Criticism of the Pro-LGBT’s Misinterpretation of the Quranic Verses on the Illegality of LGBT

M. Muslih, Munar Moh Shobirin, Netty Yuwanda, Jajang Supriatna
{"title":"Criticism of the Pro-LGBT’s Misinterpretation of the Quranic Verses on the Illegality of LGBT","authors":"M. Muslih, Munar Moh Shobirin, Netty Yuwanda, Jajang Supriatna","doi":"10.24014/jush.v30i1.14274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study discusses various pro-LGBT arguments based on QS. al-Hujurat[49]:13 and QS. al-A’raf [7]: 80-84 and QS. Hud [11]:77-82. Then, the location of their mistakes in interpreting the verse is explained by showing Muslim commentators’ views on the verses used as arguments. To find out the strength and measure the scientificity of these arguments. From this problem, this research will discuss the arguments of LGBT supporters, which are justified by the verses they quote. The method used in this research is the descriptive method and critical analysis. The results of this study can be concluded in several points; First, LGBT and homosexuals have the same conception. Second, the arguments of LGBT supporters seem compelling. Third, the arguments based on the verses of the Qur’an seem far-fetched because there is no strong argument to reject the interpretation of the mufassir. Finally, the partial understanding of LGBT supporters does not reach the essence or content of the verse","PeriodicalId":17770,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ushuluddin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ushuluddin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v30i1.14274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study discusses various pro-LGBT arguments based on QS. al-Hujurat[49]:13 and QS. al-A’raf [7]: 80-84 and QS. Hud [11]:77-82. Then, the location of their mistakes in interpreting the verse is explained by showing Muslim commentators’ views on the verses used as arguments. To find out the strength and measure the scientificity of these arguments. From this problem, this research will discuss the arguments of LGBT supporters, which are justified by the verses they quote. The method used in this research is the descriptive method and critical analysis. The results of this study can be concluded in several points; First, LGBT and homosexuals have the same conception. Second, the arguments of LGBT supporters seem compelling. Third, the arguments based on the verses of the Qur’an seem far-fetched because there is no strong argument to reject the interpretation of the mufassir. Finally, the partial understanding of LGBT supporters does not reach the essence or content of the verse
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
批评亲LGBT人士对《古兰经》中关于LGBT是非法性的经文的误解
本研究讨论了基于QS的各种支持lgbt的论点。al-Hujurat b[49]:13和QS。al-A 'raf b[7]: 80-84和QS。住房和城市发展部[11]:77 - 82。然后,通过展示穆斯林评论家对用作论据的经文的看法来解释他们在解释经文时所犯错误的位置。找出这些论点的力量和衡量的科学性。从这个问题出发,本研究将讨论LGBT支持者的论点,他们引用的经文证明了这一点。本研究使用的方法是描述性方法和批判性分析。本研究的结果可以归纳为几点;首先,LGBT和同性恋有着相同的概念。其次,LGBT支持者的论点似乎很有说服力。第三,基于古兰经经文的论点似乎牵强,因为没有强有力的论据来拒绝穆法希尔的解释。最后,LGBT支持者的片面理解没有触及经文的本质或内容
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE SPIRAL ANDROMEDA PARADIGM; An Interpretation on Science Integration of UIN Suska Riau Criticism of the Pro-LGBT’s Misinterpretation of the Quranic Verses on the Illegality of LGBT Application of Ijmālī Method In Exegesis (Sharḥ) The Hadith of The Prophet: Analysis of the Book of Hadith using the Ijmālī Method Sufis and Women: The Study of Women's Sufis in The Western World On Imam Ghazālī's Farḍ ‘Ain and Farḍ Kifāyah: An Epistemological Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1