centre de Recherches Internationales (Sciences Po) y en la Universidad Maria Curie-Skłodowska. Correo electrónico: morales@mail.sysu.edu.cn. ORCID: https://orcid. org/0000-0002-4304-3831. Recibido: 09 de febrero de 2020. Modificado: 28 de junio de 2020. Aceptado: 29 de junio de 2020. Estudios Internacionales 197 (2020) • Universidad de Chile 40 corroborate that neopresidentialism and the hierarchy of power have conditioned the institutionality and agenda of this organization, placing the political ideology of the presidents and national interests above the regional interests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新总统主义与拉美一体化中的权力等级制度
近年来,通过区域一体化建立拉丁美洲自治的进程失去了势头,在某些情况下,这一进程受到了严重质疑。这里提出的假设是,拉丁美洲的新总统主义在区域机构中得到了复制,形成了一种基本上是政府间一体化模式,该模式结合国际秩序中权力等级的逻辑,最终赋予最强大的国家特权。因此,拉丁美洲区域和次区域组织推动的议程是那些在国际结构中地位更好、执行协定能力更强的国家感兴趣的议程。以“南美国家联盟”为案例研究,可以*特别感谢加勒特·汤普森在审查这项工作时的专业支持。*社会科学博士(瓜达拉哈拉大学),拉丁美洲当代研究硕士(马德里康普顿斯大学),国际研究学士(瓜达拉哈拉大学)。他目前是中山大学拉丁美洲研究中心(中国)的研究员和国家研究人员系统(墨西哥)的成员。他曾在墨西哥、西班牙、波兰和中国的大学担任教授。此外,他还在共和国大学、国际研究中心和玛丽亚·居里-斯科多夫斯卡大学进行了研究。电子邮件:morales@mail.sysu.edu.cn.奥西德:https://orcid.组织/0000-0002-4304-3831。收到:2020年2月9日。修改:2020年6月28日。接受:2020年6月29日。国际研究197(2020年)•智利大学40证实,新总统主义和权力等级制度为该组织的体制和议程创造了条件,使总统和国家利益的政治意识形态高于区域利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
building of Brazilian Party System Guerra Fría, Reforma Agraria y patrimonio agroalimentario: la Empresa Pisquera del Estado (Chile, 1970-1973) inner circle of presidents Confiança na polícia e atitudes políticas autoritárias na América Latina Sustainability in Latin America and the Caribbean
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1