Nicolai Hartmann’s ethics. Feeling and cognition of values: between emotionalism and rationalism

Q4 Arts and Humanities Ruch Filozoficzny Pub Date : 2022-12-05 DOI:10.12775/rf.2022.022
Leszek Kopciuch
{"title":"Nicolai Hartmann’s ethics. Feeling and cognition of values: between emotionalism and rationalism","authors":"Leszek Kopciuch","doi":"10.12775/rf.2022.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to identify the most important elements of Hartmann’s understanding of “feeling of value” and to point out the ambiguities associated with this notion. The most important stages in the formation of this concept are delineated by the publications: Grundzüge einer Metaphysik der Erkenntnis, Ethik, Vom Wesen sittlicher Forderungen.[1] In all of these texts, Hartmann treats feeling of value as a proper way of knowing value, in relation to which philosophical cognition of value is only secondary and dependent. Hartmann’s understanding of feeling of value in ethics is, however, very broad, so that it somewhat loses the subtle divisions that were characteristic of the views of Max Scheler and Dietrich von Hildebrand. At the same time, however, Hartmann’s concept introduces several new elements that are important for the understanding of the nature of the feeling of value, such as, among others, the limited capacity of the axiological consciousness, the shifting horizon of values, or the relational reference of values to the person as the subject and addressee of an action and the reference to the situation in which a given action is taken. Moreover, to a greater extent than Scheler and von Hildebrand, Hartmann develops a field for the presence of rationalistic elements in the cognition of values.     ","PeriodicalId":36471,"journal":{"name":"Ruch Filozoficzny","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ruch Filozoficzny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/rf.2022.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to identify the most important elements of Hartmann’s understanding of “feeling of value” and to point out the ambiguities associated with this notion. The most important stages in the formation of this concept are delineated by the publications: Grundzüge einer Metaphysik der Erkenntnis, Ethik, Vom Wesen sittlicher Forderungen.[1] In all of these texts, Hartmann treats feeling of value as a proper way of knowing value, in relation to which philosophical cognition of value is only secondary and dependent. Hartmann’s understanding of feeling of value in ethics is, however, very broad, so that it somewhat loses the subtle divisions that were characteristic of the views of Max Scheler and Dietrich von Hildebrand. At the same time, however, Hartmann’s concept introduces several new elements that are important for the understanding of the nature of the feeling of value, such as, among others, the limited capacity of the axiological consciousness, the shifting horizon of values, or the relational reference of values to the person as the subject and addressee of an action and the reference to the situation in which a given action is taken. Moreover, to a greater extent than Scheler and von Hildebrand, Hartmann develops a field for the presence of rationalistic elements in the cognition of values.     
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼古拉·哈特曼的伦理学。情感与价值认知:介于情感主义与理性主义之间
本文的目的是确定哈特曼对“价值感”的理解中最重要的元素,并指出与这一概念相关的歧义。这一概念形成的最重要阶段由出版物描述:Grundzüge einer Metaphysik der Erkenntnis,Ethik,Vom Wesen sittlicher Fordungen。[1] 在所有这些文本中,哈特曼都将价值感视为一种正确的认识价值的方式,与之相关的价值哲学认知只是次要的和依赖的。然而,哈特曼对伦理学价值感的理解是非常宽泛的,因此它在某种程度上失去了马克斯·舍勒和迪特里希·冯·希尔德布兰德观点的微妙分歧。然而,与此同时,哈特曼的概念引入了几个对理解价值感的本质很重要的新元素,例如价值论意识的有限能力、价值观视野的变化,或价值观对作为行动主体和接受者的人的关系引用,以及对采取特定行动的情况的引用。此外,与舍勒和冯·希尔德布兰德相比,哈特曼在更大程度上为理性主义元素在价值认知中的存在开辟了一个领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ruch Filozoficzny
Ruch Filozoficzny Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cień na oświeceniowym rozumie, czyli Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Immanuel Kant i Hugo Kołłątaj o kobietach, ich roli społecznej i edukacji Sprawiedliwość i równość w interpretacji liderów polskiej myśli oświeceniowej Zetetyczny rejs Kwestia wolności w ujęciu Spinozy i Leibniza a perspektywa kompatybilistyczna Anthony Collins i jego pierwsza rozprawa (An Essay Concerning the Use of Reason in Propositions, The Evidence whereof depends upon Human Testimony)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1