{"title":"A comparative study of nominal group systems and structures between\n Lhasa Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese","authors":"Pin Wang","doi":"10.1075/langct.00049.wan","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents a text-based comparative study of the\n construal of entities through nominal groups in Lhasa Tibetan and Mandarin\n Chinese. It approaches the grammatical description of nominal groups from the\n ideational and textual perspectives, and gives priority to the perspective “from\n above”, taking as point of departure the discourse semantic systems of\n ideation and identification. From the perspective of\n ideation, the comparison focuses on the classification, description\n and quantification of entities. From the perspective of identification,\n the comparison focuses on the presentation or presumption of entities in\n discourse, and the determination and qualification of them. In terms of\n grammatical realisations, the nucleus function of a nominal group, Thing, enters\n into multivariate structures with a range of pre- and post-Thing functions.\n However, configuration and realisation of the functions are language-specific.\n This study makes explicit structural consequences of systemic choices in nominal\n group grammar, and attends to the problem of structural markers, drawing on the\n notion of “subjacency” structure proposed in Martin et al. (2021) and Martin and Doran (this issue).","PeriodicalId":29846,"journal":{"name":"Language Context and Text-The Social Semiotics Forum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Context and Text-The Social Semiotics Forum","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00049.wan","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper presents a text-based comparative study of the
construal of entities through nominal groups in Lhasa Tibetan and Mandarin
Chinese. It approaches the grammatical description of nominal groups from the
ideational and textual perspectives, and gives priority to the perspective “from
above”, taking as point of departure the discourse semantic systems of
ideation and identification. From the perspective of
ideation, the comparison focuses on the classification, description
and quantification of entities. From the perspective of identification,
the comparison focuses on the presentation or presumption of entities in
discourse, and the determination and qualification of them. In terms of
grammatical realisations, the nucleus function of a nominal group, Thing, enters
into multivariate structures with a range of pre- and post-Thing functions.
However, configuration and realisation of the functions are language-specific.
This study makes explicit structural consequences of systemic choices in nominal
group grammar, and attends to the problem of structural markers, drawing on the
notion of “subjacency” structure proposed in Martin et al. (2021) and Martin and Doran (this issue).
本文以拉萨藏语和普通话为研究对象,对名义群体对实体的解释进行了基于文本的比较研究。它从概念和语篇的角度探讨名词群的语法描述,并以“从上面”的角度为优先,以概念和识别的话语语义系统为出发点。从概念的角度来看,比较侧重于实体的分类、描述和量化。从认同的角度来看,比较的重点是话语中实体的呈现或假设,以及它们的确定和限定。在语法实现方面,名词群的核心功能“物”进入多元结构,具有一系列“物前”和“物后”功能。然而,函数的配置和实现是特定于语言的。本研究明确了名称组语法中系统选择的结构后果,并关注结构标记的问题,借鉴了Martin et al.(2021)和Martin and Doran(本期)提出的“从属”结构的概念。