Genotoxic assessment of oxadiazon and pendimethalin herbicides on Eisenia hortensis by comet and micronucleus tests

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.21162/pakjas/22.9940
İ. Ciğerci
{"title":"Genotoxic assessment of oxadiazon and pendimethalin herbicides on Eisenia hortensis by comet and micronucleus tests","authors":"İ. Ciğerci","doi":"10.21162/pakjas/22.9940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Herbicides are chemicals that are widely and unconsciously used to control unwanted weeds. Herbicides do not only damage the target animals, but they also damage the off-target soil fauna. In our study, it was aimed to determine the mutational genotoxic consequences of commonly used Oxadiazon (OD) and Pendimethalin (PM) herbicides in agriculture fields on Eisenia hortensis (E. hortensis) species by using Comet and Micronucleus tests. Consequently, the LD50values for OD and PM herbicides were estimated at0.25 ppm and 0.24 ppm, respectively. Concentration series of OD and PM herbicides, ½ LD50, LD50, and 2 × LD50 were applied to E. hortensis for 48 h. As a negative control group, distilled water was used for both herbicides. An increase inthe concentration of damaged DNA and chromosomal aberration of E. hortensis coelomocytes was observed by both herbicides. Highest DNA damage (32.33 ± 2.51; 15.33 ± 1.15) was observed by the highest concentrations of OD (0.51 ppm) and PM (0.48 ppm), respectively. The negative control group had shown the least genotoxic effects. There was statistically significant (p <0.05) difference among different concentration values of OD and PM herbicides.","PeriodicalId":19885,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21162/pakjas/22.9940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Herbicides are chemicals that are widely and unconsciously used to control unwanted weeds. Herbicides do not only damage the target animals, but they also damage the off-target soil fauna. In our study, it was aimed to determine the mutational genotoxic consequences of commonly used Oxadiazon (OD) and Pendimethalin (PM) herbicides in agriculture fields on Eisenia hortensis (E. hortensis) species by using Comet and Micronucleus tests. Consequently, the LD50values for OD and PM herbicides were estimated at0.25 ppm and 0.24 ppm, respectively. Concentration series of OD and PM herbicides, ½ LD50, LD50, and 2 × LD50 were applied to E. hortensis for 48 h. As a negative control group, distilled water was used for both herbicides. An increase inthe concentration of damaged DNA and chromosomal aberration of E. hortensis coelomocytes was observed by both herbicides. Highest DNA damage (32.33 ± 2.51; 15.33 ± 1.15) was observed by the highest concentrations of OD (0.51 ppm) and PM (0.48 ppm), respectively. The negative control group had shown the least genotoxic effects. There was statistically significant (p <0.05) difference among different concentration values of OD and PM herbicides.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用彗星试验和微核试验评价恶二唑和对二甲甲烷除草剂对爱森尼亚的遗传毒性
除草剂是一种被广泛无意识地用于控制杂草的化学物质。除草剂不仅会破坏目标动物,还会破坏偏离目标的土壤动物。在我们的研究中,目的是通过彗星和微核试验来确定农田中常用的恶二唑宗(OD)和二甲哈林(PM)除草剂对爱胜酵母(E.hortensis)物种的突变遗传毒性后果。因此,OD和PM除草剂的LD50值估计分别为0.25 ppm和0.24 ppm。将OD和PM除草剂的浓度系列,½LD50、LD50和2×LD50施用于E.hortensis 48小时。作为阴性对照组,蒸馏水用于两种除草剂。两种除草剂均能提高E.hortensis体腔细胞受损DNA的浓度和染色体畸变。最高浓度的OD(0.51ppm)和PM(0.48ppm)分别观察到最高的DNA损伤(32.33±2.51;15.33±1.15)。阴性对照组的基因毒性最小。OD和PM除草剂不同浓度值间差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences
Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences is published in English four times a year. The journal publishes original articles on all aspects of agriculture and allied fields.
期刊最新文献
Benefit evaluation of human resource management in agricultural enterprises based on convolutional neural network Effects of Hexythiazox on Different Stages of Mites Infesting Orange Trees Toxic effects of essential oils against Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius, 1889) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and its certain important natural enemies Biological control of root rots on alfalfa with Streptomyces Digital financial inclusion, Chinese farmers’ entrepreneurship well-being and selfconfidence: evidence from rural China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1