Use of reduced Bokashi doses is similar to NPK fertilization in iceberg lettuce production

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Agronomia Colombiana Pub Date : 2022-08-31 DOI:10.15446/agron.colomb.v40n2.102900
Danilo Pezzoto de Lima, Gustavo Adolfo de Freitas Fregonezi, F. Hata, M. U. Ventura, J. Resende, C. D. S. Wanderley, A. Figueiredo
{"title":"Use of reduced Bokashi doses is similar to NPK fertilization in iceberg lettuce production","authors":"Danilo Pezzoto de Lima, Gustavo Adolfo de Freitas Fregonezi, F. Hata, M. U. Ventura, J. Resende, C. D. S. Wanderley, A. Figueiredo","doi":"10.15446/agron.colomb.v40n2.102900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to compare horticultural variables of iceberg lettuce using two Bokashi compost doses, alone and in combination, with the bioactivator Penergetic (Penergetic International AG®) against standard mineral fertilization (NPK) in three crop cycles. Experiments were conducted in a plastic greenhouse at the Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Brazil (548 m a.s.l.). The treatments were: negative control (water, only); positive control (NPK, 4-14-8); Penergetic alone; Bokashi doses 5 g and 10 g/plant with or without a combination with Penergetic. Lettuce plants were grown in pots filled with soil. Commercial biomass (CM), head diameter (HD), plant height (PH) and chlorophyll index (CI) were evaluated. In the three cycles tested, the Bokashi 10 g/plant, Bokashi 10 g/plant + Penergetic, and NPK treatments surpassed the control. The studied variables (CM, HD, PH and CI) in the lower Bokashi dose treatment were also higher than controls but lower than higher Bokashi doses and NPK. Penergetic increases the CM in the lower Bokashi dose treatment just in the first production cycle, probably due to the poor organic matter content in the soil. The treatment Bokashi 10 g/plant improved significantly the lettuce horticultural variables vs. control treatments and was similar to chemical fertilization in two or three crop cycles.","PeriodicalId":38464,"journal":{"name":"Agronomia Colombiana","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomia Colombiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v40n2.102900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare horticultural variables of iceberg lettuce using two Bokashi compost doses, alone and in combination, with the bioactivator Penergetic (Penergetic International AG®) against standard mineral fertilization (NPK) in three crop cycles. Experiments were conducted in a plastic greenhouse at the Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Brazil (548 m a.s.l.). The treatments were: negative control (water, only); positive control (NPK, 4-14-8); Penergetic alone; Bokashi doses 5 g and 10 g/plant with or without a combination with Penergetic. Lettuce plants were grown in pots filled with soil. Commercial biomass (CM), head diameter (HD), plant height (PH) and chlorophyll index (CI) were evaluated. In the three cycles tested, the Bokashi 10 g/plant, Bokashi 10 g/plant + Penergetic, and NPK treatments surpassed the control. The studied variables (CM, HD, PH and CI) in the lower Bokashi dose treatment were also higher than controls but lower than higher Bokashi doses and NPK. Penergetic increases the CM in the lower Bokashi dose treatment just in the first production cycle, probably due to the poor organic matter content in the soil. The treatment Bokashi 10 g/plant improved significantly the lettuce horticultural variables vs. control treatments and was similar to chemical fertilization in two or three crop cycles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在卷心莴苣生产中使用减少的Bokashi剂量与氮磷钾施肥相似
该研究的目的是比较在三个作物周期中使用两种Bokashi堆肥剂量的卷心莴苣的园艺变量,单独使用和组合使用生物激活剂Penergetic (Penergetic International AG®)与标准矿物施肥(NPK)。实验在巴西Londrina universsidade Estadual de london的塑料温室(548 m a.l.)进行。处理为:阴性对照(仅水);阳性对照(NPK, 4-14-8);Penergetic孤独;Bokashi剂量5克和10克/株,与Penergetic或不与Penergetic联合使用。生菜种植在装满泥土的花盆里。对商业生物量(CM)、头径(HD)、株高(PH)和叶绿素指数(CI)进行了评价。在3个循环试验中,博卡什10 g/株、博卡什10 g/株+ perergetic和NPK处理均超过对照。低Bokashi剂量处理的CM、HD、PH和CI也高于对照,但低于高Bokashi剂量和NPK。低博卡施剂量处理仅在第一个生产周期就使CM增加,可能是由于土壤有机质含量较差。与对照处理相比,博卡施10 g/株处理显著提高了生菜的园艺指标,并且在2个或3个作物周期内与化学施肥相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomia Colombiana
Agronomia Colombiana Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Agronomia Colombiana journal it is intended to transfer research results in different areas of tropical agronomy. Original unpublished papers are therefore accepted in the following areas: physiology, crop nutrition and fertilization, genetics and plant breeding, entomology, phytopathology, integrated crop protection, agro ecology, weed science, environmental management, geomatics, biometry, soils, water and irrigation, agroclimatology and climate change, post-harvest and agricultural industrialization, food technology, rural and agricultural entrepreneurial development, agrarian economy, and agricultural marketing (Published: Quarterly).
期刊最新文献
Effect of genotype-environment interaction on soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) germination, vigor index, and seed yield Calibration of alternative equations to estimate the reference evapotranspiration in Nova Venécia, Espírito Santo, Brazil First record of Melophagus ovinus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Diptera: Hippoboscidae) for Nuevo Leon, Mexico Impact of waterlogging on fruit crops in the era of climate change, with emphasis on tropical and subtropical species: A review Defoliation tolerance of soybean cultivars commercially released in different decades
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1