Still no bodies: Five years of “no body, no parole” in Queensland, Australia

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Criminology Pub Date : 2022-03-15 DOI:10.1177/26338076221087458
Monique Moffa, M. Ruyters, G. Stratton
{"title":"Still no bodies: Five years of “no body, no parole” in Queensland, Australia","authors":"Monique Moffa, M. Ruyters, G. Stratton","doi":"10.1177/26338076221087458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“No body, no parole” laws have been introduced in and expanded across Australia since 2015. These reforms were politically premised on the notion of providing closure to victims’ families by compelling prisoners convicted of homicide offences to disclose the location of their victims’ remains in order to be considered eligible to apply for parole. These laws are in operation in most states and territories across Australia despite low national numbers of reported no body homicides. Most Australian jurisdictions do not publish parole decisions, and Queensland is one of only two jurisdictions that require no body, no parole decisions to be made public. This article reviews the roll-out of the “no body” laws in Queensland and considers the potential to misuse the victims’ movement for political gain. We examine the ten published decisions made by the Parole Board Queensland under s193A of the Corrective Services Act 2006 (Qld) to date and discuss the extent to which the legislative aims of the reforms have been met. We argue that there is little evidence these reforms have achieved their aims, and there is a risk that the politicization of parole regimes exploits the victims’ rights movement by offering victims’ families false hope.","PeriodicalId":29902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminology","volume":"55 1","pages":"162 - 179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26338076221087458","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“No body, no parole” laws have been introduced in and expanded across Australia since 2015. These reforms were politically premised on the notion of providing closure to victims’ families by compelling prisoners convicted of homicide offences to disclose the location of their victims’ remains in order to be considered eligible to apply for parole. These laws are in operation in most states and territories across Australia despite low national numbers of reported no body homicides. Most Australian jurisdictions do not publish parole decisions, and Queensland is one of only two jurisdictions that require no body, no parole decisions to be made public. This article reviews the roll-out of the “no body” laws in Queensland and considers the potential to misuse the victims’ movement for political gain. We examine the ten published decisions made by the Parole Board Queensland under s193A of the Corrective Services Act 2006 (Qld) to date and discuss the extent to which the legislative aims of the reforms have been met. We argue that there is little evidence these reforms have achieved their aims, and there is a risk that the politicization of parole regimes exploits the victims’ rights movement by offering victims’ families false hope.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
仍然没有尸体:在澳大利亚昆士兰州的五年里,“没有尸体,没有假释”
自2015年以来,“无尸体,无假释”的法律在澳大利亚引入并扩大了范围。这些改革的政治前提是,强迫被判犯有杀人罪的囚犯披露其受害者遗体的位置,以便被认为有资格申请假释,从而为受害者家属提供了结。这些法律在澳大利亚的大多数州和地区都在实施,尽管全国报告的无尸体杀人案数量很少。大多数澳大利亚司法管辖区不公布假释决定,昆士兰州是仅有的两个司法管辖区之一,不要求任何机构,不要求公开假释决定。本文回顾了昆士兰州“无尸法”的推广,并考虑了滥用受害者运动以获取政治利益的可能性。我们审查了迄今为止昆士兰假释委员会根据《2006年矫正服务法》(Qld)第193a条作出的10项公开决定,并讨论了改革的立法目标在多大程度上得到了实现。我们认为,几乎没有证据表明这些改革已经实现了它们的目标,而且假释制度的政治化有可能通过给受害者家属提供虚假的希望来利用受害者的权利运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Criminology
Journal of Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Public views of sexual assault, and its prevention, in residential aged care facilities Intimate partner homicide in New Zealand, 2004–2019. Risk markers, demographic patterns, and prevalence Realisation of the principle of normalisation in the adoption of ICTs in a women's prison: A Finnish qualitative study Lived experiences at the intersection: Understanding the overlap of family violence and mental health for victim-survivors and consumers in Victoria, Australia Integrating standard and network psychometrics to assess the quality of prison life in Serbia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1