Remote Sensing Data to Support Integrated Decision Making in Cultural and Natural Heritage Management. Impasses and opportunities for collaboration in agricultural areas

Q2 Arts and Humanities Internet Archaeology Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.11141/ia.62.10
Rachel Opitz, E. Baldwin, P. De Smedt, J. Verhegge, S. Campana, Victorino Mayoral Herrera, D. Powlesland, M. Vieri, C. Perna, D. Sarri
{"title":"Remote Sensing Data to Support Integrated Decision Making in Cultural and Natural Heritage Management. Impasses and opportunities for collaboration in agricultural areas","authors":"Rachel Opitz, E. Baldwin, P. De Smedt, J. Verhegge, S. Campana, Victorino Mayoral Herrera, D. Powlesland, M. Vieri, C. Perna, D. Sarri","doi":"10.11141/ia.62.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Remote and near surface sensing data are widely used in archaeology and heritage management for feature discovery, change detection and monitoring, as an input to predictive modelling, and in the planning process. While global and regional datasets are widely used for some purposes, data are regularly acquired specifically for archaeological projects because of the very high spatial resolution required for feature detection and assessments of archaeological significance and the need for data on subsurface features. The sensing data collected for archaeology cover limited areas and only a few types of sensors, known to produce data efficiently, are regularly employed. Precision agriculture is beginning to produce large quantities of varied sensing data across extensive landscape areas. This situation creates an opportunity to adapt and reuse precision agricultural data for archaeology and heritage work, extending covering and enhancing our understanding of archaeology in contemporary agricultural landscapes. Equally, there is potential for coordinated data collection, collecting data once for multiple applications, and to add value through analyses which bring together perspectives from multiple related domains to model long-term processes in anthropogenic soil systems. This article provides a high-level overview of policy and technological developments which create the potential for sensing data reuse, coordinated data collection, and collaborative analyses across archaeological, agricultural, and agri-environmental applications while underscoring the structural barriers which, at present, constrain this potential. It highlights examples where the development of interoperable data and workflows can promote tighter integration of archaeology and cultural heritage management with sustainable agricultural land management and support integrated decision making.","PeriodicalId":38724,"journal":{"name":"Internet Archaeology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.62.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Remote and near surface sensing data are widely used in archaeology and heritage management for feature discovery, change detection and monitoring, as an input to predictive modelling, and in the planning process. While global and regional datasets are widely used for some purposes, data are regularly acquired specifically for archaeological projects because of the very high spatial resolution required for feature detection and assessments of archaeological significance and the need for data on subsurface features. The sensing data collected for archaeology cover limited areas and only a few types of sensors, known to produce data efficiently, are regularly employed. Precision agriculture is beginning to produce large quantities of varied sensing data across extensive landscape areas. This situation creates an opportunity to adapt and reuse precision agricultural data for archaeology and heritage work, extending covering and enhancing our understanding of archaeology in contemporary agricultural landscapes. Equally, there is potential for coordinated data collection, collecting data once for multiple applications, and to add value through analyses which bring together perspectives from multiple related domains to model long-term processes in anthropogenic soil systems. This article provides a high-level overview of policy and technological developments which create the potential for sensing data reuse, coordinated data collection, and collaborative analyses across archaeological, agricultural, and agri-environmental applications while underscoring the structural barriers which, at present, constrain this potential. It highlights examples where the development of interoperable data and workflows can promote tighter integration of archaeology and cultural heritage management with sustainable agricultural land management and support integrated decision making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持文化和自然遗产管理综合决策的遥感数据。农业领域合作的障碍和机会
遥感和近地表遥感数据被广泛用于考古和遗产管理,用于特征发现、变化检测和监测,作为预测建模和规划过程的输入。虽然全球和区域数据集被广泛用于某些目的,但由于特征检测和考古意义评估所需的空间分辨率非常高,以及对地下特征数据的需求,因此经常专门为考古项目获取数据。为考古收集的传感数据覆盖的区域有限,只有少数类型的传感器被定期使用,这些传感器已知可以有效地产生数据。精准农业开始在广阔的景观区域产生大量不同的传感数据。这种情况为将精确的农业数据用于考古和遗产工作创造了机会,扩大了覆盖范围,增强了我们对当代农业景观考古的理解。同样,也有可能进行协调的数据收集,为多种应用收集一次数据,并通过将多个相关领域的观点结合起来的分析来增加价值,以模拟人类土壤系统的长期过程。本文对政策和技术发展进行了高层次的概述,这些政策和技术开发创造了传感数据再利用、协调数据收集和考古、农业和农业环境应用协同分析的潜力,同时强调了目前限制这一潜力的结构性障碍。它强调了可互操作数据和工作流程的开发可以促进考古和文化遗产管理与可持续农业土地管理的更紧密结合,并支持综合决策的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internet Archaeology
Internet Archaeology Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Open Archaeology, Open Source? Collaborative practices in an emerging community of archaeological software engineers The Ashwell Project: creating an online geospatial community Digitally Enlightened or Still in the Dark? Establishing a Sector-Wide Approach to Enhancing Data Synthesis and Research Potential in British Environmental Archaeology and Beyond 'All this in their ignorance they called civilisation': Analysing the Relationship between Nationalism and the Display of Roman Archaeology in Britain's National Museums Excavations at the Late Bronze Age site of Erimi-Pitharka, Cyprus (2022-2023 seasons): Regional production and storage in the Kouris Valley
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1