迟婧, Chi Jing, 徐东风, XU Dongfeng, 尹胜男, Yin Shengnan, 丁宁, Ding Ning, 赵雪文, Zhao Xuewen, 计一丁, JI Yiding
{"title":"Application of 70 kVp tube voltage combined with the FLASH in low-dose CT of pediatric paranasal sinus","authors":"迟婧, Chi Jing, 徐东风, XU Dongfeng, 尹胜男, Yin Shengnan, 丁宁, Ding Ning, 赵雪文, Zhao Xuewen, 计一丁, JI Yiding","doi":"10.13491/J.ISSN.1004-714X.2021.04.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To evaluate the feasibility of dual-source low-dose computed tomography (CT) of the\n paranasal sinus in children, with acquisition at an ultra-low tube voltage (70 kVp)\n combined with the Flash scan.\n Methods CT scans of the paranasal sinus were performed on 80 pediatric patients who were\n divided into two groups according to different protocols (70 kVp protocol with Flash\n scan mode and the iterative reconstruction, pitch 3, the experimental group (group\n A), n = 40; 80 kVp protocol with conventional spiral mode, pitch 1.5, control group (group\n B), n = 40). For each examination, the CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP)\n and effective dose (ED) were estimated. The image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)\n and overall subjective diagnostic image quality were also evaluated.\n Results The images of these two groups were all satisfied for the clinical diagnosis. For\n radiation dose, the CTDIvol (mGy), DLP (mGycm) and ED (mSv) values of the 70 kVp protocol\n were significantly lower than those of the 80 kVp protocol [CTDIvol: 0.39 ± 0.004\n vs 1.57 ± 0.009 mGy, P < 0.001; DLP: 6.31 ± 0.52 vs 19.88 ± 2.01 mGycm, P < 0.001; ED: 0.024 ± 0.005 vs 0.079 ± 0.016 mSv, P < 0.001. Compared with those of the 80-kVp protocol, the image noise and the SNR\n bone increased, the SNR\n soft-tissue decreased. There was no statistical difference in the subjective scores of the two\n groups of image quality by the two physicians (\n P > 0.05).\n Conclusion When diagnosing the paranasal sinus in children, an ultralow tube voltage (70 kVp)\n combined with the Flash scan technique can reduce the radiation dose significantly\n while maintaining diagnostic image quality with clinically acceptable image noise.\n 摘要: 目的 探讨双源CT超低管电压(70 kVp)联合FLASH的扫描技术在儿童鼻旁窦检查中的可行性。\n 方法 选 取80例临床怀疑鼻旁窦炎的患儿随机分成A、B两组, 实验组 (A组) 40 例: 管电压70 kVp, 螺距3.0,所得数据采用迭 代算法(SAFIRE)重建;对照组(B\n 组) 40例: 管电压80 kVp, 螺距1.5,所得数据采用滤波反投影算法(FBP)重建。分析 比较2组不同扫描方式的主、客观图像质量以及辐射剂量, 包括容积CT剂量指数(CTDIvol)、剂量长度乘积(DLP),\n 并计算有效辐射剂量(ED)。\n 结果 患者所受的辐射剂量, 实验组的CTDIvol (mGy)、DLP (mGycm)和ED (mSv)较 对照组显著降低 (CTDIvol: 0.39 ± 0.004\n vs 1.57 ± 0.009 mGy, P < 0.001; DLP: 6.31 ± 0.52 vs 19.88 ± 2.01 mGycm, P < 0.001; ED: 0.024 ± 0.005 vs 0.079 ± 0.016 mSv, P < 0.001)。较对照组, 试验组的图像噪声及SNR硬组织均有所增加, SNR软组织则有所下降。2名医师对2组图像质量的主观评分无统计学差异 (\n P > 0.05)。\n 结论 超低管电压 (70 kVp) 联 合FLASH扫描技术可明显降低儿童鼻旁窦CT扫描剂量, 且图像质量均满足诊断要求。","PeriodicalId":58844,"journal":{"name":"中国辐射卫生","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国辐射卫生","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13491/J.ISSN.1004-714X.2021.04.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the feasibility of dual-source low-dose computed tomography (CT) of the
paranasal sinus in children, with acquisition at an ultra-low tube voltage (70 kVp)
combined with the Flash scan.
Methods CT scans of the paranasal sinus were performed on 80 pediatric patients who were
divided into two groups according to different protocols (70 kVp protocol with Flash
scan mode and the iterative reconstruction, pitch 3, the experimental group (group
A), n = 40; 80 kVp protocol with conventional spiral mode, pitch 1.5, control group (group
B), n = 40). For each examination, the CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP)
and effective dose (ED) were estimated. The image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)
and overall subjective diagnostic image quality were also evaluated.
Results The images of these two groups were all satisfied for the clinical diagnosis. For
radiation dose, the CTDIvol (mGy), DLP (mGycm) and ED (mSv) values of the 70 kVp protocol
were significantly lower than those of the 80 kVp protocol [CTDIvol: 0.39 ± 0.004
vs 1.57 ± 0.009 mGy, P < 0.001; DLP: 6.31 ± 0.52 vs 19.88 ± 2.01 mGycm, P < 0.001; ED: 0.024 ± 0.005 vs 0.079 ± 0.016 mSv, P < 0.001. Compared with those of the 80-kVp protocol, the image noise and the SNR
bone increased, the SNR
soft-tissue decreased. There was no statistical difference in the subjective scores of the two
groups of image quality by the two physicians (
P > 0.05).
Conclusion When diagnosing the paranasal sinus in children, an ultralow tube voltage (70 kVp)
combined with the Flash scan technique can reduce the radiation dose significantly
while maintaining diagnostic image quality with clinically acceptable image noise.
摘要: 目的 探讨双源CT超低管电压(70 kVp)联合FLASH的扫描技术在儿童鼻旁窦检查中的可行性。
方法 选 取80例临床怀疑鼻旁窦炎的患儿随机分成A、B两组, 实验组 (A组) 40 例: 管电压70 kVp, 螺距3.0,所得数据采用迭 代算法(SAFIRE)重建;对照组(B
组) 40例: 管电压80 kVp, 螺距1.5,所得数据采用滤波反投影算法(FBP)重建。分析 比较2组不同扫描方式的主、客观图像质量以及辐射剂量, 包括容积CT剂量指数(CTDIvol)、剂量长度乘积(DLP),
并计算有效辐射剂量(ED)。
结果 患者所受的辐射剂量, 实验组的CTDIvol (mGy)、DLP (mGycm)和ED (mSv)较 对照组显著降低 (CTDIvol: 0.39 ± 0.004
vs 1.57 ± 0.009 mGy, P < 0.001; DLP: 6.31 ± 0.52 vs 19.88 ± 2.01 mGycm, P < 0.001; ED: 0.024 ± 0.005 vs 0.079 ± 0.016 mSv, P < 0.001)。较对照组, 试验组的图像噪声及SNR硬组织均有所增加, SNR软组织则有所下降。2名医师对2组图像质量的主观评分无统计学差异 (
P > 0.05)。
结论 超低管电压 (70 kVp) 联 合FLASH扫描技术可明显降低儿童鼻旁窦CT扫描剂量, 且图像质量均满足诊断要求。
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Radiological Health is one of the Source Journals for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations and belongs to the series published by Chinese Preventive Medicine Association (CPMA). It is a national academic journal supervised by National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China and co-sponsored by Institute of Radiation Medicine, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences and CPMA, and is a professional academic journal publishing research findings and management experience in the field of radiological health, issued to the public in China and abroad. Under the guidance of the Communist Party of China and the national press and publication policies, the Journal actively publicizes the guidelines and policies of the Party and the state on health work, promotes the implementation of relevant laws, regulations and standards, and timely reports new achievements, new information, new methods and new products in the specialty, with the aim of organizing and promoting the academic communication of radiological health in China and improving the academic level of the specialty, and for the purpose of protecting the health of radiation workers and the public while promoting the extensive use of radioisotopes and radiation devices in the national economy. The main columns include Original Articles, Expert Comments, Experience Exchange, Standards and Guidelines, and Review Articles.